Current Events

TOPICS:

11/2/04

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

308 | 309 | 310

 ... 484

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

missbernie

missbernie

HOPEFUL

Ypsilanti, MI

NOV 01, 2004 01:18 PM

i am i the only one who still hasn't decided who to vote for?

googused

googused

Portland, OR
OLD SKOOL

NOV 01, 2004 01:31 PM

No, it seems like they put something in the water in Ohio biggrin

P.S. Please vote for Kerry!

BadYeti

BadYeti

Sacramento, CA
September 2004

NOV 01, 2004 01:37 PM

Yes, you are. Hasn't Ohio been bombarded with like a million people on each side trying to inform you of the differences between the candidates?

What's making it hard for you to decide? The candidates have major differences. Anything in particular you're trying to decide between?

P.S. Please vote for Kerry!

[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by BadYeti]

Lain

Lain

Astoria, NY
April 2004

NOV 01, 2004 01:38 PM

I played it safe for the sake of my concience and future and wont vote at all.



[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by Lain]

dawnrazor

dawnrazor

United Kingdom
November 2003

NOV 01, 2004 01:54 PM

Maybe my favourite quote of the past week may help a little?


"if one candidate is trying to scare you, and the other's trying to get you to think; if one is appealing to your fears, and the other is appealing to your hopes -- it seems to me you ought to vote for the person who wants you to think and hope."



(one of Bill Clinton's rules of politics).

At the end of the day, go with your gut feeling. Your vote is a precious thing. Don't opt out of your democracy wink

beedlebaum

beedlebaum

Brooklyn, NY
March 2003

NOV 01, 2004 01:57 PM

The sleeper must awaken...

missbernie

missbernie

HOPEFUL

Ypsilanti, MI

NOV 01, 2004 02:48 PM

i believe in stem cell research, but not 3rd term abortions. i like equal rights but i don't want people to get things for free. immigration is okay but only if we can feed them too, we don't put enough work into our own country's education and we are falling behind. i agree with free trade we should be able to get the best products at the lowest prices, but i don't want it to come at the cost of child labor and harming others. our own economy is a concern, but then so is our culture. we receive mixed messages from our media and government. you want to own a gun? go ahead. we've got 'em. just in case the zombies come. if you shoot a person, you should be punished. terrorism should not be tolerated in any form. if i have to sacrifice a bit of my privacy, so be it. no one should get a tax break. we all use the government's money in one way or another. however, the government needs a bit of a refresher on budgeting. i believe children should be children but not spoiled. there's too much empahsis on school funding and not enough on learning. there are too many schools that are subpar and in disrepair. this is not a fair playing field. but, we elect those officials into office.

so, i'm still confused. help.

Thistle

Thistle

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

NOV 01, 2004 02:56 PM

Well the candidates are not opposites on all of those issues. You should pick the issues that are the MOST important to you and figure out what the candidates actually seem to be saying about them. For example, education seems to be pretty important to you as you mentioned it a lot in the paragraph above. How do you feel education should be handled? Which candidate seems to want to handle it that way?

Don't assume that either candidate is 100% toeing the party line on every issue. They both differ from the typical liberal/ conservative response to certain things. I don't want to tell you who feels what way about what thing because I have a strong pro-Kerry bias and I don't want to influence you myself.

If you are not willing to look into the candidates enough to find out where they actually stand on the issues that are important to you, then I recommend that you vote only on what you have already decided on (such as local ballot initiatives, congress people if they are up, etc) rather than make an uninformed choice.

[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by Thistle]

KaraLynn

KaraLynn

Beverly Hills, CA
April 2004

NOV 01, 2004 02:59 PM

I didn't vote for Bush the first time around and I'll be damned if I would this time either.

Edited to add that I knew about Bush and his antics in TX and he has some serious black marks on my list of important issues namely religious expression and the right to choose.


