I don't usually bitch about site shenanigans, but what's the deal with posting old interviews to the front page, as though they're new?
I get that it's tough times. One set per day. No more articles. I'm disappointed about those things, but I still feel I'm getting my 50-bucks-a-year of nude ladies and social groups.
However, there's no need to clutter up the front page with recycled feed. I'd rather see a bunch of recent "featured blogs" than an interview from three years ago. Pretending there's more new content than there actually is won't make me any more inclined to renew my membership.
Just FYI.
I get that it's tough times. One set per day. No more articles. I'm disappointed about those things, but I still feel I'm getting my 50-bucks-a-year of nude ladies and social groups.
However, there's no need to clutter up the front page with recycled feed. I'd rather see a bunch of recent "featured blogs" than an interview from three years ago. Pretending there's more new content than there actually is won't make me any more inclined to renew my membership.
Just FYI.