Were down to the second to last Asshole Fuckface Roundup of all time. Ive been called up to the big leagues. Asshole Fuckfaces will no longer be my business. This makes today the 7th worst day in world history. Tomorrow will be the 6th and you can probably see a pattern developing. So, hold on to your assholes, because this is going to be ugly.
Meet Ohio State Representative John Adams. He believes womens bodies belong to men, like property. Women should obviously have no say in what they want in their pathetic lives.
An Ohio lawmaker has introduced a bill that would prevent a woman from having an abortion unless she gets written consent from the biological father.
Cant see any problem with that. Its just a well thought out policy.
"What does the father have to say in the abortion of his child? He has nothing to say (under current law)," Adams told 10TV News.
Thats because its not growing in his torso and coming out of his vagina.
In the case where the father isn't known, House Bill 252 would compel the woman to provide a list of names of people who may be the father in an effort to determine paternity. The bill also would make it a crime for women to lie about who the father is, and make it illegal for doctors to perform abortions without the father's consent.
A worthy use of government. Also, if the father is located, the woman will be branded with his name on her forehead. Oh, and I loved the book, The Handmaid's Tale. Thanks for the reminder.
The bill would force a woman to have a child if the father does not agree to an abortion.
Or to move out of Ohio. Dear John Adams, you are sub-human.
Next up, more racist Republican Asshole Fuckfacery.
As I wrote the day Obama was elected, racist Republican nonsense will continue to spew forth every day Obama is in office. Republicans, or, as they are often called, rich, white people, believe their racist jokes are something everyone does. They believe its just our common language and they will continue sending offensive jokes and twitters until he leaves office. Its who they are. They don't know any better.
First, well start with Atwater, California City Council member Gary Frago. Garys big on sending out hilarious emails about President Obama and his wife.
Breaking News Playboy just offered Sarah Palin $1 million to pose nude in the January issue. Michelle Obama got the same offer from National Geographic.
Shes black, by the way. I mean, if you missed the hilarity, National Geographic is known for publishing photos of bare-chested African women, or, at least they did in the 50s.
Some emails compared Obama to O.J. Simpson while others suggested that nigger rigs should now be called presidential solutions.
Obviously, Gary has a big future in politics, but hes not the worst racist emailer of the week. No, that honor goes to Dr. David McKalip. Dr. David is the founder of the right-wing, anti-health reform group Doctors For Patient Freedom. Hes one of the doctors the GOP is taking out for talks to explain to Americans why health care reform is bad.
"Congress wants to create larger, government-funded programs for health care and more bureaucracy that ration care and impose cookbook medicine."
Good stuff. He also sent out this image of Obama as a witch doctor this week.
McKalip said he believes that by depicting the president as an African witch doctor, the artist who created the image "was expressing concerns that the health-care proposals [made by President Obama] would make the quality of medical care worse in our country." McKalip said he didn't know who created it.
Hell yeah. Its impossible to make that point without putting a bone in the presidents nose. Impossible.
The Republicans have whipped up their talking points to stop health care reform. Here's the highlight:
Democrats are proposing a government controlled health insurance system, which will control care, treatments, medicines and even what doctors a patient may see.
So, health insurance that will control care, treatments, medicines and even what doctors a patient may see? Um, thats exactly what we have now. So, good point? Oh, and there's more.
President Obama's health care experiment is too much, too fast, too soon. Our country cannot afford to fix health care through a rushed experiment.
Its a good thing we havent had, like, 60 years to think about it. In actuality, it needs to be a rush job. Why? Because 5 million Americans have lost their insurance since September. Because 16% of Americans over the age of 18 have no health insurance. Thats actually something you should deal with fast, not slow. Oh, and 70% of Americans want a public plan.
The only reason Republicans want to slow it down is because they want more time to come up with lies to spread across the airwaves to defeat health care reform. And they have no plan. No plan.
With all that is going on in our country, it amazing we continue our war on drugs, specifically marijuana. Currently, law enforcement officials are conducting Operation SOS or, Save Our Sierra. They are saving it from pot.
