BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

I’ve been a film fan my entire life. For me, the television was always a way for me to view my favorite films on home video. But lately I find myself hooked on a number of amazing television series that not only exceed my expectations, but provide a more satisfying experience than actually going to the movies. Over the last year or so, I’ve seen shows like Heroes and Entourage and Flight of the Conchords and Battlestar Galactica on HD in my makeshift home theater and the odds that I’ll have a good time are much better than taking a risk on the latest multiplex offerings. Sometimes the joy in seeing a bad movie is in picking apart that movie, but films of late have seemed so out of touch, so less-than-spectacular, so meh, that I’d rather just check my Tivo or rent a season of television on DVD, and settle into my couch to continue to make that reverse impression of my behind.

This is not just the Golden Age, we might as well rename this period marked by a plethora of quality television as the "Platinum Age of TV."

This shift in my media consumption has led me to the conclusion that currently the best television programs are much better than the best movies. There, I said it. And it’s a tough thing for me to admit being a lifelong movie guy. I know this will spark much debate, but I’d like to present my case with the following evidence.

The theatrical experience is miserable while home theaters are affordable.
Fact: Rude jackasses talking during movies was only the beginning, now more people are treating the movie theater like their living rooms. Cell phone use has virtually destroyed the enjoyment of experiencing a movie on the big screen. There are only a few movie theaters in Los Angeles that have no tolerance policies toward those bright lights that pop up as people mindlessly take calls or text during films. When one considers the cost of an evening at the movies (ticket prices, refreshments, parking, babysitter if needed), it makes the cost of a home theater system seem within reach. If the average movie night costs about $80, you need to stay home only nine times to save enough to buy a 37” widescreen HD TV for about $700.

The cell phone has practically killed the movie theater experience... while home theaters are more affordable than ever.

TV on DVD currently outsell hit movies on DVD.
Fact: Visiting the shelves of video stores, as a category, the television section has grown beyond one aisle. And you’ll find even the most obscure old series available in boxed sets with tons of extras. And you may even find yourself interested in checking out what’s on the special features for The Beverly Hillbillies Ultimate Collection Volume 1 & 2 which includes unedited episodes, commercial promos, rare behind-the-scenes, and the pilot that never aired. Or not, but that’s just an example of the lengths to which television is being repurposed on DVD. Video business trade publications support this, but one need only check Amazon.com to observe that of the top 10 selling DVDs, eight are television shows and the top four consist of Grey's Anatomy - The Complete Third Season, The Office - Season Three, Heroes - Season One, and Smallville - The Complete Sixth Season.

Which group of heroes would you prefer to watch? The movies' Fantastic Four or televisions' Heroes?

Movies have become formulaic while TV is original.
Fact: The summer movie season is known for its batch of both good and bad films, but all of them consist of either sequels, remakes, TV shows made into movies, comic books or generally films based on previously known properties and/or franchises. So, if it’s not going to be familiar with a wide audience, studios are reluctant to back films that are original. Conversely, television is now the place where originality thrives.

Televisions' Battlestar Galactica proves that science fiction can be intelligent. When was the last time a sci-fi movie was able to explore serious issues?

The movie audience is shrinking.
Fact: Television continues to thrive as consumers either watch TV, Tivo TV, download TV or buy TV on DVD. And while the Nielson ratings support that the pie continues to break down into smaller pieces, when one includes other ways in which viewers get their TV fix, the audience is growing. The reverse is true when it comes to movie-going. George Lucas visited the campus of USC last year for a ribbon-cutting ceremony in which he pointed out that the movie audience is indeed shrinking. While the studios make bold statements regarding bigger and bigger box-office numbers, when one adjusts for inflation, fewer people are going to the movies each year.

Televisions' Jack Bauer from 24 and Jason Bourne from the Bourne film series both deliver compelling action.

