Researchers have been able to genetically create a strain of “mighty mice” that are twice as strong as normal mice, raising treatment hopes for a range of illnesses involving muscle degeneration.
Scientists were able to produce these super-strong mice by suppressing the NCoR1 receptor that normally inhibits the buildup of muscle tissue. In the absence of that inhibitor, their offspring could run faster and longer before showing any signs of fatigue and even showed better cold tolerance.
In all seriousness though, this does have some good applications for us:
“This could be used to combat muscle weakness in the elderly, which leads to falls and contributes to hospitalizations,” said team leader Johan Auwerx from École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL). “In addition, we think that this could be used as a basis for developing a treatment for genetic muscular dystrophy,” he said.
Researchers have been able to genetically create a strain of “mighty mice” that are twice as strong as normal mice, raising treatment hopes for CREATING CAPTAIN AMERICA.
Researchers have been able to genetically create a strain of “mighty mice” that are twice as strong as normal mice, raising treatment hopes for CREATING CAPTAIN AMERICA.
FIFY
and my first thought was, "doesn't this sound like the beginning of an x-men origin story?"
Researchers have been able to genetically create a strain of “mighty mice” that are twice as strong as normal mice, raising treatment hopes for creating .
I'm no expert, but I am a skeptic and I'm thinking that an increase in muscle growth would put a greater stain on bones and joints. It seems to me that maybe the NCoR1 receptor in the genetic code is there for the very purpose of balancing muscle build up with skeletal wear and tear. It'd be a little like dropping a V8 into a Fiat Panda. It might go fast for a while, but the drive train and frame just aren't designed to handle that much extra torque. Catastrophic failure is inevitable.
Bill_the_Cat said:
I'm no expert, but I am a skeptic and I'm thinking that an increase in muscle growth would put a greater stain on bones and joints. It seems to me that maybe the NCoR1 receptor in the genetic code is there for the very purpose of balancing muscle build up with skeletal wear and tear. It'd be a little like dropping a V8 into a Fiat Panda. It might go fast for a while, but the drive train and frame just aren't designed to handle that much extra torque. Catastrophic failure is inevitable.
The following is my understanding:
Correct, but human muscle growth inhibitors evolved based on an extremely physically active lifestyle. We don't have that lifestyle anymore. Thus, deactivating some of those inhibitors is most appropriate for people who really need the extra muscle growth. That's why they're talking about using it to counteract muscular dystrophy, but not as a recommended treatment for body builders.
Though body builders could maybe get the same results with much, much less work. That'd be sweet, too.
Bill_the_Cat said:
I'm no expert, but I am a skeptic and I'm thinking that an increase in muscle growth would put a greater stain on bones and joints. It seems to me that maybe the NCoR1 receptor in the genetic code is there for the very purpose of balancing muscle build up with skeletal wear and tear. It'd be a little like dropping a V8 into a Fiat Panda. It might go fast for a while, but the drive train and frame just aren't designed to handle that much extra torque. Catastrophic failure is inevitable.
You mean that these mice might be born with... BONEITIS!!!!
Bill_the_Cat said:
I'm no expert, but I am a skeptic and I'm thinking that an increase in muscle growth would put a greater stain on bones and joints. It seems to me that maybe the NCoR1 receptor in the genetic code is there for the very purpose of balancing muscle build up with skeletal wear and tear. It'd be a little like dropping a V8 into a Fiat Panda. It might go fast for a while, but the drive train and frame just aren't designed to handle that much extra torque. Catastrophic failure is inevitable.
You mean that these mice might be born with... BONEITIS!!!!
Bill_the_Cat said:
I'm no expert, but I am a skeptic and I'm thinking that an increase in muscle growth would put a greater stain on bones and joints. It seems to me that maybe the NCoR1 receptor in the genetic code is there for the very purpose of balancing muscle build up with skeletal wear and tear. It'd be a little like dropping a V8 into a Fiat Panda. It might go fast for a while, but the drive train and frame just aren't designed to handle that much extra torque. Catastrophic failure is inevitable.
You mean that these mice might be born with... BONEITIS!!!!
Bill_the_Cat said:
I'm no expert, but I am a skeptic and I'm thinking that an increase in muscle growth would put a greater stain on bones and joints....
That is likely. Tweak any balanced system and you're going to throw things off. So we need to learn more tweaks, so we can tune and counter tune. Transhumanism, full steam ahead.
I don't know, it seems like if someone's muscles are unnaturally weak due to disease, but there is nothing wrong with their bones or ligaments, then this therapy would redtore them to balance rather than making their muscles too strong for their bones.
Thistle said:
I don't know, it seems like if someone's muscles are unnaturally weak due to disease, but there is nothing wrong with their bones or ligaments, then this therapy would redtore them to balance rather than making their muscles too strong for their bones.
That may be true, but the article also talks about using it as therapy for elderly patients, who are not known for their strong bones and connective tissue.
Thistle said:
I don't know, it seems like if someone's muscles are unnaturally weak due to disease, but there is nothing wrong with their bones or ligaments, then this therapy would redtore them to balance rather than making their muscles too strong for their bones.
That may be true, but the article also talks about using it as therapy for elderly patients, who are not known for their strong bones and connective tissue.
True. I am excited to see where this research goes though.
Thistle said:
I don't know, it seems like if someone's muscles are unnaturally weak due to disease, but there is nothing wrong with their bones or ligaments, then this therapy would redtore them to balance rather than making their muscles too strong for their bones.
That may be true, but the article also talks about using it as therapy for elderly patients, who are not known for their strong bones and connective tissue.
True. I am excited to see where this research goes though.
Thistle said:
I don't know, it seems like if someone's muscles are unnaturally weak due to disease, but there is nothing wrong with their bones or ligaments, then this therapy would redtore them to balance rather than making their muscles too strong for their bones.
That may be true, but the article also talks about using it as therapy for elderly patients, who are not known for their strong bones and connective tissue.
True. I am excited to see where this research goes though.
Canadian_Coat
Brockville, ON
September 2008
NOV 11, 2011 01:30 AM