Cats 'n Kittens,
Zoli's latest set blew me away...
It just oozes raw sexuality (hence it's title, "Raw"), and there's so many great angles and shots, and she's so damn cute, sexy and feminine... damn.
I wanted to post picture 20, with that beautiful smile, but it's too wide.
I love the word "oozes."
In regards to my last post...
I got great comments on it! Thanks! However, it had one fatal flaw, and I'm really surprised no one gave me shit for it. I left no room for homosexuality, and that's just not fair. I left it out because I just forgot, not any specific reason. I don't even know how to include them, because they aren't the norm (I didn't say not normal, just not the norm. It's different), and just don't know how.
Anyone got a good answer? I would friggin' love to hear it!
Interesting fact...
There have been studies done about homosexuality in nature (outside of us, of course), and there is strong evidence that most species show examples of homosexual activity and partnership. In fact, there is strong evidence to suggest that homosexual animals are significantly more faithful to their partners than heterosexual animals, and mate (yeah, mating refers to breeding, but it's the most suitable word) for life. Giraffres are the most commonly used example. Look into it. It's pretty cool.
So there, people who gay people are all slutty. Like my entire family. Not that my entire family is slutty; they think gay people are all slutty. Get it? Yeah, you get it. You're all smart folks. That's why I love you all.
I think that rejecting Arden's set...
... was a HUGE mistake. I love this set. I probably go back to it more often than any other set on the site, mostly because I don't get why they rejected it. The lighting is great, the photography is great, and she looks amazing. Go check it out on her page if you have not done so. Man, I love that smile.
I don't like "tags." I think they kind of cheapen the sets. Most of them refer to "small tits" or "big tits" or something like that. They feel shallow to me; or at least shallower than I would like. Maybe I look too deeply into the sets, and see something that's not there.
A'yuh,
J.R.
Zoli's latest set blew me away...
It just oozes raw sexuality (hence it's title, "Raw"), and there's so many great angles and shots, and she's so damn cute, sexy and feminine... damn.
I wanted to post picture 20, with that beautiful smile, but it's too wide.
I love the word "oozes."
In regards to my last post...
I got great comments on it! Thanks! However, it had one fatal flaw, and I'm really surprised no one gave me shit for it. I left no room for homosexuality, and that's just not fair. I left it out because I just forgot, not any specific reason. I don't even know how to include them, because they aren't the norm (I didn't say not normal, just not the norm. It's different), and just don't know how.
Anyone got a good answer? I would friggin' love to hear it!
Interesting fact...
There have been studies done about homosexuality in nature (outside of us, of course), and there is strong evidence that most species show examples of homosexual activity and partnership. In fact, there is strong evidence to suggest that homosexual animals are significantly more faithful to their partners than heterosexual animals, and mate (yeah, mating refers to breeding, but it's the most suitable word) for life. Giraffres are the most commonly used example. Look into it. It's pretty cool.
So there, people who gay people are all slutty. Like my entire family. Not that my entire family is slutty; they think gay people are all slutty. Get it? Yeah, you get it. You're all smart folks. That's why I love you all.
I think that rejecting Arden's set...
... was a HUGE mistake. I love this set. I probably go back to it more often than any other set on the site, mostly because I don't get why they rejected it. The lighting is great, the photography is great, and she looks amazing. Go check it out on her page if you have not done so. Man, I love that smile.
I don't like "tags." I think they kind of cheapen the sets. Most of them refer to "small tits" or "big tits" or something like that. They feel shallow to me; or at least shallower than I would like. Maybe I look too deeply into the sets, and see something that's not there.
A'yuh,
J.R.