I'm sad for all the employees but anything with "mega" in it's name should close.
Super huge colossal stores are for shareholders and not for employees or customers.
Let independent stores take there place.
The online downloading reason is BS, several stores in Chicago are very much alive in selling cd's and even vinyl.
d_day said:
I can't say I'm sad to see 'em go. I never did care for the idea of paying $20 for a CD I could buy from Amazon for $12.
Cee... Dee?
Yes, I actually still prefer to purchase compact discs. For one thing, a catastrophic data loss will not affect my CDs. For another, it's something tangible, something I can pick up and hold. Let us not forget the liner notes well.
Cassiel said:
The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.
If it's anything like Tower's fire sale, all the good stuff will go first with only 10% off. By the time you get to the really good price cuts, you'll be left with the Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica boxed set and the Underworld trilogy.
d_day said:
I can't say I'm sad to see 'em go. I never did care for the idea of paying $20 for a CD I could buy from Amazon for $12.
Cee... Dee?
Yes, I actually still prefer to purchase compact discs. For one thing, a catastrophic data loss will not affect my CDs. For another, it's something tangible, something I can pick up and hold. Let us not forget the liner notes well.
Cassiel said:
The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.
If it's anything like Tower's fire sale, all the good stuff will go first with only 10% off. By the time you get to the really good price cuts, you'll be left with the Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica boxed set and the Underworld trilogy.
hey! Kate Beckinsdale almost naked is not to be missed.
Not surprising considering what happened with 'Zavvi' over here. For those in wholesale be sure to get in on the action if they are being administrated and the stock is being auctioned off - dirt cheap box sets and recent new release ahoy...
Cassiel said:
The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.
Doubtful. Liquidation sales suck.
yeah, when Zavvi stores (formerly Virgin Megastores over here) went the same way, the sale they had didn't really seem any better than buying elsewhere online.
The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.
According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.
It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.
The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.
According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.
It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.
The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.
According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.
It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.
So the company has been and remains profitable but the trust that holds the leases thinks it can do better with an even more profitable retail tenant?
Remember when they told us to stop all the downloading because it was going to kill brick-and-mortar retail stores?
What I don't understand is why Virgin is just rolling over, I understand that they probably have to, due to lease agreements, but why not just change their site plan and site criteria and relocate to different locations? Are they afraid to not be mega stores?
The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.
According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.
It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.
So the company has been and remains profitable but the trust that holds the leases thinks it can do better with an even more profitable retail tenant?
Remember when they told us to stop all the downloading because it was going to kill brick-and-mortar retail stores?
What I don't understand is why Virgin is just rolling over, I understand that they probably have to, due to lease agreements, but why not just change their site plan and site criteria and relocate to different locations? Are they afraid to not be mega stores?
I think you've missed the point - the parent company thinks they can make more money by shutting down the business and leasing out their buildings. In a way, it makes sense:
- No more staff to maintain: salaries, benefits, etc;
- No warehouses full of inventory to maintain;
You've now eliminated tremendous overhead, don't have to deal with a narrow margin, cuthroat business, and can charge rental rates that exceed the costs of financing the buildings. If it hasn't been made perfectly clear in the current economy, big corps care fuck all for the people at the bottom - it's all about the dollars at the end of them month.
The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.
According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.
It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.
So the company has been and remains profitable but the trust that holds the leases thinks it can do better with an even more profitable retail tenant?
Remember when they told us to stop all the downloading because it was going to kill brick-and-mortar retail stores?
What I don't understand is why Virgin is just rolling over, I understand that they probably have to, due to lease agreements, but why not just change their site plan and site criteria and relocate to different locations? Are they afraid to not be mega stores?
I think you've missed the point - the parent company thinks they can make more money by shutting down the business and leasing out their buildings. In a way, it makes sense:
- No more staff to maintain: salaries, benefits, etc;
- No warehouses full of inventory to maintain;
You've now eliminated tremendous overhead, don't have to deal with a narrow margin, cuthroat business, and can charge rental rates that exceed the costs of financing the buildings. If it hasn't been made perfectly clear in the current economy, big corps care fuck all for the people at the bottom - it's all about the dollars at the end of them month.
You're right I didn't think of it in terms of the company operating the stores and just really wanting to be property managers. It just seems like if they wanted to be property managers why by the stores at all? But you make a good point.
lil_tuffy said:
According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.
Because right now people are just clamoring to start new businesses in high rent retail space.
Cassiel
Aurora, CO
September 2004
MAR 04, 2009 09:45 PM