[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by KaraLynn]

Holy_Mountain

Holy_Mountain

West Palm Beach, FL
February 2004

NOV 01, 2004 03:01 PM

You should vote for Kerry then.

legionnaire

legionnaire

Belgium
November 2003

NOV 01, 2004 03:05 PM

missbernie said:
i believe in stem cell research, but not 3rd term abortions. i like equal rights but i don't want people to get things for free. immigration is okay but only if we can feed them too, we don't put enough work into our own country's education and we are falling behind. i agree with free trade we should be able to get the best products at the lowest prices, but i don't want it to come at the cost of child labor and harming others. our own economy is a concern, but then so is our culture. we receive mixed messages from our media and government. you want to own a gun? go ahead. we've got 'em. just in case the zombies come. if you shoot a person, you should be punished. terrorism should not be tolerated in any form. if i have to sacrifice a bit of my privacy, so be it. no one should get a tax break. we all use the government's money in one way or another. however, the government needs a bit of a refresher on budgeting. i believe children should be children but not spoiled. there's too much empahsis on school funding and not enough on learning. there are too many schools that are subpar and in disrepair. this is not a fair playing field. but, we elect those officials into office.

so, i'm still confused. help.



I'm sure everyone will discredit my opinion because I've been an open supporter of Kerry for a long time. But what you're posting there is much closer to Kerry's platform than Bush's platform.

Economically you say that you don't believe anyone should get a break from taxes but that you think the government should spend responsibly - this is the Democratic line. Bill Clinton balanced the federal budget and even created a surplus - George W. Bush has given us our biggest deficit in history and disproportionately cut taxes for the wealthy, including the elimination of the estate tax (which only affects the very wealthy.)

Kerry is for unfettered access to stem cell research, Bush implemented a policy restricting the ability of researchers to gain access to embryonic stem cell lines. Neither candidate is in favor of third term abortions, (which are exceedingly rare to begin with), although I believe that Kerry supports them in the case of serious health risks for the mother.

Both candidates (at least claim to) support continued immigration - but you need to keep in mind that Bush has made it much more difficult for people from other countries to work here by exponentially increasing the amount of red tape necessary to obtain a work visa.

As for education - Bush claimed this was a priority in his 2000 campaign, wrote the "No Child Left Behind Act" and then subsequently cut funding for it and other education initiatives in his budgets. The methodological basis for NCLB is questionable as well - there's no indication that using standardized testing a means to give out funds will result in better schools.

Neither candidate has advocated serious gun control laws. Bush was against the assault weapons ban, Kerry was for it. That law basically restricted access to guns that were classified as "assault weapons" meaning that had to have at least two of several listed characteristics including a grenade launcher, bayonet mount, threaded barrel for silencer and several other modifications not typically used for "sportsmen" purposes. People here will contest its effectiveness, I'm not an expert so I can't say.

To the chagrin of much of the progressive left, Kerry has not said much about using free trade to increase human rights abroad. Whether he will is up in the air, he will certainly continue to pursue a policy of free trade like Clinton did, but making trade contingent on a lack of child labor has not been brought up. You can bet that Bush won't do it either.

Both candidates will likely adopt a similar stance on global terrorism, meaning they will try hard to stop it. The advantage that Kerry has is his multilateral approach to international politics, other countries are aware that he will support them so will probably be more likely to give support when he asks for it. The US cannot take out terrorist organizations on its own. Bush has done a lot to soil the name of the US in the international community, from deriding our traditional European allies as "old Europe" to his disdain for the UN. None of this will help him when he comes calling on those same countries to help out in the real war on terror (as opposed to the imaginary one in Iraq.) Kerry will probably spend more time considering your civil liberties than Bush will in pursuing this goal, but you've said that isn't 'an issue for you.

A lot of other things you said are basically outside the effective realm of politics and are more cultural in nature, so whether bush or kerry is in office, there will likely still be spoiled children and unnecessarily precocious ones. But I hope I've helped make the case for why you should vote for Kerry and not for Bush.

Dead_Ringer

Dead_Ringer

I'm lost
September 2004

NOV 01, 2004 03:08 PM

it's been said before, and maybe it's beating a dead horse at this point:

think of the fact that 2 to 4 supreme court justices could be appointed in the next four years. these nine individuals hold the key to what you and i understand as "liberty." president bush and senator kerry have very divergent ideas about what our liberties should entail. it's not just abortion. there are key due process, equal protection, interstate commerce, and 1st amendment issues (just to name a few) that are 5-4 decisions and a swing the other way could change the face of the country you have known for some time now. these issues will effect YOU substantially.

missbernie

missbernie

HOPEFUL

Ypsilanti, MI

NOV 01, 2004 03:10 PM

Thistle said:
Well the candidates are not opposites on all of those issues. You should pick the issues that are the MOST important to you and figure out what the candidates actually seem to be saying about them. For example, education seems to be pretty important to you as you mentioned it a lot in the paragraph above. How do you feel education should be handled? Which candidate seems to want to handle it that way?

