Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

162 | 163 | 164

 ... 484

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 09:29 AM




from PMSNBC

In a rare occurrence, the CIA fired an officer who acknowledged giving classified information to a reporter, NBC News learned Friday.

The officer flunked a polygraph exam before being fired on Thursday and is now under investigation by the Justice Department, NBC has learned.

Intelligence sources tell NBC News the accused officer, Mary McCarthy, worked in the CIA's inspector general's office and had worked for the National Security Council under the Clinton and and George W. Bush administrations.

The leak pertained to stories on the CIA’s rumored secret prisons in Eastern Europe, sources told NBC. The information was allegedly provided to Dana Priest of the Washington Post, who wrote about CIA prisons in November and was awarded a Pulitzer Prize on Monday for her reporting.

Sources said the CIA believes McCarthy had more than a dozen unauthorized contacts with Priest. Information about subjects other than the prisons may have been leaked as well.

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the firing.

CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Millerwise confirmed the dismissal. Millerwise said she was unsure whether there had ever been a firing before at the agency for leaking to the media.



Having hung, drawn and quartered Scooter Libby leaking stuff to the press, I wonder if the Liberal - sorry "Main Stream" media will be quite so vigourous in the pursuit of truth and justice when it comes to Mary McCarthy.

I mean McCarthy's crime involved the leaking of actual, important secrets - rather than just the name of a CIA desk jockey (that was already known to the press anyway).

I somehow doubt it. Why? Because McCarthy, it seems was a hardcore Kerry supporter and I can't imagine the press will be in too much of a hurry to let it be known that they and she leaked national secrets to help a Democratic party political agenda.

kudos to Ace of Spades for wrecking any pretensions that Libs might like to sow about McCarthy being a non-partisan "spy with a conscience"

McCarthy, Mary O
10/5/2004
$5,000.00
Bethesda, MD 20817
Center for Strategic & International [Contribution]
OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY

1,512 . Mccarthy, Mary O
3/14/2004
$2,000.00
Bethesda, MD 20817
U.S. Government/Analyst [Contribution]
JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT, INC.


I don't know for a fact that this is the same Mary McCarthy, but her location (just outside of DC) and her occupation (U.S. Government/Analyst-- totally CIA) do seem to match up.

Does it matter she's a big-money donor to Kerry and the Democrats?

Well, let's ask the question the opposite way. If she was caught leaking secret information that damaged a Clinton Administration, and was a big donor to Jeb Bush and the Ohio State Republicans, do you think the MSM would note that in passing?

The CIA is politicized, and some liberals have lost their goddamned minds. There is no limit any longer to what they are willing to do to subvert the current democratically elected government and claw their way back to power.


To find McCarthy in the list of political donors, go here, chose the 2002-2006 election cycles, enter "McCarthy," and then scan down for "Mary." You can't find her if you just type in "Mary McCarthy." Not sure why.

And I also can't post the link to the search results. You just have to go there and do the search yourself.

Here's one FEC disclosure report The image for the Kerry donation isn't scanned yet, it seems.



a later update on the same page seems to confirm that the Mary McCarthy sacked for leaking national secrets was working to a Democrat party agenda:

A "Michael McCarthy," listed as her husband in the article, also lives in Bethesda with the same zip code, and he too donated to Kerry in 2004.

I looked for this at the site I was on for confirmation, but didn't find a Michael with a Bethesda address. I guess I just missed it, though, because a second check yields:

,623 . Mccarthy, Michael J
3/14/2004 $2,000.00
Bethesda, MD 20817
Michael Mccarthy Associates/Landsca [Contribution]
JOHN KERRY FOR PRESIDENT INC [View Image]

1,624 . MCCARTHY, MICHAEL J
3/2/2004 $500.00
BETHESDA, MD 20817
MCCARTHY ASSOC [Contribution]
MIKULSKI FOR SENATE COMMITTEE



John "Jenjis Khan" Kerry. Babs Mikulski.

