Current Events

TOPICS:

9/1/05

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

218 | 219 | 220

 ... 484

Next

MissTyrios

misstyrios

NEWSWIRE

Allston, MA

SEP 01, 2005 12:30 AM

The Boston Herald - known for its tabloid approach to Massachusetts news - has printed video captures of an apparent re-enactment of the prison slaying of convicted pedophile and former priest John Geoghan. Joseph Druce, who was Geoghan's fellow inmate at the Massachusetts maximum security prison, is accused of slaying the 68-year-old who was serving a 10-year sentence for molesting a 10-year-old boy. Druce has claimed both that he did not kill Geoghan, and that - if he did - he "did it for the kids." But the video, which was an unauthorized, pirated copy purportedly made by a prison employee, shows Druce apparently re-enacting the killing with "glee." Keep in mind that the Herald is prone to exaggeration and hyperbole, but their description is grotesquely fascinating.

The clip starts with Druce standing in a cell naked but for white boxer shorts, his sinewy body scrawled with crude jailhouse tattoos. His pock-marked face is covered with a scraggly brown beard as he talks to himself in a mirror.

There is no audio, so it unclear exactly what Druce is saying as he wraps a white T-shirt around his broad shoulders and then pulls a red DOC scrub shirt over his head. He then takes stretched-out gym socks and ties them around his waist.

He mimes walking into Geoghan's cell. He talks to an invisible victim, then acts out how he jams the cell door at Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center with a carefully-cut paperback book. He spins around and throws a punch.

He falls to his knees, pulls his hands behind his back and wraps them with the white T-shirt. He then yanks an invisible victim to his feet and kicks him face-down to the floor.

Druce's face spreads into a cold grin as he reenacts how he allegedly choked Geoghan with the socks, pulling off the defrocked priest's own sneaker to use as a lever for the tourniquet.

As he demonstrates the slow twisting of the noose, Druce's face twists in pain and he begins to shake, illustrating how Geoghan's body went into convulsions.

But the violence does not stop there.

Druce starts to laugh to himself as he squats on the edge of the cell's steel cot. He points to his own neck, then leaps off the bed.

The motion is so brutal, the video shakes with the impact of each jump. One. Two. Three.

When the third stomping is complete, Druce turns to an imaginary audience and giggles. He shrugs his shoulders, smiles broadly and begins a victory jig, dancing around his cell with his thumbs raised in the air.

The video simulation mirrors what prosecutors have described in the slaying. An autopsy showed Geoghan's cause of death to be ligature strangulation and blunt chest trauma; broken ribs and a punctured lung.

The only detail missing in the video is the pillowcase Worcester County District Attorney John Conte said Druce used to "enhance the strangulation" and the razor he was carrying in hopes of castrating him.


The Department of Corrections claims that they do not have a copy of the tape and are launching an investigation to find out who obtained and released it.

DOC Commissioner Kathleen Dennehy said investigators have reviewed all video preserved since Geoghan was murdered on Aug. 23, 2003, at the Souza-Baranowski prison in Shirley. None of their videos match the images published in the Herald.

"Investigators have concluded that an unauthorized, pirated recording of live video footage of inmate Druce was made" when he was being held, Dennehy said in a statement.

Dennehy said it was "unconscionable" that an employee made the tape and didn't share it with homicide investigators.

Correction department spokesman Sgt. Paul Henderson said Wednesday that officials believe an employee downloaded the footage of Druce to one of the prison computers linked to Souza-Baranowski's 360 live surveillance cameras. It had to be an employee because inmates don't have access to the surveillance system, he said.

Henderson said the DOC is trying to determine if any of the images remain on one of the computers' hard drives.

If the employee who made the tape is identified, they will be subject to disciplinary action ranging from suspension to termination, Henderson said.

FridgeMagnet

FridgeMagnet

Chicago, IL
November 2004

SEP 01, 2005 10:05 AM

I will never understand how a person gan take any pleasure in killing anyone. I don't care how bad the person is. It's just beyond my ability to comprehend.

grahf

grahf

New York, NY
September 2002

SEP 01, 2005 10:31 AM

MissTyrios said:
Druce has claimed both that he did not kill Geoghan, and that - if he did - he "did it for the kids."


Hilarious.

Chriztian

Chriztian

Tallahassee, FL
September 2004

SEP 01, 2005 10:52 AM

Even if it is a bit fucked up that he got pleasure from it, I'd rather see that childfucker dead than eating off of, going to the doctor off of, and just generally using up our money. Some crimes do NOT get the punishments they deserve.

robosagogo

robosagogo

State College, PA
September 2004

SEP 01, 2005 10:59 AM

Chriztian said:
Even if it is a bit fucked up that he got pleasure from it, I'd rather see that childfucker dead than eating off of, going to the doctor off of, and just generally using up our money. Some crimes do NOT get the punishments they deserve.



Just because he was living off you doesn't mean he was enjoying it. Hell, now that's he's dead there's the slightest possibility he's gone to heaven. That's hardly a step down. And if he's just dead as in dead, I doubt he's at all bothered by the fact.

I'd rather he have gotten to watch the remaining years of his natural life evaporate ever so slowly before his very eyes. Maybe he wouldn't have died in prison, but even if he did live long enough to be released he'd have being a social pariah to look forward too. Still pretty bad.

[Edited on Sep 01, 2005 by robosagogo]

a548456

a548456

United Kingdom
OLD SKOOL

SEP 01, 2005 11:26 AM

Look at it this way...
It spared the extra costs that a death sentence trial would have incurred, and it's spared the tax payers the costs of keeping the nonce alive. He got what he deserved.

XxChocoTacoxX

XxChocoTacoxX

Champaign, IL
April 2005

SEP 01, 2005 11:27 AM

robosagogo said:
I'd rather he have gotten to watch the remaining years of his natural life evaporate ever so slowly before his very eyes.



Yeah. A lot of people think that living in prison is all great like you'll be watching TV in AC all day and eating ice cream or something. No, you get nothing like that. You watch as your life passes you by while you sit around doing nothing. You get no freedoms. It sucks. If you die, you don't have to live through that anymore. You're, in a way, released from your sentence. But whatever though.

MissTyrios

misstyrios

NEWSWIRE

Allston, MA

SEP 01, 2005 11:52 AM

Spike said:
Look at it this way...
It spared the extra costs that a death sentence trial would have incurred, and it's spared the tax payers the costs of keeping the nonce alive. He got what he deserved.



There is no death penalty in Massachusetts.

And even if there was, it would not be imposed upon a single molestation charge, which is what he was convicted of.

[Edited on Sep 01, 2005 by MissTyrios]

Doghouse_Reilly

doghouse_reilly

I'm lost
February 2004

SEP 01, 2005 12:11 PM

Yeee haw, how I love online armchair bloodlust. skull