Lifestyle

TOPICS:

1/16/08

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14

 ... 878

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Edmonton, AB
November 2002

JAN 08, 2008 08:11 PM

This week, and hopefully in the weeks to come, I'm here to bring you some of the big news stories from your friends to the north. As I'm writing this, I am stuffed full of poutine (with bacon and onions), chugging a Maudite, and watching the Edmonton Oilers. Now that I've got the bad Canada jokes out of the way, let's get on with the news.



Canada has never really been known for churning out brutal murderers, but every now and then, they pop up.



Today, The Crown announced that it would be seeking new charges to be laid against notorious pig farmer/prostitute solicitor/lunatic Robert Pickton.

For those of you who aren't really aware of the case, here's a little history:



The setting: east downtown Vancouver.



Sixty-one women, mostly prostitutes and drug addicts, had disappeared from this area since 1983. Numerous public outcries had accused the Royal Canadian Mounted Police of ignoring the growing number of cases. Many feared that a single, disturbed person may be behind the rash of abductions. Finally, in 1999, the RCMP began to take things seriously.



In the spring of 1999, two Vancouver detectives teamed up with two RCMP detectives to review the file pertaining to the 31 missing women. In August of that year police began investigating an account by a woman, not a prostitute, who said that a man snatched her from the stairwell of a hotel in Vancouver's downtown eastside. The woman jumped from her captor's moving vehicle to escape.





Now, we jump ahead to 2002 and introduce the star of our story, Robert William Pickton. Pickton's pig farm, located just outside of Vancouver in Port Coquitlam, quickly became the focal point of the police investigation. Seven murder charges would be filed that summer. More charges would be filed in September and October, and, by the end of the year, the total would reach fifteen.



After years of sitting on their back-bacon-loving duffs, the RCMP (and their team of anthropologists) were up to their eyes in pig shit and very tiny pieces of dead hookers ... and probably loving back bacon a little less. The search of Pickton's farm uncovered disturbing new evidence, and eventually brought the number of charges up to twenty-six.



And so, in December 2006, the trial began. The prosecution decided to proceed with the six strongest cases, reserving the other twenty for a later date. The trial, which lasted just over a year, captivated and disgusted the nation. Week after week, a nation which normally considers itself fairly safe and well-balanced, was exposed to a monster hiding among them. Finally, in December, the jury returned with their verdict.



Pickton was acquitted of the first-degree murder charges. All six of them. Not to fear, the jurors weren't complete muppets. They found Pickton guilty of six second-degree murder charges, and he was sentenced to six concurrent life sentences with no chance of parole for 25 years. He is set to rot in jail until he dies. Somewhere, someone is taking bets on a mess hall shanking.



And that brief synopsis brings us to now.



The Crown filed an appeal today, hoping to re-try Pickton in an effort to get the first-degree convictions. They have asserted that Justice James Williams erred in presiding over the case, and that his errors led to the rejection of the first-degree charges.



The notice of appeal filed by the Crown is called a "Crown appeal against acquittal" even though Pickton was found guilty on six counts of second-degree murder. The Crown will argue in the Appeal Court that Pickton should not have been acquitted by the jury on six counts of first-degree murder.





In layman's terms: The judge fucked up, and they want a chance to really nail Pickton to the wall.



Pickton's lawyers are also expected to file appeals this week. They will obviously be trying to keep him out of jail, rather than having him locked away for the rest of his natural life.



Oh, and if you were wondering what happened to the other twenty murder charges… you're not alone. As of this writing, there are no firm plans to try Robert Pickton for the other murders to which he has been linked. He is already going to jail, and his chances of ever walking free are on par with my Oilers' chances of winning the Stanley Cup this year. It has been suggested, at least on talk radio and in lunch rooms, that the cost and effort of additional trials would be better used to assist the people Pickton preyed on for years, the desperate women of downtown Vancouver. Right now, the focus remains on the current trial and what will no doubt be a lengthy appeals process.



Rest assured I'll be back with updates as the story progresses.



FreakPirate really hates talking in the third person, but desperately wanted to put some italics at the end of this story. I hope you've enjoyed hearing about Canada and I'd love to hear your responses and criticisms.



