Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

MAR 04, 2009 09:45 PM

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

MAR 04, 2009 09:54 PM

I'm sad for all the employees but anything with "mega" in it's name should close.
Super huge colossal stores are for shareholders and not for employees or customers.
Let independent stores take there place.

The online downloading reason is BS, several stores in Chicago are very much alive in selling cd's and even vinyl.

d_day

d_day

San Bernardino, CA
July 2002

MAR 04, 2009 09:56 PM

I can't say I'm sad to see 'em go. I never did care for the idea of paying $20 for a CD I could buy from Amazon for $12.

Homme

Homme

Los Angeles, CA
January 2009

MAR 04, 2009 10:09 PM

d_day said:
I can't say I'm sad to see 'em go. I never did care for the idea of paying $20 for a CD I could buy from Amazon for $12.



Cee... Dee?

d_day

d_day

San Bernardino, CA
July 2002

MAR 04, 2009 10:11 PM

Homme said:

d_day said:
I can't say I'm sad to see 'em go. I never did care for the idea of paying $20 for a CD I could buy from Amazon for $12.



Cee... Dee?



Yes, I actually still prefer to purchase compact discs. For one thing, a catastrophic data loss will not affect my CDs. For another, it's something tangible, something I can pick up and hold. Let us not forget the liner notes well.

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

MAR 04, 2009 10:15 PM

Great. Now where will I get virgins for my ritual sacrifices?

Jena

Jena

New York, NY
June 2003

MAR 04, 2009 10:15 PM

Weren't they supposed to close years ago? I could swear this is the second time I'm hearing this.

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

MAR 04, 2009 10:34 PM

This is kinda crazy. I can no longer think of anywhere to buy a DVD in San Francisco. Virgin Megawhore was my fallback after Tower closed.

Not that I've watched a DVD in about a year.

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

MAR 04, 2009 10:36 PM

I just remembered, Best Buy still sells shiny plastic discs.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

MAR 04, 2009 10:37 PM

The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.

Jena

Jena

New York, NY
June 2003

MAR 04, 2009 10:41 PM

Jena said:
Weren't they supposed to close years ago? I could swear this is the second time I'm hearing this.



Ah shit, thanks s5. I was thinking of Tower. blush

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

MAR 04, 2009 10:55 PM

Cassiel said:
The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.



If it's anything like Tower's fire sale, all the good stuff will go first with only 10% off. By the time you get to the really good price cuts, you'll be left with the Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica boxed set and the Underworld trilogy.

goatboy23

goatboy23

Vatican City
November 2003

MAR 04, 2009 10:56 PM

s5 said:
This is kinda crazy. I can no longer think of anywhere to buy a DVD in San Francisco. Virgin Megawhore was my fallback after Tower closed.

Not that I've watched a DVD in about a year.



What about Amoeba? Are they still around? That place is friggin' amazing.

pillboxhat

pillboxhat

I'm lost
November 2004

MAR 04, 2009 11:14 PM

d_day said:

Homme said:

d_day said:
I can't say I'm sad to see 'em go. I never did care for the idea of paying $20 for a CD I could buy from Amazon for $12.



Cee... Dee?



Yes, I actually still prefer to purchase compact discs. For one thing, a catastrophic data loss will not affect my CDs. For another, it's something tangible, something I can pick up and hold. Let us not forget the liner notes well.


Hell-to-the-Yes. I still buy CDs, new and used.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

MAR 04, 2009 11:16 PM

s5 said:

Cassiel said:
The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.



If it's anything like Tower's fire sale, all the good stuff will go first with only 10% off. By the time you get to the really good price cuts, you'll be left with the Newlyweds: Nick and Jessica boxed set and the Underworld trilogy.


hey! Kate Beckinsdale almost naked is not to be missed.

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

MAR 04, 2009 11:51 PM

Cassiel said:
The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.


Doubtful. Liquidation sales suck.

AstralTraveller

AstralTraveller

United Kingdom
January 2003

MAR 05, 2009 12:30 AM

Not surprising considering what happened with 'Zavvi' over here. For those in wholesale be sure to get in on the action if they are being administrated and the stock is being auctioned off - dirt cheap box sets and recent new release ahoy...

wottan

wottan

Vancouver, BC
July 2004

MAR 05, 2009 01:20 AM

They lost their virginity?