Don't assume that either candidate is 100% toeing the party line on every issue. They both differ from the typical liberal/ conservative response to certain things. I don't want to tell you who feels what way about what thing because I have a strong pro-Kerry bias and I don't want to influence you myself.

If you are not willing to look into the candidates enough to find out where they actually stand on the issues that are important to you, then I recommend that you vote only on what you have already decided on (such as local ballot initiatives, congress people if they are up, etc) rather than make an uninformed choice.

[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by Thistle]



oh i agree. there will be many uninformed voters out there tomorrow. i'm reading up on each of their issues and trying to find unbiased information on each candidate. blah. i guess i'm just disappointed in both of 'em. i'm disappointed in the polarization of Americans. i guess i'm just using this thread to vent my frustrations. frown

Thistle

Thistle

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

NOV 01, 2004 03:12 PM

missbernie said:

Thistle said:
Well the candidates are not opposites on all of those issues. You should pick the issues that are the MOST important to you and figure out what the candidates actually seem to be saying about them. For example, education seems to be pretty important to you as you mentioned it a lot in the paragraph above. How do you feel education should be handled? Which candidate seems to want to handle it that way?

Don't assume that either candidate is 100% toeing the party line on every issue. They both differ from the typical liberal/ conservative response to certain things. I don't want to tell you who feels what way about what thing because I have a strong pro-Kerry bias and I don't want to influence you myself.

If you are not willing to look into the candidates enough to find out where they actually stand on the issues that are important to you, then I recommend that you vote only on what you have already decided on (such as local ballot initiatives, congress people if they are up, etc) rather than make an uninformed choice.

[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by Thistle]



oh i agree. there will be many uninformed voters out there tomorrow. i'm reading up on each of their issues and trying to find unbiased information on each candidate. blah. i guess i'm just disappointed in both of 'em. i'm disappointed in the polarization of Americans. i guess i'm just using this thread to vent my frustrations. frown



Your frustration is quite understandable. Partisan politics is ruining the American political discourse.

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

NOV 01, 2004 03:14 PM

Okay, I've edited out the stuff I think is a wash for both candidates.

IMHO, things that mean you might want to vote Kerry:

missbernie said:
i believe in stem cell research, but not 3rd term abortions. no one should get a tax break. we all use the government's money in one way or another. however, the government needs a bit of a refresher on budgeting.



Third term abortions are currently illegal in the US except when the life of the mother is at risk. Kerry voted against a ban on "partial birth abortion" because there were no exceptions made for rape, incest or the health of the mother.

Both Kerry and Bush have promised tax cuts, although Bush has promised a lot more of them. Kerry has said he's going to raise taxes for people making over $200,000 a year.

Bush has already shown how fiscally irresponsible he is. Even if you think Kerry will try to increase federal spending more than Bush, he'll be facing a GOP-controlled Congress that won't give him the same blank check they've been giving Bush.

IMHO, things that mean you might want to vote Bush:

missbernie said:
you want to own a gun? go ahead. we've got 'em. just in case the zombies come.



Both Bush and Kerry say they wanted the Assault Weapons Ban to be extended, but Bush put no pressure on Congress to do so.

Call me partisan, but that's 3 to 1 in favor of Kerry.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

NOV 01, 2004 03:22 PM

legionnaire said:

missbernie said:
i believe in stem cell research, but not 3rd term abortions. i like equal rights but i don't want people to get things for free. immigration is okay but only if we can feed them too, we don't put enough work into our own country's education and we are falling behind. i agree with free trade we should be able to get the best products at the lowest prices, but i don't want it to come at the cost of child labor and harming others. our own economy is a concern, but then so is our culture. we receive mixed messages from our media and government. you want to own a gun? go ahead. we've got 'em. just in case the zombies come. if you shoot a person, you should be punished. terrorism should not be tolerated in any form. if i have to sacrifice a bit of my privacy, so be it. no one should get a tax break. we all use the government's money in one way or another. however, the government needs a bit of a refresher on budgeting. i believe children should be children but not spoiled. there's too much empahsis on school funding and not enough on learning. there are too many schools that are subpar and in disrepair. this is not a fair playing field. but, we elect those officials into office.

so, i'm still confused. help.