Oh, and I still eat Canadian pork.




punk

punk

NEWSWIRE

Phoenix, AZ

JAN 08, 2008 09:01 PM

All I want to say is that I'm a big fan of Canadian bacon.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

JAN 08, 2008 09:06 PM

i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Edmonton, AB
November 2002

JAN 08, 2008 09:08 PM

DevilsReject said:
i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.



I have to admit, I'm not entirely familiar with the ins and outs of Canadian law either. However, my understanding is that, for reasons I don't understand, the sentences are to be served concurrently. Either way, a life sentence is a life sentence. It's not like he can die in jail six times over.

crispy

crispy

NEWSWIRE

Philadelphia, PA

JAN 08, 2008 09:18 PM

Yeah, but dude's eligible for parole in 25 years.

Yes, he'd be 83 and unlikely to be paroled, but the victims' families (and the Canadian government, I'm sure) probably don't ever want to see that happen.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Edmonton, AB
November 2002

JAN 08, 2008 09:32 PM

crispy said:
Yeah, but dude's eligible for parole in 25 years.

Yes, he'd be 83 and unlikely to be paroled, but the victims' families (and the Canadian government, I'm sure) probably don't ever want to see that happen.



That's how it works in Canada. He won't be paroled. The hearing would pretty much consist of Pickton walking in to see the parole board, the board laughing, giving him the finger and kicking him back to a dank hole.

PaulNikon

PaulNikon

Melbourne, FL
February 2003

JAN 08, 2008 09:38 PM

punk said:
All I want to say is that I'm a big fan of Canadian bacon.



Can't get enough of it.

PaulNikon

PaulNikon

Melbourne, FL
February 2003

JAN 08, 2008 09:40 PM

And in reference to getting shanked. I have a feeling a pig farmer who slaughters 61 women isn't easy to kill.

cirdt

cirdt

Edmonton, AB
February 2004

JAN 08, 2008 10:23 PM

Shh... you're giving away our Northern secrets.

You know, that the dark side to all that Canadian politeness is that occasionally someone can't deal with apologizing anymore and, instead, they lose it and murder dozens of prostitutes. smile

Thumbs up to the idea of donating the costs of unnecessary further trials to social programs rather than throwing it away in a quest for vengeance, but pretty unlikely, don't you think? The legal system isn't known for throwing away precedent in favor of practicality.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Edmonton, AB
November 2002

JAN 08, 2008 10:46 PM

cirdt said:

Thumbs up to the idea of donating the costs of unnecessary further trials to social programs rather than throwing it away in a quest for vengeance, but pretty unlikely, don't you think? The legal system isn't known for throwing away precedent in favor of practicality.



I think it would be wonderful. But yes... very unlikely. I'm really hoping they won't try to drag out another trial.

atomicant

atomicant

Portland, OR
June 2003

JAN 08, 2008 10:50 PM

PaulNikon said:
And in reference to getting shanked. I have a feeling a pig farmer who slaughters 61 women isn't easy to kill.



even in the rainbow and unicorn laden prison system of our cousin to the north, i think a 53 year old serial rapist and murder has a slim to shit chance of surviving long.



and never trust a man who owns a pig farm.

Kindle

Kindle

Billerica, MA
March 2006

JAN 08, 2008 10:52 PM

PaulNikon said:

punk said:
All I want to say is that I'm a big fan of Canadian bacon.



Can't get enough of it.


Yumm.

J24U

J24U

Danvers, MA
February 2006

JAN 09, 2008 07:27 AM

Is it sad that the detail that sticks with me is...
Poutine, with onions and bacon. Why the fuck didn't I think of that shit before?

Chainlink

Chainlink

Dickeyville, WI
August 2005

JAN 09, 2008 08:17 AM

FreakPirate said:

DevilsReject said:
i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.



I have to admit, I'm not entirely familiar with the ins and outs of Canadian law either. However, my understanding is that, for reasons I don't understand, the sentences are to be served concurrently. Either way, a life sentence is a life sentence. It's not like he can die in jail six times over.



