This week, and hopefully in the weeks to come, I'm here to bring you some of the big news stories from your friends to the north. As I'm writing this, I am stuffed full of poutine (with bacon and onions), chugging a Maudite, and watching the Edmonton Oilers. Now that I've got the bad Canada jokes out of the way, let's get on with the news.
Canada has never really been known for churning out brutal murderers, but every nowandthen, they pop up.
Sixty-one women, mostly prostitutes and drug addicts, had disappeared from this area since 1983. Numerous public outcries had accused the Royal Canadian Mounted Police of ignoring the growing number of cases. Many feared that a single, disturbed person may be behind the rash of abductions. Finally, in 1999, the RCMP began to take things seriously.
In the spring of 1999, two Vancouver detectives teamed up with two RCMP detectives to review the file pertaining to the 31 missing women. In August of that year police began investigating an account by a woman, not a prostitute, who said that a man snatched her from the stairwell of a hotel in Vancouver's downtown eastside. The woman jumped from her captor's moving vehicle to escape.
Now, we jump ahead to 2002 and introduce the star of our story, Robert William Pickton. Pickton's pig farm, located just outside of Vancouver in Port Coquitlam, quickly became the focal point of the police investigation. Seven murder charges would be filed that summer. More charges would be filed in September and October, and, by the end of the year, the total would reach fifteen.
After years of sitting on their back-bacon-loving duffs, the RCMP (and their team of anthropologists) were up to their eyes in pig shit and very tiny pieces of dead hookers ... and probably loving back bacon a little less. The search of Pickton's farm uncovered disturbing new evidence, and eventually brought the number of charges up to twenty-six.
And so, in December 2006, the trial began. The prosecution decided to proceed with the six strongest cases, reserving the other twenty for a later date. The trial, which lasted just over a year, captivated and disgusted the nation. Week after week, a nation which normally considers itself fairly safe and well-balanced, was exposed to a monster hiding among them. Finally, in December, the jury returned with their verdict.
Pickton was acquitted of the first-degree murder charges. All six of them. Not to fear, the jurors weren't complete muppets. They found Pickton guilty of six second-degree murder charges, and he was sentenced to six concurrent life sentences with no chance of parole for 25 years. He is set to rot in jail until he dies. Somewhere, someone is taking bets on a mess hall shanking.
And that brief synopsis brings us to now.
The Crown filed an appeal today, hoping to re-try Pickton in an effort to get the first-degree convictions. They have asserted that Justice James Williams erred in presiding over the case, and that his errors led to the rejection of the first-degree charges.
The notice of appeal filed by the Crown is called a "Crown appeal against acquittal" even though Pickton was found guilty on six counts of second-degree murder. The Crown will argue in the Appeal Court that Pickton should not have been acquitted by the jury on six counts of first-degree murder.
In layman's terms: The judge fucked up, and they want a chance to really nail Pickton to the wall.
Pickton's lawyers are also expected to file appeals this week. They will obviously be trying to keep him out of jail, rather than having him locked away for the rest of his natural life.
Oh, and if you were wondering what happened to the other twenty murder charges… you're not alone. As of this writing, there are no firm plans to try Robert Pickton for the other murders to which he has been linked. He is already going to jail, and his chances of ever walking free are on par with my Oilers' chances of winning the Stanley Cup this year. It has been suggested, at least on talk radio and in lunch rooms, that the cost and effort of additional trials would be better used to assist the people Pickton preyed on for years, the desperate women of downtown Vancouver. Right now, the focus remains on the current trial and what will no doubt be a lengthy appeals process.
Rest assured I'll be back with updates as the story progresses.
FreakPirate really hates talking in the third person, but desperately wanted to put some italics at the end of this story. I hope you've enjoyed hearing about Canada and I'd love to hear your responses and criticisms.
i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.
DevilsReject said:
i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.
I have to admit, I'm not entirely familiar with the ins and outs of Canadian law either. However, my understanding is that, for reasons I don't understand, the sentences are to be served concurrently. Either way, a life sentence is a life sentence. It's not like he can die in jail six times over.