So, you know, I just can't wait until we're all assured that these are political centrists who "vote Democrat sometimes, Republican other times" and that Mary McCarthy illegally leaked classified information only out of a sense of "higher patriotism."



I'll hold my breath and wait for this scandal to be plastered all over CNN et al...actually, no - I'd better not.


[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by UpTight]

[Edited on Apr 26, 2006 by UpTight]

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 09:32 AM

More revelations from the eeevil right wing Blogosphere....

The Democrat Mole In The CIA Fired....



[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by UpTight]

smithers_jones

smithers_jones

I'm lost
November 2003

APR 22, 2006 09:45 AM

There is a significant moral and ethical difference between a low level bureaucrat who the breaks law in order to expose government corruption and wrongdoing and a high level administration official who breaks the law to propagate and commit acts of corruption.

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 09:48 AM

Meanwhile, the "story" that Mccarthy & Dana Priest cooked up together, seems to be groundless, so maybe it is just plain, simple sedition rather than a leak of a genuine secret.

Either way, it is a clear indisputable example of the mainstream media working to further the agenda of the Democratic Party.

I wonder if Dana will be forced to hand back the Pulitzer she won for this lying, damaging, partisan piece of bullshit?

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 10:02 AM

smithers_jones said:
There is a significant moral and ethical difference between a low level bureaucrat who the breaks law in order to expose government corruption and wrongdoing and a high level administration official who breaks the law to propagate and commit acts of corruption.



Fine, except Mary O McCarthy could not possibly be described as "low level" by anyone...not even the L(iberal)A(genda) Times....

The officials said that McCarthy could face criminal prosecution, and that the Justice Department had been apprised of developments in the internal CIA probes. One U.S. official indicated that she had engaged in a "pattern of contacts" with more than one reporter.

McCarthy has held a series of high-level positions in the intelligence community during a career spanning two decades, according to a short biography posted on the website of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank where she was a visiting fellow in 2001 before returning to intelligence work.

According to the biography, McCarthy served as senior director for intelligence programs at the White House's National Security Council under President Clinton and, until July 2001, for President Bush.

Previously, she held positions with the National Intelligence Council, which formerly was based at the CIA and is responsible for producing assessments on major national security issues.






[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by UpTight]

ProfessorPlum

ProfessorPlum

Chicago, IL
October 2003

APR 22, 2006 10:03 AM

I find it incredibly disturbing that while we are at war and, by the way, have a republican controlled government, you are complaining about the media leaning to the left. Is this all you have to think about?

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 10:07 AM

ProfessorPlum said:
I find it incredibly disturbing that while we are at war and, by the way, have a republican controlled government, you are complaining about the media leaning to the left. Is this all you have to think about?



I find it incredible that during a time of war, one of America's most important media outlets is conspiring with political opponents of President, a person who held a senior post in the intelligence community, to cook up stories that denegrate America on the international stage.

You seem to be fine about this blatant, irresponsible act of sedition - but fuck - it's the same old syndrome. Anything - even in times of war - is acceptable to Libs, if it goes against bush.

ProfessorPlum

ProfessorPlum

Chicago, IL
October 2003

APR 22, 2006 10:30 AM

Well, I'm not a liberal, but I do support acts of sedition against this entire corporate controlled, warmongering, bible thumping plutocracy. That includes both parties. Republicans and democrats complaining about each other is such a waste of time.

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

APR 22, 2006 10:42 AM

The secret prison story ran way after the election. How are her donations to Kerry relevant?

_DictionaryGirl_

_DictionaryGirl_

NEWSWIRE

San Diego, CA

APR 22, 2006 10:46 AM

BillHaverchuck said:
The secret prison story ran way after the election. How are her donations to Kerry relevant?


