Music

TOPICS:

3/1/03

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

435 | 436 | 437

 ... 470

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

MoHollyweird

MoHollyweird

Los Angeles, CA
December 2002

JAN 13, 2003 03:23 PM

oh Pete, not Pete.........
He's a arrogent prick, but I wouldn't have him any other way. I really hope this isn't going to kill his ass, lifes been kinda' harsh lately. I hope this ain't proven to be true. eeek

Kurtz

Kurtz

Cape Girardeau, MO
August 2002

JAN 13, 2003 03:26 PM

oh no........ eeek eeek confused shocked shocked frown

MoHollyweird

MoHollyweird

Los Angeles, CA
December 2002

JAN 13, 2003 03:28 PM

ditto.... frown

Smatt

smatt

United Kingdom
November 2002

JAN 13, 2003 03:29 PM

According to AOL:
'A Scotland Yard spokesman said: 'He has been arrested under the Protection of Children Act 1978 on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children, suspicion of making indecent images of children and on suspicion of incitement to distribute indecent images of children."'

metrognome

metrognome

I'm lost
November 2002

JAN 13, 2003 03:29 PM

if you believe the London media, this is pretty much crap. apparently someone on his IP checked a child porn site once (keep in mind he has a young-ish son), and as such that put him on a "flagged list" as the registered owner of said address. what with the recent Gary Glitter arrest, they're going after any and all high-profile members of said list. *shrug* i think it's bullshit.

aoife

aoife

Hilton Head Island, SC
October 2002

JAN 13, 2003 03:53 PM

I think it's funny...but maybe I'm just sick smile

snakepiss

snakepiss

Canada
November 2002

JAN 13, 2003 04:00 PM

I heard about this on the radio. They said that he admitted he checked out a kiddie-porn web site, but only for research purposes because he was making an autobiogrophy, and he was molested as a child or some shit. That's my take on the deal anyway, Pete's still a rocker.

Karry_Ling

Karry_Ling

Oklahoma City, OK
OLD SKOOL

JAN 13, 2003 04:03 PM

to tell you the truth im not shocked

Cherry

Cherry

SUICIDEGIRL

British Columbia, Canada

JAN 13, 2003 04:24 PM

metrognome said:
if you believe the London media, this is pretty much crap. apparently someone on his IP checked a child porn site once (keep in mind he has a young-ish son), and as such that put him on a "flagged list" as the registered owner of said address. what with the recent Gary Glitter arrest, they're going after any and all high-profile members of said list. *shrug* i think it's bullshit.




Yeah, I think you're believing fan rumour there.

This has been big news in the UK the last few days.

As snake piss said he has openly admitted that he checked out the site, but he said it was as 'research'.

He said that he had suffered abuse as a child and was going to write a book about it + the site was part of some background research.

This was his official police statement and his official press statement. So I guess the guy is guilty in one way.

puke

But if he'd wanted it for research why didn't he just ask Scotland Yard for case history + examples?!

It's all dodgy. Whether he has a young son or not doesn't mean he doesn't like child porn. There's been several conviced child pornographers who have had their own children. In fact a lot of them use their own children. Sick as it is, it's true.

Cherry xx

twincitiesburnin

twincitiesburnin

Minneapolis, MN
OLD SKOOL

JAN 13, 2003 04:25 PM

I'm still in petes corner for now.
he has not been charged with anything and I believe his side of the story so far.we'll see...

Lolita

Lolita

SUICIDEGIRL

Oregon, USA

JAN 13, 2003 07:01 PM

SAY IT AINT SO!

lifeinrewind

lifeinrewind

I'm lost
OLD SKOOL

JAN 13, 2003 07:14 PM

I just don't know about anything anymore frown

If he can prove it was for research then I believe he should be let go. There still should be an investigation since he does have a child after that tho because sexual abuse is a nasty continous cycle

daggx

daggx

North York, ON
December 2002

JAN 13, 2003 07:16 PM

From what I've heard he was initaly busted because he used his credit card to pay for access to the sight. However he does claim that he was doing reasearch for this book of his and that he talked to the police about it befor he did it. So I guess we'll just have to wait and see what the courts have to say. surreal

Prudence

prudence

I'm lost
October 2002

JAN 13, 2003 07:17 PM

god.

not the who!

why?????

moondaddy

moondaddy

Houston, TX
January 2003

JAN 14, 2003 02:20 AM

Anyone who's curious about what's going on with Pete really should read this article:

http://www.hecktow.com/pete.html

He wrote it himself, and posted it on his website a year ago, but it was recently taken down.

