Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

345 | 346 | 347

 ... 487

Next

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

AUG 06, 2004 11:39 AM

According to The Washington Times:

An estimated 25 million automobiles in the United States now have event data recorders, a scaled-down version of the devices that monitor cockpit activity in airplanes. Like aviation recorders, automobile black boxes mainly receive attention after an accident.

The devices' primary function is to monitor various sensors and decide whether to fire air bags. Since the 1998 model year, all new cars from all manufacturers have been required to have air bags and so most such recent-model cars have the devices. But secondary and more recently installed features in many recorders store data from a few seconds before a crash.


Privacy advocates worry that the information collected by these devices may be misused, but some highway safety and public health advocates believe the data will go a long way toward keeping people alive.

From sfgate.com:

[Dr. Ricardo] Martinez, an emergency room physician [and former head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration], said he wants black boxes mandated for all vehicles and says gathering proper data from crashes... is as important a public health issue as medical research.

"You can't attack any problem until you understand the cause," said Martinez, who now heads an Atlanta firm involved in an effort with the Georgia Institute of Technology to develop a data recorder and accident reporting device called the MacBox.


I'm just not sure why this is the first I've heard about the black box in my car. Did you know?

Love

Love

SUICIDEGIRL

I'm lost

AUG 06, 2004 12:13 PM

Some rental car companies have similar devices in cars that can tell if you've been offroading, speeding, going across state lines, or otherwise breaking the rental agreement. Crazy isn't it?

[Edited on Aug 06, 2004 by Love]

mQx

mqx

Seattle, WA
January 2003

AUG 06, 2004 12:31 PM

It's also said that some car companies may be able to use the information (such as speeding or extreme braking) to void your warrenty or service plans. Welcome to the future!

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

AUG 06, 2004 03:09 PM

Hm, I heard about this many months ago.

"Privacy" vs. "security"... an age old question.

If it's a rental car then, hell, it's not your car. You don't like it, don't rent it.

If it's MY car... well... maybe it'll be useful to me and make car upkeep easier. Maybe I go 90 mph to important meeting and I get a ticket in the mail a week later. The jury's still out on that one, for me.

mr_sunshine

mr_sunshine

Abbotsford, BC
June 2004

AUG 06, 2004 03:13 PM

These boxes could prove invaluable to insurance adjusters. imagine in you were the only person in a car hit by a group of speeding teenagers. The box in both cars could provide a much more accurate description of the accident.
This device scares me much less than, say, OnStar. OnStar is both a GPS and cell phone in one, but you can't actually control when the phone turns off. I've heard stories of customers listening to the conversations of operators after their calls were officially over, so why not the other direction? A built-in tracking device and wiretap seems just rife for abuse from law enforcement.

[Edited on Aug 06, 2004 3:13PM]

NatasKaput

NatasKaput

Bozeman, MT
December 2002

AUG 06, 2004 03:33 PM

Love said:
Some rental car companies have similar devices in cars that can tell if you've been offroading, speeding, going across state lines, or otherwise breaking the rental agreement. Crazy isn't it?

[Edited on Aug 06, 2004 by Love]


most of those are piggyback chips on CPUs both rental cars i've used i pulled em right off

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

AUG 06, 2004 04:48 PM

Yeah, those goddamned corrupt rental car companies, spying on... their... own... property. Ahem. Nevermind.

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

AUG 06, 2004 06:52 PM

It's not just rental car companies, the boxes are in most newer cars, probably including the one you drive if your car was manufactured after 1998. Now do you see why I was so surprised?

wolfwood

wolfwood

Madison, WI
March 2003

AUG 06, 2004 06:59 PM

I think it's okay for rental cars, but I wouldn't want it in my car. I think it'll be misused, although I can see how it could help do good. I'm just so damn sick of all this invasion of privacy crap. It's like nothing ever gets any better.

GravesForTheDays

GravesForTheDays

Grand Rapids, MI
November 2003

AUG 06, 2004 07:01 PM

Spyware for your car, hmmmm. whatever

tretiak

tretiak

San Francisco, CA
March 2003

AUG 06, 2004 07:07 PM

Currently the box information is inadmissable in civil trials in California. That came down a few months ago and I think as the appeal wends it's way through we'll see a lot more about who owns that information and who is entitled to view it.