Yes, he'd be 83 and unlikely to be paroled, but the victims' families (and the Canadian government, I'm sure) probably don't ever want to see that happen.
crispy said:
Yeah, but dude's eligible for parole in 25 years.
Yes, he'd be 83 and unlikely to be paroled, but the victims' families (and the Canadian government, I'm sure) probably don't ever want to see that happen.
That's how it works in Canada. He won't be paroled. The hearing would pretty much consist of Pickton walking in to see the parole board, the board laughing, giving him the finger and kicking him back to a dank hole.
And in reference to getting shanked. I have a feeling a pig farmer who slaughters 61 women isn't easy to kill.
9
cirdt
Edmonton, AB
February 2004
JAN 08, 2008 10:23 PM
Shh... you're giving away our Northern secrets.
You know, that the dark side to all that Canadian politeness is that occasionally someone can't deal with apologizing anymore and, instead, they lose it and murder dozens of prostitutes.
Thumbs up to the idea of donating the costs of unnecessary further trials to social programs rather than throwing it away in a quest for vengeance, but pretty unlikely, don't you think? The legal system isn't known for throwing away precedent in favor of practicality.
Thumbs up to the idea of donating the costs of unnecessary further trials to social programs rather than throwing it away in a quest for vengeance, but pretty unlikely, don't you think? The legal system isn't known for throwing away precedent in favor of practicality.
I think it would be wonderful. But yes... very unlikely. I'm really hoping they won't try to drag out another trial.
PaulNikon said:
And in reference to getting shanked. I have a feeling a pig farmer who slaughters 61 women isn't easy to kill.
even in the rainbow and unicorn laden prison system of our cousin to the north, i think a 53 year old serial rapist and murder has a slim to shit chance of surviving long.
DevilsReject said:
i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.
I have to admit, I'm not entirely familiar with the ins and outs of Canadian law either. However, my understanding is that, for reasons I don't understand, the sentences are to be served concurrently. Either way, a life sentence is a life sentence. It's not like he can die in jail six times over.
I don't have a clue what the rates or probability of release are but here in the states and from the sound of it in your article a Life sentence is not actually a life sentence. It's 25 years, and then he can be released on parole.
Considering the extra heinous nature of this mans crimes I think you are correct to presume he will never be seeing freedom again, but a Life Sentence isn't really a life sentence if you can get paroled.
I don't have a clue what the rates or probability of release are but here in the states and from the sound of it in your article a Life sentence is not actually a life sentence. It's 25 years, and then he can be released on parole.
Considering the extra heinous nature of this mans crimes I think you are correct to presume he will never be seeing freedom again, but a Life Sentence isn't really a life sentence if you can get paroled.
That's how the Canadian law works. You are eligible for parole after a maximum of 25 years. I don't know why. I don't make the laws.
That's how the Canadian law works. You are eligible for parole after a maximum of 25 years. I don't know why. I don't make the laws.
I moved out to Vancouver this fall, so I wasn't here for more than the tail end of the trial, but the general reaction to the conviction was celebration. Yeah, it's great that he got convicted, but divide 25 by 6 and that'll tell you what the Canadian justice system seems to think each of those womens' lives are worth.
DevilsReject said:
i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.
I have to admit, I'm not entirely familiar with the ins and outs of Canadian law either. However, my understanding is that, for reasons I don't understand, the sentences are to be served concurrently. Either way, a life sentence is a life sentence. It's not like he can die in jail six times over.
I don't have a clue what the rates or probability of release are but here in the states and from the sound of it in your article a Life sentence is not actually a life sentence. It's 25 years, and then he can be released on parole.
Considering the extra heinous nature of this mans crimes I think you are correct to presume he will never be seeing freedom again, but a Life Sentence isn't really a life sentence if you can get paroled.
You have to admit, it'd be kind of satisfying to see him paroled for the six murders after 25 years and then get slammed with the other 20 murder charges. No statute of limitations on murder, after all.
FreakPirate
Edmonton, AB
November 2002
JAN 08, 2008 08:11 PM