and i have not heard a single complaint yet. this guy was just plain embarrassing. the article is worth a read, and while satirical, it links to several articles about the actual incidences.
essentially, while still a city councillor, Rob Ford used city letterhead and "other resources" to request donations for the high school football team he was coaching. city council decided he owed a fine. he refused to pay it.
once he became mayor, the matter came up for a vote. he went and defended his case in person. then he voted on the matter, as mayor, obviously in favour of himself.
the courts decided he was in violation of Canada's Conflict of Interest Act, and should have taken himself out of the vote.
in 14 days, he's outta here, and it's believed the office will be taken over by the deputy mayor. our city seems to be quite pleased to oust a mayor that refused to attend the Pride parade, was caught (and admitted to) reading while driving, wants to eliminate bike lanes, called 911 on a satirical tv show host trying to ask him questions, ordered deportation of minorities after a tragic shooting, gave the finger to a woman for saying he shouldn't be on his cellphone while driving, and said all sorts of stupid, offensive things on record.
yep. he can't run if there's a by-election (as far as i know) because even though he's been kicked out, his term technically isn't up until 2014. but he'll be allowed to run again then.
though hopefully people will have smartened up by then. i can't imagine him ever getting voted back in.
lexxie said:
though hopefully people will have smartened up by then. i can't imagine him ever getting voted back in.
Being originally from Toronto and still having family/friends there, I hope this is true. Though I can't say I have a lot of optimism when it comes to people managing to NOT elect idiots/assholes/criminals into public office.
Unfortunately Ford is also appealing the ruling so he is not gone yet. He goes to court on Dec. 5 to ask to have the lower courts ruling stayed until his appeal is heard some time in January. If the stay is granted we could be stuck with him until the appeals court rules on the case which could be sometime next spring.
There's a protest being planned for Dec.6 to complain about him being booted. To be perfectly honest, I have no idea if this is serious or satire, but either way it's hiliarous.
Toronto Mayor Rob Ford was cleared today to run again for mayor in a byelection, should one be held ahead of the 2014 municipal election.
Lawyers for Ford, who earlier this week was ordered out of office by Superior Court Justice Charles T. Hackland in a conflict of interest case, asked the judge to clarify his ruling to clear up confusion about whether the order bars him as a byelection candidate.
At issue was a sentence in paragraph 60 of the judge's original ruling that said: "I decline to impose any further disqualification from holding office beyond the current term."
Ford's lawyer wanted clarification on what was meant by "beyond the current term." The question that had observers confused was: Did the term end when the mayor gave up his seat to comply with the sanction, or did the judge mean the term of office as defined in the Municipal Act, which would mean a term ending in 2014?
On Friday, the judge responded by amending his previous ruling. He deleted the words "beyond the current term" from his original ruling.
That means Ford can seek the mayor's chair if the city opts to hold a byelection ahead of the 2014 municipal election. Council also has the option of appointing a mayor to serve until 2014.
Ford is also applying for a stay of judgment, which will be heard Wednesday. If successful, he would remain mayor until his appeal runs its course.
The ruling to vacate the seat, if a stay application is unsuccessful, would take effect Dec. 10. Ford's appeal of the ruling could be heard as early as Jan. 7.
Shame that Toronto has lost it's number one floor show but at least Ralph Klein has a crazy political friend to hang out with now.
And yeah, some Albertans are good. Others... not so much. While I lived there I remember being greeted once with, "Here comes BC boy. Probably gonna tell us how the fags should get married again."
Try and have one conversation about equal rights...
He still acted disgracefully at every single opportunity and then got really lucky. It turns out the integrity commissioner can dole out consequences for raising money in violation of the code of ethics. But as Ford didn't receive the $ and it went straight to the legitimate charity of the football teams (no one is saying the money was mishandled or that the charity isn't legitimate), the specific penalty of paying the money back couldn't be applied. (I think other penalties like a suspension were available, but that is not what the commissioner penalized him with).
So the original penalty couldn't stand, so he didn't owe any money. And since there was no longer any money involved, there could not be a conflict of interest when he refused to step aside on the later vote to eliminate the requirement he pay the money back. Lucky.
I would like to say something like "he's so dumb he doesn't even know when he's not breaking the law", but it looks like most everyone else, including the first trial judge was also wrong. Instead I think of it like getting caught for stealing silverware, but getting off because it turns out it just happened to be plastic cutlery.
lexxie
Toronto, ON
October 2008
NOV 26, 2012 01:29 PM