Movies are made by committee. While television remains a writers’ medium which leads to better storytelling.
Fact: Film scripts written by screenwriters who toiled for years are bought by studios who quickly fire the original writer and hire a new one to rewrite the script, and this process of rewrites continues with notes coming from all departments of the studio including marketing. And worse, a screenwriter who gets a film made every three years should be considered lucky, some wait as long as seven years or more to see their work on the big screen. Useful feedback from audiences in the form of box-office or reviews, which can contribute toward developing a talented screenwriter, comes too late in the process to be of any value. While television writers are also subjected to studio notes, the original writers are part of a writing staff that oversees the integrity of the script. The goal is that there be consistent storytelling, which is especially important for any episodic series. The writing process for television leads to a healthier development environment resulting in better programming all around. Simply, writers get respect on TV and that means the shows are better.

TV Producers are the new Hollywood movie success stories.
Fact: Because TV writer/producers exercise their writing muscles on a regular basis by producing hundreds of hours of content, they develop into much better writers. By getting constant feedback from regular viewing audiences in the form of ratings and inevitable forum rants, their quality creative output increases. The stories of successful television-to-film crossovers include writer/producers such as J.J. Abrams (Mission Impossible III) to Judd Apatow (40 Year-Old Virgin, Superbad, Knocked Up) to Joss Whedon (Serenity). In fact, they’ve become the most sought after by the studios to deliver the latest summer movie epics such as J.J. Abrams upcoming reinvention of Star Trek.

While most would agree that the movie-going experience has deteriorated, would you pay $10 to watch two hours of Lost?

There remains one big question: Would you pay money to see TV at the movie theater? As an experiment, I’d love to see a special episode of Heroes or Lost open in theaters while still showing on TV. Imagine this scenario: The season finale of Lost will screen unedited in a limited number of movie theaters across the country for one week before that episode actually airs on television. It would be a great way to connect with fellow fans in the audience. For me, knowing the fate of the Lost cast, if only for a week, would be worth the price of admission.

Would you pay to see TV at the movies? If you paid to see The Simpsons Movie, then the answer must be "yes."

Gore gone.

Chris_Gore will return after these messages. And you can watch more of this debate, ironically, on television.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

RileyStClair

RileyStClair

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

SEP 14, 2007 12:12 PM

i would not pay to see tv at the movies, sorry. ii don't watch tv to watch all this gorgeous cinematic action happen on a big screen. i watch the shows i watch because i like the writing and the characters and it doesn't really matter how big the screen is or how good the sound is. half the time i watch tv on my tiny laptop screen anyway.

it would mostly just annoy me that other people knew how the season of say, grey's anatomy or the office ended before i did and i'd have to go into media blackout (read: no blogs whatsoever!) until it aired.

but then, i don't own a fancy tv and i don't even have cable, so i'm probably not the target audience for tv much either. although i do rent or buy my favorite shows on dvd, which i find is way more efficient than paying time warner for 60 channels i do not ever watch and 5 that i do.

i do totally agree that tv these days is way better than movies overall.

travisaurusrex

travisaurusrex

Portland, OR
August 2007

SEP 14, 2007 12:29 PM

you got some pretty valid points in there. While I might not agree with every little thing you've said, I would overwhelmingly agree with your general sentiment. The platinum age it is.

apesamongus

apesamongus

Atlanta, GA
July 2002

SEP 14, 2007 12:34 PM

I'm gonna have to side with the movies on this one.

TheWhale

TheWhale

Troy, MI
August 2004

SEP 14, 2007 01:08 PM

Bzzt! Try again.

Chris_Gore

Chris_Gore

Los Angeles, CA
September 2005

SEP 14, 2007 01:31 PM

apesamongus said:
I'm gonna have to side with the movies on this one.



Of course, I respect your opinion. However, I feel that there are a number of great television series that are consistently good -- in fact, so many I don't have the time to watch them all.

Can you supply specific reasons as to why you feel differently?

NikkiIs

NikkiIs

Drexel, MO
April 2005

SEP 14, 2007 01:34 PM

Quote
"There remains one big question: Would you pay money to see TV at the movie theater? As an experiment, I'd love to see a special episode of Heroes or Lost open in theaters while still showing on TV. "


Didn't they try that with the X Files?

