TOPICS:
JUN 12, 2008 08:01 AM
JUN 12, 2008 08:02 AM
JUN 12, 2008 08:03 AM
JUN 12, 2008 08:15 AM
JUN 12, 2008 08:19 AM
commonman
USA
August 2003
JUN 12, 2008 08:19 AM
JUN 12, 2008 08:21 AM
JUN 12, 2008 08:53 AM
Subrosa said:
Stiles said:
^^^ unless you're a disaffected Republican and want to vote for Bob Barr instead of McCain - in that case, go right ahead!
Yes. That would be sweet!
Yes. Please. Go vote for a 3rd party candidate, you republicans that are embarrassed by Bush and/or McCain. Please? It would be a big help 
JUN 12, 2008 09:23 AM
coyotemike said:
Subrosa said:
Stiles said:
^^^ unless you're a disaffected Republican and want to vote for Bob Barr instead of McCain - in that case, go right ahead!
Yes. That would be sweet!
Yes. Please. Go vote for a 3rd party candidate, you republicans that are embarrassed by Bush and/or McCain. Please? It would be a big help
Or *shudder* experience a sudden urge to use your brain to vote for Obama. 
JUN 12, 2008 09:35 AM
FellOnEarth said:
coyotemike said:
Subrosa said:
Stiles said:
^^^ unless you're a disaffected Republican and want to vote for Bob Barr instead of McCain - in that case, go right ahead!
Yes. That would be sweet!
Yes. Please. Go vote for a 3rd party candidate, you republicans that are embarrassed by Bush and/or McCain. Please? It would be a big help
Or *shudder* experience a sudden urge to use your brain to vote for Obama.
That might be too much to expect.
JUN 12, 2008 10:32 AM
coyotemike said:
FellOnEarth said:
coyotemike said:
Subrosa said:
Stiles said:
^^^ unless you're a disaffected Republican and want to vote for Bob Barr instead of McCain - in that case, go right ahead!
Yes. That would be sweet!
Yes. Please. Go vote for a 3rd party candidate, you republicans that are embarrassed by Bush and/or McCain. Please? It would be a big help
Or *shudder* experience a sudden urge to use your brain to vote for Obama.
That might be too much to expect.
The latest poll from Washington has Obama favored by 18% of Republicans, up from 11% a month ago. Not only is it not too much to expect, but it's looking like it might be fairly common.
JUN 12, 2008 01:43 PM
bean said:
coyotemike said:
FellOnEarth said:
coyotemike said:
Subrosa said:
Stiles said:
^^^ unless you're a disaffected Republican and want to vote for Bob Barr instead of McCain - in that case, go right ahead!
Yes. That would be sweet!
Yes. Please. Go vote for a 3rd party candidate, you republicans that are embarrassed by Bush and/or McCain. Please? It would be a big help
Or *shudder* experience a sudden urge to use your brain to vote for Obama.
That might be too much to expect.
The latest poll from Washington has Obama favored by 18% of Republicans, up from 11% a month ago. Not only is it not too much to expect, but it's looking like it might be fairly common.
The GOP leadership never wanted McCain to win.
JUN 12, 2008 01:57 PM
coyotemike said:
According to the SCOTUS, terrorist suspects being held at Guantanamo can challenge their detention in U.S. civilian court.
Sorry to tell you, Bush, but there are rules, and they do apply to everybody.
George Bush strongly disagrees. And thinks if thats true then them rules need rewritin.
Bush suggested new legislation may now be needed to keep the American people safe.
JUN 12, 2008 02:02 PM
Chainlink said:
coyotemike said:
According to the SCOTUS, terrorist suspects being held at Guantanamo can challenge their detention in U.S. civilian court.
Sorry to tell you, Bush, but there are rules, and they do apply to everybody.
George Bush strongly disagrees.
What a dick.
Oh, wait, that's not news. Sorry, my bad.
JUN 12, 2008 02:22 PM
AceT
Portland, OR
April 2004
JUN 12, 2008 04:01 PM
Subrosa said:
Ahhhh, Kennedy. Sometimes I could just kiss you. Just sometimes, though.
Pay attention "third-party" "voters" and other assorted nitwits: This (like every single important case of the past two years) was a 5-4 decision. If you care about reproductive rights, the environment, or the right of habeas corpus, vote Obama. We're going to lose one or possibly two "liberal" justices within the next four years. A McCain presidency will change all of this.
And you don't have to look too far back to see what happens when you elect a Republican president with two vacant seats.
AceT
Portland, OR
April 2004
JUN 12, 2008 04:11 PM
JUN 12, 2008 04:41 PM
JUN 12, 2008 05:13 PM
bald_eagle said:
bean said:
Barack Obama said:
Today's Supreme Court decision ensures that we can protect our nation and bring terrorists to justice, while also protecting our core values. The Court's decision is a rejection of the Bush Administration's attempt to create a legal black hole at Guantanamo - yet another failed policy supported by John McCain. This is an important step toward reestablishing our credibility as a nation committed to the rule of law, and rejecting a false choice between fighting terrorism and respecting habeas corpus. Our courts have employed habeas corpus with rigor and fairness for more than two centuries, and we must continue to do so as we defend the freedom that violent extremists seek to destroy. We cannot afford to lose any more valuable time in the fight against terrorism to a dangerously flawed legal approach. I voted against the Military Commissions Act because its sloppiness would inevitably lead to the Court, once again, rejecting the Administration's extreme legal position. The fact is, this Administration's position is not tough on terrorism, and it undermines the very values that we are fighting to defend. Bringing these detainees to justice is too important for us to rely on a flawed system that has failed to convict anyone of a terrorist act since the 9-11 attacks, and compromised our core values.
He's taking the issue head-on. Good for him.
Obama (or, more likely, one of his staffers) just sent out a twitter about how happy he was about the decision.
Meanwhile, John McCain says he's computer illiterate.
JUN 12, 2008 05:57 PM
JUN 12, 2008 11:37 PM
JUN 12, 2008 11:52 PM
JUN 13, 2008 12:20 AM
Coyotemike
USA
May 2006
JUN 12, 2008 07:41 AM