Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67

 ... 484

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

JUN 11, 2008 11:40 PM

ChrisSick said:
Oh christ, the richest .01% of this country have the largest amount of the tax burden. Which is a world-the-fuck-away from everyone getting paid twenty dollars a month, regardless of their occupation.


You're new, so I would do well to inform you that arguing with stockula on the flawed logic of comparing per capita income is an exercise in futility.

scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

JUN 11, 2008 11:42 PM

AceT said:

ChrisSick said:
Oh christ, the richest .01% of this country have the largest amount of the tax burden. Which is a world-the-fuck-away from everyone getting paid twenty dollars a month, regardless of their occupation.


You're new, so I would do well to inform you that arguing with stockula on the flawed logic of comparing per capita income is an exercise in futility.



yeah, stock sides with Martin Luther, in the "reasoning is for heathens" sentiment.

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

JUN 11, 2008 11:44 PM

LSlice said:
While Obama's distribution is clearly superior, without spending cuts, both plans will be bad long term.


Go back to the kiddie table libby, the parents are talking.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Baton Rouge, LA
January 2006

JUN 11, 2008 11:44 PM

scylis said:

AceT said:

ChrisSick said:
Oh christ, the richest .01% of this country have the largest amount of the tax burden. Which is a world-the-fuck-away from everyone getting paid twenty dollars a month, regardless of their occupation.


You're new, so I would do well to inform you that arguing with stockula on the flawed logic of comparing per capita income is an exercise in futility.



yeah, stock sides with Martin Luther, in the "reasoning is for heathens" sentiment.



Why do you hate freedom?

LSlice

LSlice

Montclair, NJ
December 2007

JUN 11, 2008 11:48 PM

AceT said:

LSlice said:
While Obama's distribution is clearly superior, without spending cuts, both plans will be bad long term.


Go back to the kiddie table libby, the parents are talking.



That's an excellent defense of deficit spending.

scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

JUN 11, 2008 11:56 PM

RudieCantFail said:

scylis said:

AceT said:

ChrisSick said:
Oh christ, the richest .01% of this country have the largest amount of the tax burden. Which is a world-the-fuck-away from everyone getting paid twenty dollars a month, regardless of their occupation.


You're new, so I would do well to inform you that arguing with stockula on the flawed logic of comparing per capita income is an exercise in futility.



yeah, stock sides with Martin Luther, in the "reasoning is for heathens" sentiment.



Why do you hate freedom?



because i'm really the Super Devil.

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

JUN 11, 2008 11:57 PM

LSlice said:

AceT said:

LSlice said:
While Obama's distribution is clearly superior, without spending cuts, both plans will be bad long term.


Go back to the kiddie table libby, the parents are talking.



That's an excellent defense of deficit spending.


I thought so too, and it took less time than explaining why your dream world of unicorns and laissez-faire economics is unrealistic.

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUN 12, 2008 12:02 AM

AceT said:

LSlice said:

AceT said:

LSlice said:
While Obama's distribution is clearly superior, without spending cuts, both plans will be bad long term.


Go back to the kiddie table libby, the parents are talking.



That's an excellent defense of deficit spending.


I thought so too, and it took less time than explaining why your dream world of unicorns and laissez-faire economics is unrealistic.



your cynicism is really hindering my morality from evolving.

RudieCantFail

RudieCantFail

Baton Rouge, LA
January 2006

JUN 12, 2008 12:06 AM

scylis said:
because i'm really the Super Devil.



Fuckin A! Can you hook me up with some succubi?

scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

JUN 12, 2008 12:17 AM

RudieCantFail said:

scylis said:
because i'm really the Super Devil.



Fuckin A! Can you hook me up with some succubi?



nope. too busy jumpin' canyons on my flying motorcycle and punching babies.

i was going to find a bitchin' picture of myself, but i found this instead. enjoy:

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JUN 12, 2008 05:20 AM

AceT said:

ChrisSick said:
Oh christ, the richest .01% of this country have the largest amount of the tax burden. Which is a world-the-fuck-away from everyone getting paid twenty dollars a month, regardless of their occupation.


You're new, so I would do well to inform you that arguing with stockula on the flawed logic of comparing per capita income is an exercise in futility.



Not at all, I was here for the glory days of Stockula posting pictures of John Kerry with captions in French and passing that off as both discourse and wit.

I know what I'm getting into, but like a decent horror movie, I can still be shocked by him.

Hooraydiation

Hooraydiation

Boston, MA
October 2005

JUN 12, 2008 05:47 AM

I wish 90% of Americans understood this.

CodyW

CodyW

Lubbock, TX
December 2004

JUN 12, 2008 05:54 AM

FellOnEarth said:
Here's a simple equation: Rollback the Bush tax cuts, balance the budget. Withdraw from Iraq, generate a surplus. Invest in technology and education and achieve long-term innovative and economic advantage. Finally PAY DOWN THE CRIPPLING DEBT!!!



This is why I'm voting for Obama. He's the only one with the possibility of being elected that has a decent plan for getting rid of our national debt.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

JUN 12, 2008 06:05 AM

stockula said:


Punishing the poor for being poor and useless and not giving them a security net will spur them to be productive and not a useless drain on the productive.




Ok, so according to you, if someone is poor, they are useless.

I don't know if you can wrap your brain around this (since its existance is still questionable), but lets try anyway.

Who are the poor people? They are farmers, teachers, factory workers, retail employees, restaurant workers, day-care workers, home health care workers, nurses, students, civil employees, public defenders, homemakers, house cleaners, carpenters, artists, writers, dancers . . . want I should go on? These are all people who, in many cases, make 30k per year or less. If they have even one child, they are living in poverty or near poverty.

Which of these people are useless, stockula? Other than yourself, that is.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

JUN 12, 2008 06:25 AM

scylis said:

RudieCantFail said:

scylis said:

AceT said:

ChrisSick said:
Oh christ, the richest .01% of this country have the largest amount of the tax burden. Which is a world-the-fuck-away from everyone getting paid twenty dollars a month, regardless of their occupation.


You're new, so I would do well to inform you that arguing with stockula on the flawed logic of comparing per capita income is an exercise in futility.



yeah, stock sides with Martin Luther, in the "reasoning is for heathens" sentiment.



Why do you hate freedom?



because i'm really the Super Devil.



*Shoots wildly into the air.*

Ahh family guy.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next