Because thanks to her contributions, Kerry won the election, thus irreversibly altering the face of polit--

Oh. Wait. confused

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 12:09 PM

BillHaverchuck said:
The secret prison story ran way after the election. How are her donations to Kerry relevant?



The election may be irrelevent.

The donations prove her political allegiance.

And that is relevent - indeed central.

AceTracer

acetracer

Hollywood, FL
January 2004

APR 22, 2006 12:47 PM

Central to what? I don't really get your point.

I find it terribly amusing how Republicans control the White House, both houses of Congress, and the Supreme Court, and yet you're still trying to find a way to blame stuff on the evil liberals.

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 12:51 PM

AceTracer said:
Central to what? I don't really get your point.



oh - you fucking get the point of this was a proven republican contributor abusing his position by lending the "authority of the CIA" to back up a lie cooked up and spread in the right wing press, that denegrated America and attacked the policies of a Democrat president.

AceTracer

acetracer

Hollywood, FL
January 2004

APR 22, 2006 01:05 PM

Ok, I think I get it now.

To answer your question, yes they both broke the law and should both be tried equally with due diligence.

As to whether the media should give it as much attention. Well, one was the White House Chief of Staff, the most powerful unelected office you can hold in our government, the other was a "CIA desk jockey" as you so eloquently put it.

What do you think? (Oh and say hi to Mr. Uckots for me, nice to see he's still putting things into perspective).

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 01:17 PM

AceTracer said:
Oh and say hi to Mr. Uckots for me, nice to see he's still putting things into perspective.



shhhhh!

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 01:25 PM

AceTracer said:
Ok, I think I get it now.

To answer your question, yes they both broke the law and should both be tried equally with due diligence.

As to whether the media should give it as much attention. Well, one was the White House Chief of Staff, the most powerful unelected office you can hold in our government, the other was a "CIA desk jockey" as you so eloquently put it.

What do you think?



What do I think?

I think that if this was a Republican concoction the Lib media would be over it like a hot rash.

Post journalists have been the most pompously, self-righteous hacks I've ever met,

But despite this farce of story, they are STILL going to deny that they are a Democrat Party newspaper. They are still going to protest their impartiality and ethics.


puke

skeptik

skeptik

New Orleans, LA
February 2004

APR 22, 2006 01:48 PM

UpTight said:
Meanwhile, the "story" that Mccarthy & Dana Priest cooked up together, seems to be groundless, so maybe it is just plain, simple sedition rather than a leak of a genuine secret.


Or, more accurately, one person testified before the investigating committee that it was groundless.

On the other hand, from the same article:

De Vries came under sharp criticism from the EU parliamentarians for refusing to consider earlier testimonies from a German and a Canadian who described to the committee how they were kidnapped and imprisoned by foreign agents, and from a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan who alleged that British intelligence services used information obtained under torture.

''There is so much circumstantial evidence, you can't close your eyes from the fact that this is probably happening," Dutch deputy and civil liberties activist Kathalijne Buitenweg said

and

Former British ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray, who was fired after alleging Britain knowingly received intelligence extracted under torture, repeated his allegations to the committee yesterday. He said the British foreign service had confirmed to him that Britain had such a policy.



Oh heah, and

... The committee plans to go to Washington to interview former and current CIA officials and Bush administration officials.



Y'know, like McCarthy.
surreal

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

APR 22, 2006 02:56 PM

UpTight said:

BillHaverchuck said:
The secret prison story ran way after the election. How are her donations to Kerry relevant?



The election may be irrelevent.

The donations prove her political allegiance.

And that is relevent - indeed central.



Allied towards exposing secret prisons on foreign soil? That bitch.

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

APR 22, 2006 02:59 PM

UpTight said:

AceTracer said:
Ok, I think I get it now.

To answer your question, yes they both broke the law and should both be tried equally with due diligence.

As to whether the media should give it as much attention. Well, one was the White House Chief of Staff, the most powerful unelected office you can hold in our government, the other was a "CIA desk jockey" as you so eloquently put it.

