DD's Unconventional Political Insight

If you gaze through history, when it comes to picking a president whichever man is the most sexualized always wins; whoever does the best with the ladies, wins; whoever is more a man, wins. This is why Joesph Lieberman, for example, will never win, besides him being Jewish (I have nothing against Jews, but the popular masses do; a Jew will never be elected president).

Recent examples:
George H. Bush vs. Michael Dukakais
Bill Clinton vs. George H. Bush vs. Ross Perot
Bill Clinton vs. Bob Dole
George W. Bush vs. Al Gore vs. Ralph Nader

(And, although not presidential)
Arnold (overwhelming sexuality) vs. Gray Davis (underwhelming sexuality)

Interesting that in the 1992 election with Ross Perot, the results can be directly corresponded to sexuality, with Ross Perot being the least sexualized getting the least votes. Same can be said of the 2000 election.

This principle is not limited to relatively recent politics but throughout all history; whoever is the most masculine, wins. This is also why I believe that no woman will ever be elected president; whether it "should" be like that is up for debate, though if it never happens what is the difference?

It is also worthy to note that civilizations rise during masculine societal values and declines during feminine societal values. If you look throughout all history, in the latter stages leading up to a fall, masculinity is always in decline. Right now there is no doubt we are in a feminine societal value stage, masculinity is in decline, and that our society is decaying. As author Camille Paglia likes to say, we are in a complex historical mode characterized by debauchery; (Hence the upsurge of piercings and tattoos).

I predict Howard Dean will win because he is the most masculine. He's cocky, he's the most arrogant, and that is exactly why he will win.

In short, politics has little of anything to do with one's politics.

IMO our 2 most successful presidents have been the sexiest. Interestingly enough, they both publicly cheated on their wives ...

I agree with your last statement. And I'd like to add that political parties have little to do with one's politics.

I doubt it! So there!