I'm sure everyone will discredit my opinion because I've been an open supporter of Kerry for a long time. But what you're posting there is much closer to Kerry's platform than Bush's platform.

Economically you say that you don't believe anyone should get a break from taxes but that you think the government should spend responsibly - this is the Democratic line. Bill Clinton balanced the federal budget and even created a surplus - George W. Bush has given us our biggest deficit in history and disproportionately cut taxes for the wealthy, including the elimination of the estate tax (which only affects the very wealthy.)

I'll also add that Kerry has been a consistent supporter of the "Pay-as-you-go" rules that governed Congress that led to the balanced budget under Clinton, and has suggested that that sort of responsible spending (ie. Don't legislate programs you can't pay for) will be a cornerstone of his administration's policy.

Kerry is for unfettered access to stem cell research, Bush implemented a policy restricting the ability of researchers to gain access to embryonic stem cell lines. Neither candidate is in favor of third term abortions, (which are exceedingly rare to begin with), although I believe that Kerry supports them in the case of serious health risks for the mother.

Both candidates (at least claim to) support continued immigration - but you need to keep in mind that Bush has made it much more difficult for people from other countries to work here by exponentially increasing the amount of red tape necessary to obtain a work visa.

As for education - Bush claimed this was a priority in his 2000 campaign, wrote the "No Child Left Behind Act" and then subsequently cut funding for it and other education initiatives in his budgets. The methodological basis for NCLB is questionable as well - there's no indication that using standardized testing a means to give out funds will result in better schools.

Neither candidate has advocated serious gun control laws. Bush was against the assault weapons ban, Kerry was for it. That law basically restricted access to guns that were classified as "assault weapons" meaning that had to have at least two of several listed characteristics including a grenade launcher, bayonet mount, threaded barrel for silencer and several other modifications not typically used for "sportsmen" purposes. People here will contest its effectiveness, I'm not an expert so I can't say.


I'd really rather not get into this again, so I'll clarify a couple things. Bush said he'd pass the assault weapons ban if it came across his desk, but he never pushed Congress to pass it. It's essentially the same as being against the bill, just sneakier.

To the chagrin of much of the progressive left, Kerry has not said much about using free trade to increase human rights abroad. Whether he will is up in the air, he will certainly continue to pursue a policy of free trade like Clinton did, but making trade contingent on a lack of child labor has not been brought up. You can bet that Bush won't do it either.

Both candidates will likely adopt a similar stance on global terrorism, meaning they will try hard to stop it. The advantage that Kerry has is his multilateral approach to international politics, other countries are aware that he will support them so will probably be more likely to give support when he asks for it. The US cannot take out terrorist organizations on its own. Bush has done a lot to soil the name of the US in the international community, from deriding our traditional European allies as "old Europe" to his disdain for the UN. None of this will help him when he comes calling on those same countries to help out in the real war on terror (as opposed to the imaginary one in Iraq.) Kerry will probably spend more time considering your civil liberties than Bush will in pursuing this goal, but you've said that isn't 'an issue for you.

A lot of other things you said are basically outside the effective realm of politics and are more cultural in nature, so whether bush or kerry is in office, there will likely still be spoiled children and unnecessarily precocious ones. But I hope I've helped make the case for why you should vote for Kerry and not for Bush.



I'll also add that you should really take a serious interest in your Congressional elections. They're the ones that make laws, and while the President can push them a certain amount in one way or another, when it boils down to it, the President can't actually pass anything on his own. The issues you've raised require local, state, and federal effort to solve, and nothing short of voting in all of those elections with a careful eye on each candidate's stance on those issues important to you is going to have much effect.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

NOV 01, 2004 03:29 PM

missbernie said:

Thistle said:
Well the candidates are not opposites on all of those issues. You should pick the issues that are the MOST important to you and figure out what the candidates actually seem to be saying about them. For example, education seems to be pretty important to you as you mentioned it a lot in the paragraph above. How do you feel education should be handled? Which candidate seems to want to handle it that way?

Don't assume that either candidate is 100% toeing the party line on every issue. They both differ from the typical liberal/ conservative response to certain things. I don't want to tell you who feels what way about what thing because I have a strong pro-Kerry bias and I don't want to influence you myself.