Hunkpapa

Hunkpapa

United Kingdom
June 2004

MAR 05, 2009 04:36 AM

gdarklighter said:

Cassiel said:
The upside to this will be that they'll probably have a huge sale, if they aren't already.


Doubtful. Liquidation sales suck.



yeah, when Zavvi stores (formerly Virgin Megastores over here) went the same way, the sale they had didn't really seem any better than buying elsewhere online.

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

MAR 05, 2009 04:59 AM

The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.



According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.

It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.

Tiger_Fodder

Tiger_Fodder

Braintree, MA
June 2007

MAR 05, 2009 05:37 AM

lil_tuffy said:

The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.



According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.

It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.



So I've been downloading for no reason? confused

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

MAR 05, 2009 05:49 AM

lil_tuffy said:

The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.



According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.

It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.



So the company has been and remains profitable but the trust that holds the leases thinks it can do better with an even more profitable retail tenant?

Remember when they told us to stop all the downloading because it was going to kill brick-and-mortar retail stores?

What I don't understand is why Virgin is just rolling over, I understand that they probably have to, due to lease agreements, but why not just change their site plan and site criteria and relocate to different locations? Are they afraid to not be mega stores?

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

MAR 05, 2009 07:33 AM

ChrisSick said:

lil_tuffy said:

The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.



According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.

It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.



So the company has been and remains profitable but the trust that holds the leases thinks it can do better with an even more profitable retail tenant?

Remember when they told us to stop all the downloading because it was going to kill brick-and-mortar retail stores?

What I don't understand is why Virgin is just rolling over, I understand that they probably have to, due to lease agreements, but why not just change their site plan and site criteria and relocate to different locations? Are they afraid to not be mega stores?



I think you've missed the point - the parent company thinks they can make more money by shutting down the business and leasing out their buildings. In a way, it makes sense:
- No more staff to maintain: salaries, benefits, etc;
- No warehouses full of inventory to maintain;

You've now eliminated tremendous overhead, don't have to deal with a narrow margin, cuthroat business, and can charge rental rates that exceed the costs of financing the buildings. If it hasn't been made perfectly clear in the current economy, big corps care fuck all for the people at the bottom - it's all about the dollars at the end of them month.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

MAR 05, 2009 10:03 AM

mydogfarted said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

ChrisSick said:

lil_tuffy said:

The Associated Press reported that the stores in general remain profitable, but that the real-estate joint venture of Related Companies and Vornado Realty Trust, which bought Los Angeles-based Virgin Entertainment Group Inc. in 2007, determined that they could earn higher rents from new tenants in the spaces occupied by the stores.



According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.

It has nothing to do with lack of sales due to downloading.



So the company has been and remains profitable but the trust that holds the leases thinks it can do better with an even more profitable retail tenant?

Remember when they told us to stop all the downloading because it was going to kill brick-and-mortar retail stores?

What I don't understand is why Virgin is just rolling over, I understand that they probably have to, due to lease agreements, but why not just change their site plan and site criteria and relocate to different locations? Are they afraid to not be mega stores?




I think you've missed the point - the parent company thinks they can make more money by shutting down the business and leasing out their buildings. In a way, it makes sense:
- No more staff to maintain: salaries, benefits, etc;
- No warehouses full of inventory to maintain;

You've now eliminated tremendous overhead, don't have to deal with a narrow margin, cuthroat business, and can charge rental rates that exceed the costs of financing the buildings. If it hasn't been made perfectly clear in the current economy, big corps care fuck all for the people at the bottom - it's all about the dollars at the end of them month.



You're right I didn't think of it in terms of the company operating the stores and just really wanting to be property managers. It just seems like if they wanted to be property managers why by the stores at all? But you make a good point.

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

MAR 05, 2009 11:18 AM

lil_tuffy said:
According to the article, they aren't closing because of lack of sales but because the leaseholders thnk they can get more money by evicting them and replacing with new business.



Because right now people are just clamoring to start new businesses in high rent retail space.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next