I don't have a clue what the rates or probability of release are but here in the states and from the sound of it in your article a Life sentence is not actually a life sentence. It's 25 years, and then he can be released on parole.
Considering the extra heinous nature of this mans crimes I think you are correct to presume he will never be seeing freedom again, but a Life Sentence isn't really a life sentence if you can get paroled.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

Charleston, SC
August 2004

JAN 09, 2008 08:18 AM

punk said:
All I want to say is that I'm a big fan of Canadian bacon.


me too

Kindle

Kindle

Billerica, MA
March 2006

JAN 09, 2008 09:41 AM

MrCrisp said:

punk said:
All I want to say is that I'm a big fan of Canadian bacon.


me too


Buwahahaha.

d20

d20

San Francisco, CA
September 2003

JAN 09, 2008 10:23 AM

MrCrisp said:

punk said:
All I want to say is that I'm a big fan of Canadian bacon.


me too



When have you ever heard anyone say, "Honey, lets stay in and order Canadian food"?

sitar

sitar

Philadelphia, PA
June 2004

JAN 09, 2008 10:43 AM

atomicant said:



and never trust a man who owns a pig farm.



this would be my only comment.

PaulNikon

PaulNikon

Melbourne, FL
February 2003

JAN 09, 2008 12:09 PM

sitar said:

atomicant said:



and never trust a man who owns a pig farm.



this would be my only comment.



I think of this man whenever I order tea. Although, I do prefer sugar. So I don't use the "I am sweet enough" line.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Edmonton, AB
November 2002

JAN 09, 2008 08:24 PM

Chainlink said:

I don't have a clue what the rates or probability of release are but here in the states and from the sound of it in your article a Life sentence is not actually a life sentence. It's 25 years, and then he can be released on parole.
Considering the extra heinous nature of this mans crimes I think you are correct to presume he will never be seeing freedom again, but a Life Sentence isn't really a life sentence if you can get paroled.



That's how the Canadian law works. You are eligible for parole after a maximum of 25 years. I don't know why. I don't make the laws.

_DictionaryGirl_

_DictionaryGirl_

NEWSWIRE

San Diego, CA

JAN 09, 2008 08:47 PM

I will never set foot on a farm. You can't make me. surreal

Postblank

Postblank

New Brunswick, NJ
June 2004

JAN 09, 2008 09:32 PM

_DictionaryGirl_ said:
I will never set foot on a farm. You can't make me. surreal


I hate to be the one to tell you this, but that's an impossible scenario. People on farms in real life don't read books.

GonzoChaote

GonzoChaote

Vancouver, BC
March 2007

JAN 10, 2008 01:17 AM

FreakPirate said:

That's how the Canadian law works. You are eligible for parole after a maximum of 25 years. I don't know why. I don't make the laws.



I moved out to Vancouver this fall, so I wasn't here for more than the tail end of the trial, but the general reaction to the conviction was celebration. Yeah, it's great that he got convicted, but divide 25 by 6 and that'll tell you what the Canadian justice system seems to think each of those womens' lives are worth.

Aquarian

Aquarian

Ireland
December 2005

JAN 10, 2008 07:06 AM

Postblank said:

_DictionaryGirl_ said:
I will never set foot on a farm. You can't make me. surreal


I hate to be the one to tell you this, but that's an impossible scenario. People on farms in real life don't read books.



That's a bible, don't ya know that's how farmers can tell what punishment they get for fucking some animal wink

Ascanius

Ascanius

South Royalton, VT
October 2006

JAN 10, 2008 07:53 AM

Chainlink said:

FreakPirate said:

DevilsReject said:
i have no clue how Canadian law works, but wouldn't a conviction of six murders put him away for multiple life sentences? I know it would appeal to the family of the other 20 victims, to put them at ease, but i can kind of see why they are just concentrating on the six.



I have to admit, I'm not entirely familiar with the ins and outs of Canadian law either. However, my understanding is that, for reasons I don't understand, the sentences are to be served concurrently. Either way, a life sentence is a life sentence. It's not like he can die in jail six times over.



I don't have a clue what the rates or probability of release are but here in the states and from the sound of it in your article a Life sentence is not actually a life sentence. It's 25 years, and then he can be released on parole.
Considering the extra heinous nature of this mans crimes I think you are correct to presume he will never be seeing freedom again, but a Life Sentence isn't really a life sentence if you can get paroled.



You have to admit, it'd be kind of satisfying to see him paroled for the six murders after 25 years and then get slammed with the other 20 murder charges. No statute of limitations on murder, after all.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next