More than 314,000 plants were uprooted in 70 gardens numbers expected to rise as the enforcement action continues, the paper reported. Agents also seized $41,000 in cash, 26 firearms and three vehicles.
Sweet. Obamas drug policy is the same old, stupid, moronic drug policy we have been living under for years, with the same old idiots in charge. Take Obamas new idiot drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, who had some awesome things to say about pot.
"Legalization is not in the president's vocabulary, and it's not in mine," he said.
"Marijuana is dangerous and has no medicinal benefit," Kerlikowske said.
No, cant think of a thing.
Keep on keepin on. Its a tremendous success and a great use of our money. By the way, government, if pot was legal pot farmers wouldn't be screwing up the environment up in the mountains. Just a tip.
FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday and Friday for more from FearTheReaper You may also enjoy his blog, Stop All Monsters.
The problem with how you're angling the pot story is you're missing the point of the raids. They are removing illegally planted pot on government land. They aren't chasing the people actually growing for "medicinal use", they are dealing with criminal activity. I'm pretty sure you also can't farm tomatoes in a national park. I'd love to see pot legalized - even "sin taxed" like alcohol if that is what it takes, but then you can have people legally farming it.
The problem with how you're angling the pot story is you're missing the point of the raids. They are removing illegally planted pot on government land. They aren't chasing the people actually growing for "medicinal use", they are dealing with criminal activity. I'm pretty sure you also can't farm tomatoes in a national park. I'd love to see pot legalized - even "sin taxed" like alcohol if that is what it takes, but then you can have people legally farming it.
]
Good point. Oh, and I wrote this
Keep on keepin’ on. It’s a tremendous success and a great use of our money. By the way, government, if pot was legal pot farmers wouldn't be screwing up the environment up in the mountains. Just a tip.
The problem with how you're angling the pot story is you're missing the point of the raids. They are removing illegally planted pot on government land. They aren't chasing the people actually growing for "medicinal use", they are dealing with criminal activity. I'm pretty sure you also can't farm tomatoes in a national park. I'd love to see pot legalized - even "sin taxed" like alcohol if that is what it takes, but then you can have people legally farming it.
]
Good point. Oh, and I wrote this
Keep on keepin’ on. It’s a tremendous success and a great use of our money. By the way, government, if pot was legal pot farmers wouldn't be screwing up the environment up in the mountains. Just a tip.
in the original story. Thanks for reading.
Yeah, I saw your point, but you missed my point about growing ANYTHING on government land being illegal. Granted, the feds could care fuck ton less about some guy growing acres of say corn or tomatoes in a national park, and wouldn't spend hundreds of millions on it, but it doesn't make it any less legal. Of course, the dumbass growing veggies probably isn't booby trapping his crops or having people with guns camped out to protect his precious green.
The worst part about the legalization issue is big tobacco is probably going to try and get their filthy hands in it and find ways to make it toxic. But that is my own little conspiracy theory.
mydogfarted said:
Yeah, I saw your point, but you missed my point about growing ANYTHING on government land being illegal.
That's exactly why I made the comment I did.
ok, so this is a "TOE-MAY-TOE" "TOE-MAH-TOE" argument then. I guess midnightblue69 may actually be right about us having our heads up each other's asses.
I work with guys who are vehemently against health care reform. When I remind them that they're currently receiving medical benefits from a socialized medical system, they find a way to cram in as many talking points as possible in what can only be described as a frothing howl. The best part is when I tell them to discontinue or opt out of their coverage if they don't think the system works. Nobody does.
MrCrisp said:
I work with guys who are vehemently against health care reform. When I remind them that they're currently receiving medical benefits from a socialized medical system, they find a way to cram in as many talking points as possible in what can only be described as a frothing howl. The best part is when I tell them to discontinue or opt out of their coverage if they don't think the system works. Nobody does.
Maybe you should stop making healthcare points while they are talking about drugs.