If you are not willing to look into the candidates enough to find out where they actually stand on the issues that are important to you, then I recommend that you vote only on what you have already decided on (such as local ballot initiatives, congress people if they are up, etc) rather than make an uninformed choice.

[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by Thistle]



oh i agree. there will be many uninformed voters out there tomorrow. i'm reading up on each of their issues and trying to find unbiased information on each candidate. blah. i guess i'm just disappointed in both of 'em. i'm disappointed in the polarization of Americans. i guess i'm just using this thread to vent my frustrations. frown



Fair enough. I hope we can answer any questions you might have or clarify anything you're still unclear on.

Also, you may want to listen to the candidates in their own words talking about certain issues. Then again, you may have already heard them as much as you care to. In any case, NPR has provided a page that contains links to audio of both Bush and Kerry talking about certain issues, including abortion, immigration, Iraq, health care, the Patriot Act, energy policy, college costs, gay marriage, the environment, No Child Left Behind, and jobs.

Here's the link to the page.

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

NOV 01, 2004 03:32 PM

Lain said:
I played it safe for the sake of my concience and future and wont vote at all.



[Edited on Nov 01, 2004 by Lain]



No way. Seriously?

missbernie

missbernie

HOPEFUL

Ypsilanti, MI

NOV 01, 2004 03:32 PM

i agree bean. my choice of presidential candidate won't matter much considering the electoral college is the real deal. but i feel left out that i'm not for one group or another. this feels more like a "who's team is gonna win" than an election.

grrr...vote missbernie, the others suck. wink

TheSeadog

TheSeadog

Reunion
September 2004

NOV 01, 2004 03:33 PM

Thistle said:
Your frustration is quite understandable. Partisan politics is ruining the American political discourse.



Right on.

TheSeadog

TheSeadog

Reunion
September 2004

NOV 01, 2004 03:33 PM

missbernie said:
i agree bean. my choice of presidential candidate won't matter much considering the electoral college is the real deal. but i feel left out that i'm not for one group or another. this feels more like a "who's team is gonna win" than an election.

grrr...vote missbernie, the others suck. wink


You've got my vote.

missbernie

missbernie

HOPEFUL

Ypsilanti, MI

NOV 01, 2004 03:40 PM

DocLoki said:

missbernie said:
i agree bean. my choice of presidential candidate won't matter much considering the electoral college is the real deal. but i feel left out that i'm not for one group or another. this feels more like a "who's team is gonna win" than an election.

grrr...vote missbernie, the others suck. wink


You've got my vote.



yay! only a few million more and i'm in!

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

NOV 01, 2004 03:42 PM

missbernie said:
i believe in stem cell research, but not 3rd term abortions. i like equal rights but i don't want people to get things for free. immigration is okay but only if we can feed them too, we don't put enough work into our own country's education and we are falling behind. i agree with free trade we should be able to get the best products at the lowest prices, but i don't want it to come at the cost of child labor and harming others. our own economy is a concern, but then so is our culture. we receive mixed messages from our media and government. you want to own a gun? go ahead. we've got 'em. just in case the zombies come. if you shoot a person, you should be punished. terrorism should not be tolerated in any form. if i have to sacrifice a bit of my privacy, so be it. no one should get a tax break. we all use the government's money in one way or another. however, the government needs a bit of a refresher on budgeting. i believe children should be children but not spoiled. there's too much empahsis on school funding and not enough on learning. there are too many schools that are subpar and in disrepair. this is not a fair playing field. but, we elect those officials into office.

so, i'm still confused. help.



sounds like you're a DLC-era "new democrat", just like kerry and clinton.

http://www.ndol.org/

start with the new democrat credo, you might find some things you like.

http://www.ndol.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=86&subid=194&contentid=3775

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

NOV 01, 2004 03:44 PM

missbernie said:
grrr...vote missbernie, the others suck. wink



as robert anton wilson says, vote for yourself, no one else can represent you as well as you can.

(i'm still voting kerry. between me and kerry, he's probably the lesser of two evils.)

JohnClement

JohnClement

Silver Spring, MD
January 2004

NOV 01, 2004 03:56 PM

I'd feel bad if I felt like I influenced your vote, so I won't tell you how to vote. So my suggestion is: 1.take the paragraph you wrote above 2. go to each candidate's website 3. Compare your list with their platforms 4. See which agrees with your positions the most.
Hope this helps.

P.S. After reading the other thread, i now understand Lain's post.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next