It really goes quite a long way to explain what Pete has been up to. So check it out, seriously

~ moon

[Edited on Jan 14, 2003 by moondaddy]

SkottieDanger

SkottieDanger

Georgia
OLD SKOOL

JAN 14, 2003 04:00 AM

i guess pete needs to know that the *kids are NOT alright*

this is sad. i hope that this charge...true or not... does not shadow the great music this man has made.

child porn is ridiculous and just not acceptable in any form. anyone who is into it is selfish and self centered to think his/her libido can run rampant over the life of a young person.

open statement to pete:

was an 'essay' worth all this?

superfly4343

superfly4343

Canada
December 2002

JAN 14, 2003 06:29 AM

moondaddy said:
Anyone who's curious about what's going on with Pete really should read this article:

http://www.hecktow.com/pete.html

He wrote it himself, and posted it on his website a year ago, but it was recently taken down.

It really goes quite a long way to explain what Pete has been up to. So check it out, seriously

~ moon

[Edited on Jan 14, 2003 by moondaddy]



moon

Thanks for the great link. This taken with the imagery Townshend put in Tommy does shed light on motivations. There is more to this story to come, I hope the hysteria and innuendo that the British tabloids can swirl about with impunity will be taken with a large grain of salt.



MoHollyweird

MoHollyweird

Los Angeles, CA
December 2002

JAN 14, 2003 11:54 AM

moondaddy said:
Anyone who's curious about what's going on with Pete really should read this article:

http://www.hecktow.com/pete.html

He wrote it himself, and posted it on his website a year ago, but it was recently taken down.

It really goes quite a long way to explain what Pete has been up to. So check it out, seriously

~ moon

[Edited on Jan 14, 2003 by moondaddy]



I second that, that is a GREAT FUCKING link. I sweet lord hope that Petes cleared of this charge, I really do. I remember watching Tommy when I was 12, and being scared and understandind.....something....
Pete's writing of it is reall now explained alot for Me. confused

Linz

Linz

SUICIDEGIRL

I'm lost

JAN 14, 2003 12:15 PM

man, pete is the shit, dude... i'm blue.

sXesam

sXesam

Tucson, AZ
January 2003

JAN 14, 2003 12:23 PM

FREE PETE. Who's makin' the t-shirts? smile

nageboorte

nageboorte

San Francisco, CA
January 2003

JAN 14, 2003 12:25 PM

That link is brilliant. Unfortunatly the Sun, Mirror, and even the Evening Standard will proceed to overplay this as Pete being a paedophile.
I hope that more innocent people within the uk & europe dont get burned at the stake during this "witch-hunt"

FineAndDandy

fineanddandy

Seattle, WA
January 2003

JAN 14, 2003 12:29 PM

moondaddy said:
Anyone who's curious about what's going on with Pete really should read this article:

http://www.hecktow.com/pete.html

He wrote it himself, and posted it on his website a year ago, but it was recently taken down.

It really goes quite a long way to explain what Pete has been up to. So check it out, seriously

~ moon

[Edited on Jan 14, 2003 by moondaddy]



yeah, great link. i've loved The Who and Pete's stuff for 20 years. he always gets into trouble when he speaks his mind. people would rather keep their heads in the sand. i'm on his side for now, and appreciate the bringing of this problem to publics mind.

moondaddy

moondaddy

Houston, TX
January 2003

JAN 15, 2003 11:56 AM

Trousers said:
That link is brilliant. Unfortunatly the Sun, Mirror, and even the Evening Standard will proceed to overplay this as Pete being a paedophile.



Yep, in fact the Sun has already jumped on the tabloid bandwagon and published a story that quotes parts of "A Different Bomb" - the article I linked to above - totally out of context, in a transparent effort to make Pete look like a shameless pervert:

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003021108,00.html

The Sun totally ignores the main thrust of Pete's article, which is that he loathes child pornography with a passion, and is horrified at how easy it is to find it on the internet.

Again, Pete's full article, "A Different Bomb," which was written a full year ago, can be found here in HTML:

http://www.hecktow.com/pete.html

or from Pete's domain in PDF format:

http://www.petetownshend.co.uk/media/020116adifferentbomb.pdf

Again, anyone who is upset by these news reports on Pete really owes to themselves to read his article. There is way more to this whole thing than meets the eye.

~ moon

[Edited on Jan 15, 2003 by moondaddy]

superfly4343

superfly4343

Canada
December 2002

MAR 03, 2003 12:23 PM

Let's bump this up and get an update. Now that the frenzy seems to have died down....

Pete has proof!!! Why did the Judas' deny him?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next