Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

336 | 337 | 338

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

SEP 05, 2004 11:00 AM

contrast said:

America sucks at football




i think we need a death match with team of nfl players against a team of soccer and rugby players and show once and for all who the better athletes are.



Will the NFL boys be able to wear their 50 pounds of protective padding and helmets?


Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

SEP 05, 2004 11:26 AM

Wow...I can't believe people are actually discussing this.

It's completely subjective.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

SEP 05, 2004 12:41 PM

You know, I already been oppressed four times today! Fuckin' America! whatever

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

SEP 05, 2004 12:43 PM

MEROVINGIAN said:

UpTight said:

contrast said:

America sucks at football




i think we need a death match with team of nfl players against a team of soccer and rugby players and show once and for all who the better athletes are.



Will the NFL boys be able to wear their 50 pounds of protective padding and helmets?




HAHA! I have very little time near my computer for the next couple of days, but I had to respond to this...I've had this same discussion with several friends.

Few NFL players could deal with the physicality and endurance required for RUGBY. Some NFL players ARE very strong, but Rugby players train just as hard at being strong. Where Rugby players EXCEL is in all out endurance and toughness....hands down....no questions here. Ray Lewis may out bench the average Rugby Pack player(look it up), but he would never be able to compete with Rugby players without conserveing a great deal of that strength and portioning it out over 80...read carefully....80 count'em 80...CONTINUOUS MINUTES of play. Anybody who hasn't been to a rugby tournament can't have an educated opinion on what rugby players are about and what they go through.
I have only seen 1 or two other profiles on SG that list rugby anywhere, so hopefully they see this and jump in too, but I played rugby at the university level here in the U.S. and have some first hand knowledge, so I'll just give a quick description.

15 players face 15 players(not 11 so there isn't near as much getting away as hitting) face each othe on the field.
Game starts with a kickoff, and is followed by 40 minutes of play. 5minute half time. Second half starts with a kickoff followed by 40 minutes of play. Time that was wasted on the field is then added to play like in soccer.

This is actual play. If there is a penalty the ref takes the ball and quickly gets play started again. If there is an injury on the field the hurt player and his team have ONE minute to get up and play or get off the field, then play resumes. No NFL style, lets play hard for 5, 10, 15 seconds, take a break to talk about our next super play for a minute. Then let's have a nice long half time and come out and have another 30 minute half.

At the university level ther is another aspect that American football players have a hard time with, and this cost us more recruits from football than any other aspect of the game....TOURNAMENTS. Rugby tournaments are just that. Multiple teams show up from all across the area and determine who the champion is in one day or one weekend. These are thrown into the regular season schedule. So every once in a while(1-3 times a season for my team, more for bigger universities) you would be expected to duplicate your game play up to 3 times in 1 day. Even if a former football player played other halfs or games with us, we were usually a person or two short the first practice following a tournament never to hear from them again. America's own professional rugby team is still grossly outmatched in games against teams like the South Africa Springboks, New Zealand All Blacks(they don't even have a mascott, just the color of their uniforms wink ) , and to give the UK SG's some props the England RFU(2003 World Cup Champions)

So, in my humble opinion, if you take the plastic padding and helmets off the NFL players and put the top 15 on a rugby field(bigger) against the top 15 World Cup level rugby players...OR...put the top 11 NFL players against 11 Rugby World Cup players on an NFL field and through a ball out there and play 'smear th queer"....I would be surprised to even see half of those NFL players leave the field standing....while the Rugby players would just go get a Pint of Guinnesswink after words.

Yours Truly,
HOOKER 2

Morgan said:
Wow...I can't believe people are actually discussing this.

It's completely subjective.



Nuh uh...


[Edited on Sep 05, 2004 by MEROVINGIAN]



I'm sure that I would have an opinion on this matter and be terribly offended if it weren't for the fact that sports are for teh gays.

Pauillac

Pauillac

Canada
April 2003

SEP 05, 2004 12:46 PM

Morgan said:
Wow...I can't believe people are actually discussing this.

It's completely subjective.



Exactly. A fact lost on the people who responded by demanding to know which country was " greater".

It's a fine line between patriotism and jingoism.

SludgeHead

SludgeHead

United Kingdom
February 2004

SEP 05, 2004 12:59 PM

MEROVINGIAN said:

UpTight said:

contrast said:

America sucks at football




i think we need a death match with team of nfl players against a team of soccer and rugby players and show once and for all who the better athletes are.



Will the NFL boys be able to wear their 50 pounds of protective padding and helmets?




