anti-Obama ad in form of question.

the manchurian candidate and his weasly fuctards, try to lure you in with this one. Me thinks it's going to backfire. This reeks of that turd rove.
http://www.johnmccain.com/landing/b3.htm?&sid=google&t=Iran&r=israel

One of these days, Rove's head is going to split open so the horns can poke through.

I assumed he just filed them down, like Hellboy.

seems pretty mild to me.

Pretty tame stuff.

It's the implication. And as stated it seems like a sure backfire.
It's about DIPLOMACY.
And no matter what you answer they think you want to join them.WTF

Never said it was anything but rovean in nature. The hostility is just my natural disdain for these ass-hat wearing imbeciles.
This is just like the SC calls of 2000 repub primary. The one's were the caller asked" what if John McCain had a black child out of wedlock". Now that is paraphrasing the call, but that was the jest of it. roves idea, inside source.

I would say that this is quite different. Obama said that he would be willing to meet with Ahmadinejad (as well as Chavez, Kim Jong-il, etc) without preconditions. While that Rove push poll from 2000 had no basis in fact whatsoever.

Form of a question?
And no wonder twin powers comments!

Did anyone see the CNN spot about Clinton supporters creating anti-Obama websites in droves? I wish I had the link, but apparently there's a mother-ship website that links to the hundreds of other anti-Obama sites all created by die-hard Clinton loyalists. Yeah, vote for McCain you morons.

I'll check it out, sounds plausible for the diehard motards.

Hey now, don't go comparing Anung un Rama to Rove. Rove would embrace Ragnarok and probably can't throw a right hook to save his life.

?

Is this statement based on impression or research? I'm not contesting it. I'm just curious. I've never even really thought about it that much. This is the first primary in recent memory where it's really been a big deal. Anyway, I appreciate your insight. The whole defection rate thing has really worried me, and if it is in fact lower than typical that's very welcomed.

I am confused why this "ad" is bad since it deals with really policy about how our foreign policy/diplomacy will be in the future (i.e. do we have unconditioned meetings or do we keep the tradition of having pre-conceived conditions before we meet with foreign leaders). I am also wondering why this needed its own thread and why do you think John McCain is a brainwashed to be a assassin for the Communist Party by being controlled by his mother...

your confusion should not exist, never said ad was bad. Only that it's rovean in nature and that it could backfire. If having read further you would of picked up on the, it's about DIPLOMACY comment. And I'll make it clear that I'm all for it,(diplomacy) it was implied, but obviously not understood.
the manchurian candidate cuz I no longer have a shred of respect for him. He is a bought and paid for ,no different from bush. Led by handlers. and is willing to sacrifice our troops my fellow Marines for what?

Alex ,I'll take anal bum cover for a hundred.
Both items I mentioned are in the form of a question, thus the similarities.
One is a substantive issue(diplomacy), the other just plain disgusting and unfounded, sadly it worked.
Mucho props to your Jeopardy pic.

This short video is on the front page of his web site.

John McCain: Courageous Service

His mother tells us we'll be the luckiest people in the world if we pick John for president. His wife agrees.

Ha ha !

Straight talk express.