Chris_Gore

Chris_Gore

Los Angeles, CA
September 2005

SEP 14, 2007 01:43 PM

NikkiIs said:
Quote
"There remains one big question: Would you pay money to see TV at the movie theater?
Didn't they try that with the X Files?



Yes, and the result was not great, however, they are considering another X-Files movie, but that series had run its course long before it ended.

I think it would be interesting to provide theatrical television crossovers during the height of a shows' success -- not when the show is on the wane as a way to milk the audience one last time for cash.

TedKoppel

TedKoppel

Glendale, AZ
March 2004

SEP 14, 2007 02:00 PM

The Wire for me is up there with just about anything in movies, but it also points out a flaw with a lot of current television. The format of The Wire is a beginning, middle and end for each season, which makes the whole thing play, as the shows creators describe, a novel with each episode being a chapter that furthers the story. With the possible exception of Battlestar Galactica, I don't think anyone else is doing anything resembling that (I exempt Battlestar because an ending to that show is promised).

For just about everything else, I feel like I'm being strung along. Lost, of course, fell to the point where it seemed like the writers were just making more weird shit up without actually knowing where the hell it was going. Whether or not that's true, they certainly kept throwing mystery upon mystery into the mix without doing anything. House is fun, but it's the same show every time, the only new and interesting thing being the levels of misanthropy. The Office is great, but the Jim/Pam thing is the same goddamned Ross/Rachel thing that always happens in TV, and it's a frustrating element, because the whole problem with that type of storyline is that the writers are counting on you wanting the people to be together, which means they string you along. Heroes seemed closest to be building towards something which paid off in the end, but then it really fizzled, plus it blatantly ripped off Watchmen, which was annoying (I'm going to distinguish between "referencing Watchmen" and "taking the climax of Watchmen and putting it in your show).

While I don't disagree that this is a great age for television, I would argue that there's still a lot of room for improvement. Not every show has to be The Wire - dense, unapproachable, cynical as hell - but I would love to see more shows taking the format The Wire has chosen.

TedKoppel

TedKoppel

Glendale, AZ
March 2004

SEP 14, 2007 02:03 PM

Plus, how can you question the quality of movies on the very day that Dragon Wars begins showing?

joker_

joker_

Windsor, CA
October 2005

SEP 14, 2007 02:51 PM

I liked the article. Recently, with some of the movies that have come out I've thought they would have been better as a television show, comic book movies in particular.
When a television show does capture my attention (new Dr Who, Torchwood); it is difficult to disagree with you, because the story is usually far more developed. The obvious reason being television has more time to develop characters and story.

One of the large problems with T.V. is selection is often based on what the mass market and the networks like. Some of the television shows I enjoyed the most were nixed just when they were getting good; Firefly, Brisco County Jr to name two. Reasons for shows I like being canceled are often inane e.g, "let's put it up against monday night football and see what happens."

I am not into Lost, or the various reality shows and most of the comedy does not amuse me. I will say that the television I don't like has improved in quality across the board, but I still want more. Currently only British Television is making me want to keep watching.

I do like the fact that with movies, I can find some low budget independent with a meaningful story quickly and easily and don't have to worry about the contrived formulas used to hook viewers (Lost and the cliffhanger ending for example). So, even though you have plenty of valid points, for me television isn't quite there yet (outside of Dr Who)

All of that said I am very interested in the new Bionic Woman show.

Gillionaire

Gillionaire

Manchester, NH
February 2007

SEP 14, 2007 02:56 PM

Honestly, while there are some great tv series out there right now (I'm hooked on the new Doctor Who), I still love seeing a good movie. I dunno, the experience is different. Sometimes I'm just in the mood for the self-contained two-hour or so story-telling experience of a movie rather then a tv show that has 26 or so hours of story I need to catch up on or dedicate to it.

But Chris, your average movie night costs $80? I haven't paid more then $15 for a movie night by myself, or more then $50 if I'm pre-paying for a group. Though I will agree, people stopped knowing how to be respectful of other audience members in a theater about a decade ago and it only seems to get worse.

