Tiger Woods Wins in Sudden Death

Go tiger. What an awesome game. Kudos to Rocco Mediate, too. His game was unorthodox, above, and beyond a lot of long games I have seen in the past.

how is this news?

Sounds like someone ought to open a Golf Group. Yuppie prick.

When did this turn into the sports that no one cares about board?

I've been watching this , i wanted Rocco to win

It does say:

Looks like a hemorrhoid sufferer from that photo .

I'm not insulted at all. Just being a smartass. Although, there are more appropriate venues for this sort of thing, I'm not going to loose any sleep over it. The lack of actual, interesting, well thought out threads is far more disturbing.

Post-op knee surgery, actually.

he seemed in real agony a few times, im impressed he made it around the whole weekend

he must be one some good meds

When I saw him at even around 15 I thought he was done. I had no idea Torrey Pines was such a difficult course.

Thanks to whoever changed the thread title. Now I can ignore it.

Your actions do not match your words.

I realize that sports isn't everyone's cup of tea, but is ignoring a thread really that hard? It was an incredible match.

I know , I keed I keed

Fantastic match.

+1

It was the lead story on CNN.

Which is an example of how real news gets shoved aside for non-events.

I don't understand why sports isn't considered REAL news.

Perhaps we need a Sports Section added to the boards?

What exactly is a lifestyle anyway? I strongly feel that sports is more appropriate under CE than Lifestyle. Lifestyle seems to be things that affect your life, but don't necessary relate to any precise moment in time. This could just be a distinction I alone hold, but it seems appropriate. And um, sports scores are news that occur at specific singularly important moments in the time-space continuum.

It's odd how you hear more bitching about sports scores than comments relating to international election outcomes.

I did see where Tiger talked some mad shit..

Like "this guy has won 2 tournaments" or something like that.

Usually when I think Tiger Woods I think of the Racial draft skit..

hahaha you're all dickheads

Hell yes

Fair enough, I'll try to keep my insane futbol ramblings to a minimum, because I don't feel like providing background for each and every post I may make after watching soccer and imbibing too much brew.

I would like, however, to posit a philosophical CE question: to what extent is background necessary? If I want to post on Estonian politics do I need to provide a history of Estonian political parties first? It's a question of perspective and education. Is the answer that we're working with a primarily American audience here? What do we use to measure how much we may have to educate/provide background for? Or perhaps we can just leave it to those who know/care can respond and those that don't can just move on to something else that they feel is more important.