What do you think?



What do I think?

I think that if this was a Republican concoction the Lib media would be over it like a hot rash.

Post journalists have been the most pompously, self-righteous hacks I've ever met,

But despite this farce of story, they are STILL going to deny that they are a Democrat Party newspaper. They are still going to protest their impartiality and ethics.


puke



I read the Washington Post everyday, have for the last 7+ years. They were
huge
supporters of the Iraq war. Their editorial page is very conservative. Again, what's your point.

[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by BillHaverchuck]

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

APR 22, 2006 03:27 PM

A Google search indicates that there are two Mary McCarthys in Bethesda
Mary Mccarthy, (301) 564-3178, 3 Pooks Hill Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 Google Maps Yahoo! Maps MapQuest
Mary Mccarthy, (301) 320-2248, 6825 Wilson Ln, Bethesda, MD 20817 Google Maps Yahoo! Maps MapQuest

Before we go off half cocked (oops! too late!) we should make sure which one is which.

Oh fuck, let's just hang both of them.

[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by NickFaust]

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 03:29 PM

BillHaverchuck said:

UpTight said:

BillHaverchuck said:
The secret prison story ran way after the election. How are her donations to Kerry relevant?



The election may be irrelevent.

The donations prove her political allegiance.

And that is relevent - indeed central.



Allied towards exposing secret prisons on foreign soil? That bitch.



yeah - we should just let Democrat CIA employees and the liberal media decide which national secrets are divulged to the world....and if the story is bullshit, well what the fuck...it's all gravy

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 22, 2006 03:30 PM

NickFaust said:
A Google search indicates that there are two Mary McCarthys in Bethesda
Mary Mccarthy, (301) 564-3178, 3 Pooks Hill Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 Google Maps Yahoo! Maps MapQuest
Mary Mccarthy, (301) 320-2248, 6825 Wilson Ln, Bethesda, MD 20817 Google Maps Yahoo! Maps MapQuest

Before we go off half cocked (oops! too late!) we should make sure which one is which.

Oh fuck, let's just hang both of them.

[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by NickFaust]



how many Mary O McCarthy's are there?

waldo

waldo

I'm lost
June 2004

APR 22, 2006 03:35 PM


The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the firing.



So your source is reliant on leakers?

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

APR 22, 2006 03:35 PM

UpTight said:
Having hung, drawn and quartered Scooter Libby leaking stuff to the press, I wonder if the Liberal - sorry "Main Stream" media will be quite so vigourous in the pursuit of truth and justice when it comes to Mary McCarthy.



It just tickles the shit out of me that you don't get the difference between the chief advisor to the Vice President (and one of chief architects of the Iraq initiative) outing a CIA asset as revenge for her husband telling the truth and a low level analyst providing evidence to the press of a US violation of international law and in contradiction to its own public policy statements.

But, in any case, if both are guilty of a crime both will be convicted and punished. The difference between them is that Mary McCarthy won't get a presidential pardon right before Bush leaves office.

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

APR 22, 2006 03:36 PM

UpTight said:

NickFaust said:
A Google search indicates that there are two Mary McCarthys in Bethesda
Mary Mccarthy, (301) 564-3178, 3 Pooks Hill Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 Google Maps Yahoo! Maps MapQuest
Mary Mccarthy, (301) 320-2248, 6825 Wilson Ln, Bethesda, MD 20817 Google Maps Yahoo! Maps MapQuest

Before we go off half cocked (oops! too late!) we should make sure which one is which.

Oh fuck, let's just hang both of them.

[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by NickFaust]



how many Mary O McCarthy's are there?



The middle initial is not listed on Google. And you don't know which is which, do you?

And by the way, your post - that is, the news bit - doesn't mention the initial, only the contribution list - how do you know that the CIA analyst is Mary O Macarthy?


[Edited on Apr 22, 2006 by NickFaust]

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next