The case in question was someone trying to get the report from the car computer as to what speed the car was traveling when it hit someone. I'm pretty sure it was a civil liability trial between the two accident parties, not anything criminal.

So that's where the privacy thing here in CA stands right now, but the case law is being made as we speck.

loudog1

loudog1

Newport Beach, CA
December 2003

AUG 06, 2004 08:23 PM

The public safety arguement doesn't really work because most car accidents are caused by bad driving.

What are they going to say, "Our black box data has demonstrated that running red lights can cause an accident. So you all should try to not drive through red lights."

DUH!

clara

clara

MODERATOR

Baltimore, MD

AUG 06, 2004 09:02 PM

loudog1 said:
The public safety arguement doesn't really work because most car accidents are caused by bad driving.

What are they going to say, "Our black box data has demonstrated that running red lights can cause an accident. So you all should try to not drive through red lights."

DUH!


Some of the articles I've seen on this subject state that manufacturers have used the data to improve cars' safety features. I think you're right to think that the data doesn't help in every situation, but if a manufacturer has access to information about the contributing factors in a crash and considers that in relation to the victim's injuries it's possible to learn things like the most effective placement of an airbag and so forth.

Zero_the_Hero

Zero_the_Hero

Los Angeles, CA
May 2004

AUG 06, 2004 09:20 PM

I first heard of this a few months ago. A person was accused of vehicular manslaughter because of excessive speed/braking being recorded by the microchip that controls whether or not the airbag deploys...

P.s.: I am trying to find a source I can cite….

Edit to add:
Police use car's "black box" as evidence





[Edited on Aug 06, 2004 by Zero_the_Hero]

Zero_the_Hero

Zero_the_Hero

Los Angeles, CA
May 2004

AUG 06, 2004 09:39 PM


CA police are also testing a transmitter that knocks out engine (emissions) control computers, allowing them to "disable" most cars less than 10 years old from a distance…
For use in cases of high speed chases only, of course…

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

AUG 06, 2004 09:55 PM

Clara said:

loudog1 said:
The public safety arguement doesn't really work because most car accidents are caused by bad driving.

What are they going to say, "Our black box data has demonstrated that running red lights can cause an accident. So you all should try to not drive through red lights."

DUH!


Some of the articles I've seen on this subject state that manufacturers have used the data to improve cars' safety features. I think you're right to think that the data doesn't help in every situation, but if a manufacturer has access to information about the contributing factors in a crash and considers that in relation to the victim's injuries it's possible to learn things like the most effective placement of an airbag and so forth.



Exactly. I really think it probably helps more than most people would realize. Think about this scenario: Say I'm an automotive engineer working on ways to make cars preemptively react to threatening situations, like, say, sudden swerves that might cause a spin-out, or a tire that hits a patch of black ice or something. Now, I could spend months setting up carefully planned test runs and collecting all sorts of data from those, but if my goal is to look at what the biggest real-life hazardous driving factors are, I'm going to need real life data.

I mean, it would have been really cool if last fall, when I fell asleep at the wheel after a week that included 3 1-day drives to Vegas and a couple late nights in Hollywood, my car realized that I was drifting and that my foot had relaxed off the pedal and sounded some sort of alarm or otherwise reacted to the situation. Getting the data that defines that type of scenario would be impossible without these sorts of devices.

Besides that, I think that, for law enforcement purposes, this would be a case of the public good outweighing any potential loss of privacy. I mean, which 3 minutes of driving data do you not want them to see? "Oh no, they might find out that I'm a crappy driver!" whatever

I_M

I_M

Canada
January 2004

AUG 08, 2004 09:45 PM

Zero_the_Hero said:

CA police are also testing a transmitter that knocks out engine (emissions) control computers, allowing them to "disable" most cars less than 10 years old from a distance…
For use in cases of high speed chases only, of course…



They were talking about the same device here, and an officer (can't remember if he was OPP or RCMP) admitted, on the news, that it's probably not the best idea for police to have that level of control...