SAN FRANCISCO (CNN) -- San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has taken the first step toward a bid for California governor in 2010, potentially putting one of the state's most colorful politician's in the mix to replace another -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Newsom, 40, who's best known nationally as an ardent advocate for legalized gay marriage, filed papers in San Francisco on Tuesday to form an exploratory committee, which allows him to start fundraising for a potential gubernatorial campaign.
"Now more than ever, people want someone to take action and not just point fingers," Newsom said to reporters.
Holden_Caulfield said:
Can anyone tell me whether the Governator is term-limited now?
Should Newsom win the primary, will he run against the Governator or someone else?
Schwarzenegger is indeed term limited. Newsom will run against someone else if he wins the primary.
Was Gray Davis really that bad to begin with?
Not really. He basically took the fall for Enron, and the perception that he lacked charisma sealed his fate.
coyotemike said:
How did Ah-nold win in the first place?
He's a fiscal conservative (the least despicable aspect of conservativism), likes the environment, is a moderate on just about everything, and told Bush to go fuck himself several times. All this in a state that's just barely blue and (San Francisco aside) really very centrist, in a political climate that was not favorable to Democrats.
Well, that's how he won re-election. He won election in the first place because the recall election to replace Gray Davis was a madhouse free-for-all that involved some absurd number of candidates and everyone was jaded and just wanted a Governor with a pulse and a platform of some sort, and Arnold is, if nothing else, fairly charismatic. He's pretty much the exact opposite of Gray Davis, which explains his win in a nutshell.
bean said:
He won election in the first place because the recall election to replace Gray Davis was a madhouse free-for-all that involved some absurd number of candidates and everyone was jaded and just wanted a Governor with a pulse and a platform of some sort, and Arnold is, if nothing else, fairly charismatic. He's pretty much the exact opposite of Gray Davis, which explains his win in a nutshell.
Let's not forget his platform of cutting the car tax (which turned out just great) and all the free press he got.
bean said:
He won election in the first place because the recall election to replace Gray Davis was a madhouse free-for-all that involved some absurd number of candidates and everyone was jaded and just wanted a Governor with a pulse and a platform of some sort, and Arnold is, if nothing else, fairly charismatic. He's pretty much the exact opposite of Gray Davis, which explains his win in a nutshell.
Let's not forget his platform of cutting the car tax (which turned out just great) and all the free press he got.
This is the reason why I will never vote for Arnold, ever, ever, ever.
Arnold Schwarzenegger wasted little time Monday getting down to his first order of business: Repealing the immensely unpopular tripling of the car tax.
coyotemike said:
How did Ah-nold win in the first place?
He's a fiscal conservative (the least despicable aspect of conservativism), likes the environment, is a moderate on just about everything, and told Bush to go fuck himself several times. All this in a state that's just barely blue and (San Francisco aside) really very centrist, in a political climate that was not favorable to Democrats.
Well, that's how he won re-election. He won election in the first place because the recall election to replace Gray Davis was a madhouse free-for-all that involved some absurd number of candidates and everyone was jaded and just wanted a Governor with a pulse and a platform of some sort, and Arnold is, if nothing else, fairly charismatic. He's pretty much the exact opposite of Gray Davis, which explains his win in a nutshell.
Bean, I think you're looking too deeply for answers. Arnold won because he played the Terminator. I don't think people looked too closely at his politics, other than to verify that they weren't completely odious.
As for the original topic, I would be curious to see who else is running. I'll vote for any Democrat in the general, so my real choice would be in the primary. Newsom has been a very mediocre mayor of SF. He certainly hasn't been corrupt or particularly awful, but nothing has really changed or improved here either. Unfortunately he's one of the only rising stars in California Democratic politics, but who knows, maybe someone will surprise me when the primary comes around.