HAHA! I have very little time near my computer for the next couple of days, but I had to respond to this...I've had this same discussion with several friends.

Few NFL players could deal with the physicality and endurance required for RUGBY. Some NFL players ARE very strong, but Rugby players train just as hard at being strong. Where Rugby players EXCEL is in all out endurance and toughness....hands down....no questions here. Ray Lewis may out bench the average Rugby Pack player(look it up), but he would never be able to compete with Rugby players without conserveing a great deal of that strength and portioning it out over 80...read carefully....80 count'em 80...CONTINUOUS MINUTES of play. Anybody who hasn't been to a rugby tournament can't have an educated opinion on what rugby players are about and what they go through.
I have only seen 1 or two other profiles on SG that list rugby anywhere, so hopefully they see this and jump in too, but I played rugby at the university level here in the U.S. and have some first hand knowledge, so I'll just give a quick description.

15 players face 15 players(not 11 so there isn't near as much getting away as hitting) face each othe on the field.
Game starts with a kickoff, and is followed by 40 minutes of play. 5minute half time. Second half starts with a kickoff followed by 40 minutes of play. Time that was wasted on the field is then added to play like in soccer.

This is actual play. If there is a penalty the ref takes the ball and quickly gets play started again. If there is an injury on the field the hurt player and his team have ONE minute to get up and play or get off the field, then play resumes. No NFL style, lets play hard for 5, 10, 15 seconds, take a break to talk about our next super play for a minute. Then let's have a nice long half time and come out and have another 30 minute half.

At the university level ther is another aspect that American football players have a hard time with, and this cost us more recruits from football than any other aspect of the game....TOURNAMENTS. Rugby tournaments are just that. Multiple teams show up from all across the area and determine who the champion is in one day or one weekend. These are thrown into the regular season schedule. So every once in a while(1-3 times a season for my team, more for bigger universities) you would be expected to duplicate your game play up to 3 times in 1 day. Even if a former football player played other halfs or games with us, we were usually a person or two short the first practice following a tournament never to hear from them again. America's own professional rugby team is still grossly outmatched in games against teams like the South Africa Springboks, New Zealand All Blacks(they don't even have a mascott, just the color of their uniforms wink ) , and to give the UK SG's some props the England RFU(2003 World Cup Champions)

So, in my humble opinion, if you take the plastic padding and helmets off the NFL players and put the top 15 on a rugby field(bigger) against the top 15 World Cup level rugby players...OR...put the top 11 NFL players against 11 Rugby World Cup players on an NFL field and through a ball out there and play 'smear th queer"....I would be surprised to even see half of those NFL players leave the field standing....while the Rugby players would just go get a Pint of Guinnesswink after words.

Yours Truly,
HOOKER 2


[Edited on Sep 05, 2004 by MEROVINGIAN]



Having played both American Football and Rugby i've found American Football a tougher sport, the impact just always seemed more aggressive. In rugby you rarely get people who can run fast and make big hits.

Clunk

Clunk

I'm lost
August 2004

SEP 05, 2004 02:29 PM

Hmmm... What kinda rugby? Union is for pussies. League is the harder/faster/rougher game.

BobbySoAwesome

BobbySoAwesome

Canada
March 2004

SEP 05, 2004 02:42 PM

Lemmee just end this for everyone. The greatest nation....... Urination, especially if you hold it in for a long time. That's FAN-Tastic. Who wants to argue that...huh..what....Yeah, I thought so.

[Edited on Sep 05, 2004 by BobbySoAwesome]

contrast

contrast

Minneapolis, MN
January 2004

SEP 05, 2004 02:45 PM

haha, maybe if rugby players were wieghed down with 40 pounds of pads, they'd appreciate an nfl player's endurance.

and if rugby players were world class athletes running straight at each other at full speed, they'd need them.

wink

contrast

contrast

Minneapolis, MN
January 2004

SEP 05, 2004 02:51 PM

in terms of conditioning, i concede that athletes who play sports that contain constant motion, such as soccer and basketball, are more impressive than nfl players.

but in terms of the more basic measures of athleticism, there is no greater combination of speed, strength, power, agility, and overall toughness than an nfl player. wink



(edited to add toughness. mwuahahahaha!)

[Edited on Sep 05, 2004 by contrast]

Aaron

Aaron

Shakopee, MN
July 2004

SEP 05, 2004 02:56 PM

MEROVINGIAN said:

Pauillac said:

Morgan said:
Wow...I can't believe people are actually discussing this.

It's completely subjective.



Exactly. A fact lost on the people who responded by demanding to know which country was " greater".

