The under-one's-breath perspective among conservatives I work with on this is that it will only mean that "fags will be more prolific."
7
Varuka_Salt
I'm lost
October 2006
AUG 01, 2008 06:14 AM
MisterLinguist said:
The under-one's-breath perspective among conservatives I work with on this is that it will only mean that "fags will be more prolific."
MisterLinguist said:
The under-one's-breath perspective among conservatives I work with on this is that it will only mean that "fags will be more prolific."
I've never understood why it takes so long to approve treatments for 100% TERMINAL ALWAYS FATAL ILLNESSES. It's like, "Oh yeah, AIDS is going to kill you, but we wouldn't want you to DIE or anything..." I know, I know, "First, do no harm" and all that, but I'd say having a 100% fatal disease is already pretty much as "harmed" as you can get. Fuck, if I had AIDS and some guy in a white labcoat told me pouring bleach in my veins might cure me, I'd be at the grocery store buying Clorox within the hour.
Anybody remember that psycho chick on here who would always pop up every time there was an AIDS thread to rant on her belief in the "HIV does not cause AIDS" conspiracy theory? Whatever happened to her?
MisterLinguist said:
The under-one's-breath perspective among conservatives I work with on this is that it will only mean that "fags will be more prolific."
Yeah, now they'll breed out of control!!
Oh, wait....
No sir, They have magic to inflict upon the masses.
Keith said:
I've never understood why it takes so long to approve treatments for 100% TERMINAL ALWAYS FATAL ILLNESSES. It's like, "Oh yeah, AIDS is going to kill you, but we wouldn't want you to DIE or anything..."
Anybody remember that psycho chick on here who would always pop up every time there was an AIDS thread to rant on her belief in the "HIV does not cause AIDS" conspiracy theory?
Varuka_Salt
I'm lost
October 2006
JUL 31, 2008 09:39 PM