ya I get what you mean.....FistFuck had a great potential set that got turned down....they seem to go through cycles of sets that look a lot alike though so maybe the rough looking ones will have a comeback soon

Dont mean to toot my own horn, but that last thing said about doing a first set with a sisters crappy camera, thats kinda the problem right there ... do you really think pictures from some consumer $100-200 made-for-shooting-grannies-bday-party camera is going to be able to compete with the photos done by skilled artists in the photography field, with cameras in the +$1,000-$3,000 price range?
Besides that, I HAVE that kind of camera, and have been offering my skilled services for FREE for two years now... and i'm most definatly NOT the only one out there... Modeling is not like dating, you dont just sign up onto a site and wait for them to come crawling to you (they have work to do, with others who are activly searching for their services). Most of us photographers dont want to seem pushy or clingy, we dont like messaging countless 'potentials' every day looking for those few actually interested ... Those interested should be working at LEAST equally hard to find the photographers as they are trying to find them.

EDIT: I'm not saying that the shots have to look all Pro and all that prop filled fake kind of stuff.... but at least working with someone who really knows what their doing with a camera doing your photos when your trying to get them onto a site like this.

Just my two cents.

I completely agree with you on that. However, I think they should still have a good resolution, and not like a fuzzy phone cam or something.

i tend to agree, i like the natural shoots, i figure the best representation is in natural light (well diffused)

here is a nice outdoor shoot i just fell apon:
Moirai