It's a fine line between patriotism and jingoism.




Haha...oh know people are talking about.....sports....let's flame THEM shocked


This thread didn't start out about sports...so I'm sure they were talking about the original topic ie. Bush saying America is the greatest nation in the world ad nausem....

TheInsomniac

TheInsomniac

Washington, DC
October 2003

SEP 05, 2004 07:04 PM

RedBstrd said:
"1. Strength of economy and freedom of trade." -ProdigalSaint

Why freedom of trade? Why not freedom of labor?




Good question, but my answer depends on what you mean by "freedom of labor." I think you mean the ability to freely choose who one labors FOR, yes?

When I say "freedom of trade", I mean it in the purest sense, and the one that would be best for workers. The ability to choose what one does with one's own goods, money, AND labor. The foundation of fair trade. One's labor, one's ability to work, is something to be traded for equitable goods or services, right? So, the ability to freely choose who one labors for is part of freedom of trade. Trade isn't the only practiced by corporations or governments (groups of people), but of individuals as well.

[Edited on Sep 05, 2004 by ProdigalSaint]

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Riverside, CA
April 2004

SEP 06, 2004 01:39 AM

ProdigalSaint said:

RedBstrd said:
"1. Strength of economy and freedom of trade." -ProdigalSaint

Why freedom of trade? Why not freedom of labor?




Good question, but my answer depends on what you mean by "freedom of labor." I think you mean the ability to freely choose who one labors FOR, yes?

When I say "freedom of trade", I mean it in the purest sense, and the one that would be best for workers. The ability to choose what one does with one's own goods, money, AND labor. The foundation of fair trade. One's labor, one's ability to work, is something to be traded for equitable goods or services, right? So, the ability to freely choose who one labors for is part of freedom of trade. Trade isn't the only practiced by corporations or governments (groups of people), but of individuals as well.

[Edited on Sep 05, 2004 by ProdigalSaint]



By my rhetorical question, I was primarily pointing out a tendency for people in capitalist countries to associate freedom with the freedom of the economically privileged rather than with the common laborer. Thus, my question was an attempt to force a justification of the criteria with which we are proposing to evaluate nations.

To answer your question; yes, labor is a commodity. However, I don't think it is just a commodity. A simple guarantee of "free trade" would allow labor to be exchanged, but "freedom of labor" seems to be much more expansive than that (in the same way that "freedom of trade" means more than just the existence of a market for goods). To make the list *brief*, I would suggest a few examples of what "freedom of labor" might look like:
- Freedom of labor to strike even when the government deems the nation to be "in emergency."
- Freedom from government role in creating unions, appointing union members, or formulating categories of people barred from unions (foremen, or Communists, for instance).
- Freedom to seek work, be employed in labor (with legally protected agreements on pay), and to quit employment.
- Abolition of forced labor and child labor.

Obviously, I consider freedom of labor to be akin to freedom of speech - in both, the freedom is protected, as are the prerequisites for the expression/exercise of that freedom. For instance, freedom of speech means that people can say what they want without fear of consequences (unless what they say is criminal in nature). People can also write, distribute, etc. their ideas. I believe freedom of labor is similar, in that it is a protection of the right to work as well as the protection of things necessary for that work: unions, safe work conditions, etc.

Thus, by freedom of labor I would generally mean the same criteria on which the UN rates this category:
Right to Association and Collective Bargaining
Right to Organize and Collective Bargaining
Abolition of Forced Labor
Abolition of Forced Labor (cont.)
Equal Work, Equal Pay
Equal Work, Equal Pay
Elimination of Child Labor
Elimination of Child Labor (cont.)
Economic and Social Rights

To bring the discussion back on topic a little, the UN human development reports don't rate the US so well in this department...

dem_z

dem_z

United Kingdom
June 2004

SEP 06, 2004 09:47 AM

Saying "America is the greatest nation on Earth" is one thing. Saying "America is the greatest nation on earth, and we're going to use our power to fuck up your country, and steal your natural resources, and while we're at it FUCK THE PLANET" is quite another. confused whatever

TheInsomniac

TheInsomniac

Washington, DC
October 2003

SEP 06, 2004 01:56 PM

demetrius_z said:
Saying "America is the greatest nation on Earth" is one thing. Saying "America is the greatest nation on earth, and we're going to use our power to fuck up your country, and steal your natural resources, and while we're at it FUCK THE PLANET" is quite another. confused whatever



Who is saying that, exactly?