MrCrisp said:
I work with guys who are vehemently against health care reform. When I remind them that they're currently receiving medical benefits from a socialized medical system, they find a way to cram in as many talking points as possible in what can only be described as a frothing howl. The best part is when I tell them to discontinue or opt out of their coverage if they don't think the system works. Nobody does.
Maybe you should stop making healthcare points while they are talking about drugs.
They're usually talking about how Nobama is ruining America, and that he's not our commander-in-chief because he's some illegal alien from Kenyan sent here to destabilize our country, rape our womens, and then force them to have abortions. I wonder what kind of drugs they're on.
I would be really stoked if my newly-pregnant girlfriend came to me and we had a talk about whether to have an abortion or not, as opposed to her making the decision entirely on her own. Yeah it's growing inside and coming out of her, but what comes out has half my shit inside it, too, and I'm just as responsible for raising it as she is.
Legislating that, however, is probably really difficult. The example above is absurd.
So if a woman is forced to have a child b/c the father doesn't agree with the abortion, then is that father going to be forced to raise that child on his own?
Jace said:
I would be really stoked if my newly-pregnant girlfriend came to me and we had a talk about whether to have an abortion or not, as opposed to her making the decision entirely on her own. Yeah it's growing inside and coming out of her, but what comes out has half my shit inside it, too, and I'm just as responsible for raising it as she is.
Legislating that, however, is probably really difficult. The example above is absurd.
It may be based on half your genetic material, but I highly doubt that any of the calcium was leached from your bones producing half of that baby. Coming up with part of the blue print doesn't mean you had half of the shit to do with building it.
CassyLee said:
So if a woman is forced to have a child b/c the father doesn't agree with the abortion, then is that father going to be forced to raise that child on his own?
Here's my deal about the abortion deal. In the reverse situation, ie, a man doesn't want the child and the woman does, the woman can the decision affecting the man's life. It only stands to reason, in the intrest of sexual equality, the biological father should have some descision about the abortion. Conversly, if we're not going to have this law, a man should be able to divorce himself of responsibility. I don't think it's fair for a woman to be unilaterly in control in this type of situation.
SergeantPsycho said:
Here's my deal about the abortion deal. In the reverse situation, ie, a man doesn't want the child and the woman does, the woman can the decision affecting the man's life. It only stands to reason, in the intrest of sexual equality, the biological father should have some descision about the abortion. Conversly, if we're not going to have this law, a man should be able to divorce himself of responsibility. I don't think it's fair for a woman to be unilaterly in control in this type of situation.
Isn't there something in most places where a person can sign away all their parental rights and responsibilities?
SergeantPsycho said:
Here's my deal about the abortion deal. In the reverse situation, ie, a man doesn't want the child and the woman does, the woman can the decision affecting the man's life. It only stands to reason, in the intrest of sexual equality, the biological father should have some descision about the abortion. Conversly, if we're not going to have this law, a man should be able to divorce himself of responsibility. I don't think it's fair for a woman to be unilaterly in control in this type of situation.
Isn't there something in most places where a person can sign away all their parental rights and responsibilities?
Well, there's giving up for adoption, but I'm fairly wouldn't apply in a situation where the father doesn't want parental responsibilities and the mother does.
SergeantPsycho said:
Here's my deal about the abortion deal. In the reverse situation, ie, a man doesn't want the child and the woman does, the woman can the decision affecting the man's life. It only stands to reason, in the intrest of sexual equality, the biological father should have some descision about the abortion. Conversly, if we're not going to have this law, a man should be able to divorce himself of responsibility. I don't think it's fair for a woman to be unilaterly in control in this type of situation.
Isn't there something in most places where a person can sign away all their parental rights and responsibilities?
Well, there's giving up for adoption, but I'm fairly wouldn't apply in a situation where the father doesn't want parental responsibilities and the mother does.
FearTheReaper
NEWSWIRE
I'm lost
JUL 24, 2009 09:42 AM