Gillionaire

Gillionaire

Manchester, NH
February 2007

SEP 14, 2007 02:57 PM

TedKoppel said:
Plus, how can you question the quality of movies on the very day that Dragon Wars begins showing?



Jesus Christ. How that movie escaped Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie double feature night with Mega Snake, I'll never understand.

Chris_Gore

Chris_Gore

Los Angeles, CA
September 2005

SEP 14, 2007 03:33 PM

Gillionaire said:
But Chris, your average movie night costs $80? I haven't paid more then $15 for a movie night by myself, or more then $50 if I'm pre-paying for a group. Though I will agree, people stopped knowing how to be respectful of other audience members in a theater about a decade ago and it only seems to get worse.



Well, if I go with myself and a special lady friend, I'm paying for two tix, plus refreshments and parking. About 40-50 total. But a family of four pays a lot more, I was working off an average. Anyway, that's the basis of my figures. It can be a lot cheaper with an afternoon screening too.

TedKoppel

TedKoppel

Glendale, AZ
March 2004

SEP 14, 2007 03:37 PM

Gillionaire said:

TedKoppel said:
Plus, how can you question the quality of movies on the very day that Dragon Wars begins showing?



Jesus Christ. How that movie escaped Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie double feature night with Mega Snake, I'll never understand.


In a world...where dragons have rocket launchers and are attacking downtown Los Angeles...

gcash056

gcash056

Orlando, FL
October 2004

SEP 14, 2007 04:56 PM

I only went to the last Harry Potter because it was IMAX 3D

Before that, the last 3 movies I'd seen was the three Star Wars turdlets. I think before that, the last movie I saw was "Toy Story"

Are you getting the feeling I don't watch movies?

And except for Battlestar Galactica, I've not watched any of the series you've mentioned. I honestly don't even know what "LOST" is about.

I watch "Harry Dresden" on Sci-FI, "Modern Marvels" & "Dogfights" on History Channel, MotoGP on Speed, "Dirty Jobs" and "Deadliest Catch" on Discovery, "How It's Made" on Science, a ton of shit on Military Channel, "Feasting on Asphalt" on the Food Channel, as well as NASA Select when there's a Shuttle mission flying.

That's MY "don't miss" list. I don't watch the "plebian channels" that the commoners watch.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

PreviousNext

Barack "Blunder" Obama

Comments 153 Comments - Last Comment 4 days ago

OMG APOCALYPSE 2012!!

Comments 113 Comments - Last Comment 2 days ago

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #55

Comments 104 Comments - Last Comment 2 days ago

Right Wing WALL-E Meltdown

Comments 86 Comments - Last Comment 3 days ago

Jimmy Fucking Carter

Comments 84 Comments - Last Comment 28 minutes ago
Member: pb

pb

Life Is Ugly So Why Not Kill Yourself*

Last Comment 10 MIN

the fact that most organized religions predict eternal damnation as a result of suicide tells me it's... More ...

Jimmy Fucking Carter

Last Comment 28 MIN by RedBstrd

Jimmy Fucking Carter

Last Comment 28 MIN

I did not suggest that you were racist like him. I don't think the parallel between Ron Paul and David... More ...

Comic Con 2008

Last Comment 1 HR by Margot_Dent

Comic Con 2008

Last Comment 1 HR

Infinite Horizon is a great book! Good luck, Gerry. More ...

Abandon All Hope: Fatalist Love

Last Comment 1 HR

Or, rather, isn't an apples and oranges distinction, he meant to say. More ...

US Secretly Funding Iranian Insurgency?

Last Comment 2 HR

it's not like he's said anything that isn't on CNN. More ...

Filthy Rich Socialism

Last Comment 7 HR by Sick

Filthy Rich Socialism

Last Comment 7 HR

Another reason not to nationalize Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae is that it would increase our total public... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Terry Zwigoff
SuicideGirls Interview: Tura Satana
SuicideGirls Interview: Crispin Hellion Glover: It Is Fine! Everything Is Fine