Aaron

Aaron

Shakopee, MN
July 2004

SEP 06, 2004 01:59 PM

ProdigalSaint said:

demetrius_z said:
Saying "America is the greatest nation on Earth" is one thing. Saying "America is the greatest nation on earth, and we're going to use our power to fuck up your country, and steal your natural resources, and while we're at it FUCK THE PLANET" is quite another. confused whatever



Who is saying that, exactly?



Bush...

obijonk

obijonk

United Kingdom
May 2003

SEP 06, 2004 03:33 PM

contrast said:

America sucks at football




i think we need a death match with team of nfl players against a team of soccer and rugby players and show once and for all who the better athletes are.

nah, scratch that. just have ray lewis vs. 12 of the worlds best soccer and rugby players. it'd be a waste of time for the other nfl players to show up. tongue



NFL vs rugby. are you crazy? without their pads, the NFL players would be annihilated.

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

SEP 06, 2004 03:50 PM

crayonscars said:

contrast said:

America sucks at football




i think we need a death match with team of nfl players against a team of soccer and rugby players and show once and for all who the better athletes are.

nah, scratch that. just have ray lewis vs. 12 of the worlds best soccer and rugby players. it'd be a waste of time for the other nfl players to show up. tongue



NFL vs rugby. are you crazy? without their pads, the NFL players would be annihilated.



No one has said what game we're having these players play. My guess is that the rugby players would win rugby, and the American football players win at Americna football, crazy as that may sound.

As far as I'm concerned, the whole lot of them are pantywaist milquetoasts compared to ballet dancers.

RabidShrew

RabidShrew

United Kingdom
January 2004

SEP 06, 2004 04:06 PM

starkmadd said:

germ13 said:

SmellinOfTroy said:

Yeah, yeah yeah. And the sun'll never set on the British empire.


Can anyone tell me why this is a misquote? SmellinOfTroy don't talk out of your arse whatever

[Edited on Sep 03, 2004 by germ13]



Misquote because since Hong Kong is no longer a part of the British Empire, the sun does in fact set on the Empire every day.



Nope, we still have over 1,000 territories and Crown dependancies. The sun still does not set on the Brtish Empire. We continue to be the largest Empire.

Pariset said:

Those colors come closer to running the world than any other, but that isn't why I believe America is the greatest nation on earth.



Actually the EU has more influence in the world than the US...

I believe that America is the greatest nation because we [Americans] enjoy an overall level of freedom that is unmatched throughout the world. America isn't perfect, but what country is? There is no place I'd rather be.



...and a better standard of living.

Closest country to perfect would be Norway according to all available measures.



Oh, and rugby by miles. How many NFL players have missing teeth, broken noses and cauliflower ears?

[Edited on Sep 06, 2004 by RabidShrew]

stockula

stockula

Anchorage, AK
May 2003

SEP 06, 2004 06:14 PM

Morgan said:
Wow...I can't believe people are actually discussing this.

It's completely subjective.



I'm going to go out on a limb and assert that America is objectively the best country, EVER.

contrast

contrast

Minneapolis, MN
January 2004

SEP 06, 2004 06:18 PM

crayonscars said:

contrast said:

America sucks at football




i think we need a death match with team of nfl players against a team of soccer and rugby players and show once and for all who the better athletes are.

nah, scratch that. just have ray lewis vs. 12 of the worlds best soccer and rugby players. it'd be a waste of time for the other nfl players to show up. tongue



NFL vs rugby. are you crazy? without their pads, the NFL players would be annihilated.




a, LOL

b, no, i'm talking back alley hand to hand combat no holds barred fight to the death.

Pauillac

Pauillac

Canada
April 2003

SEP 06, 2004 06:40 PM

stockula said:

Morgan said:
Wow...I can't believe people are actually discussing this.

It's completely subjective.



I'm going to go out on a limb and assert that America is objectively the best country, EVER.



How would you know? Don't you live in Northern Canada? tongue

stockula

stockula

Anchorage, AK
May 2003

SEP 06, 2004 06:43 PM

I thought they used to call it New Russia

RACER_X

RACER_X

Philadelphia, PA
February 2003

SEP 06, 2004 07:47 PM

crayonscars said:

contrast said:

America sucks at football




i think we need a death match with team of nfl players against a team of soccer and rugby players and show once and for all who the better athletes are.

nah, scratch that. just have ray lewis vs. 12 of the worlds best soccer and rugby players. it'd be a waste of time for the other nfl players to show up. tongue



NFL vs rugby. are you crazy? without their pads, the NFL players would be annihilated.




And a rugby player never sees the kind of open field tackling, at the speed and ferocity of an NFL game.

whatever

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next