Newsom definitely deserves major props for making gay marriage happen, and the California ruling wouldn't have happened without him. But the gay marriage question has been settled in our state, so he would have to offer a really compelling vision for the state to earn my vote in the primary. When he ran for reelection in SF, he ran unopposed and offered no platform other than "I'll just keep at it". Which I felt was disappointing after he made very little progress during his first term.
So I'd want to see him do something impressive before he'll get my vote. I'd love to see Mark Leno run but that's not happening anytime soon. Or maybe Leno could be US Senator, replacing the evil Dianne Feinstein.
It's kind of surprising to me that DiFi hasn't run for Governor yet. I guess we should be thankful she's happy with the Senate and doesn't have aspirations for greater office.
Subrosa said:
It's kind of surprising to me that DiFi hasn't run for Governor yet. I guess we should be thankful she's happy with the Senate and doesn't have aspirations for greater office.
She'll be 79 when her current term runs out, so I've got my fingers crossed for retirement.
hk85 said:
Gray Davis was in favor of tripling registration fees, the Governator promised to repeal the increase.
This was a big issue for small business owners at the time.
s5 said:
As for the original topic, I would be curious to see who else is running. I'll vote for any Democrat in the general, so my real choice would be in the primary. Newsom has been a very mediocre mayor of SF. He certainly hasn't been corrupt or particularly awful, but nothing has really changed or improved here either. Unfortunately he's one of the only rising stars in California Democratic politics, but who knows, maybe someone will surprise me when the primary comes around.
Newsom definitely deserves major props for making gay marriage happen, and the California ruling wouldn't have happened without him. But the gay marriage question has been settled in our state, so he would have to offer a really compelling vision for the state to earn my vote in the primary. When he ran for reelection in SF, he ran unopposed and offered no platform other than "I'll just keep at it". Which I felt was disappointing after he made very little progress during his first term.
So I'd want to see him do something impressive before he'll get my vote. I'd love to see Mark Leno run but that's not happening anytime soon. Or maybe Leno could be US Senator, replacing the evil Dianne Feinstein.
John Garamendi is putting out feelers and starting to court labor unions. There has been speculation that Antonio Villaraigosa may also run. Both have stronger ties to labor than Newsome which would make it difficult for him to win the nomination.
Subrosa said:
It's kind of surprising to me that DiFi hasn't run for Governor yet. I guess we should be thankful she's happy with the Senate and doesn't have aspirations for greater office.
My guess is that Arnold will try and replace her in the Senate when her time is up. Considering how lame state politics have been in California, he'll probably win by default.
Subrosa said:
Newsom-Villaraigosa would be so Giants-Dodgers. I love it!
"Our young, philandering, telegenic Mayor is better than yours!'
I don't get the sports reference, but yeah, it'll be the battle of the mediocre mayors.
You really don't get that sports reference? I don't say that to be condescending but because I'm amazed and delighted to find someone less in touch with professional sports than I am.
Subrosa said:
It's kind of surprising to me that DiFi hasn't run for Governor yet. I guess we should be thankful she's happy with the Senate and doesn't have aspirations for greater office.
My guess is that Arnold will try and replace her in the Senate when her time is up. Considering how lame state politics have been in California, he'll probably win by default.
Subrosa said:
It's kind of surprising to me that DiFi hasn't run for Governor yet. I guess we should be thankful she's happy with the Senate and doesn't have aspirations for greater office.
My guess is that Arnold will try and replace her in the Senate when her time is up. Considering how lame state politics have been in California, he'll probably win by default.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.
I also think you're probably right.
holy fuck. at least that will help to keep him out of idaho.
Subrosa said:
It's kind of surprising to me that DiFi hasn't run for Governor yet. I guess we should be thankful she's happy with the Senate and doesn't have aspirations for greater office.
My guess is that Arnold will try and replace her in the Senate when her time is up. Considering how lame state politics have been in California, he'll probably win by default.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.
I also think you're probably right.
If we clone Boxer, the clone can run for Senate too, right?
Holden_Caulfield
Ann Arbor, MI
April 2004
JUL 01, 2008 10:08 PM