Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68

 ... 484

Next

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUN 08, 2008 05:19 PM

For those of us who think that carbon dioxide emissions are "just" a cause of climate change, here's a reason to think again.

It's not just ten million displaced Bangladeshis, the loss of coastal cities (Miami, London, and New Orleans spring to mind), and perhaps famine in Europe (if the North Atlantic Conveyor shuts down permanently) that you need to worry about. The sea itself is becoming more acid.

We are starting to see major changes in marine ecologies, directly related to carbon dioxide emissions.

Some of the extra CO2 emitted enters the oceans, acidifying waters globally.



"It's clear that marine food webs as we know them are going to alter, and biodiversity will decrease,"

.
An awful lot of people rely on fish as their main protein source. (How many? A billion people get 30% or more of their protein from fish.)

These observations confirm that some of the processes seen in laboratory experiments and some of the predictions made by computer models of ocean ecosystems do also happen in the real world.



Last month, scientists reported that water with CO2 levels high enough to be "corrosive" to marine life was
rising up off the western US coast.



"The reason that the oceans are becoming more acidic is because of the CO2 emissions that we are producing from burning fossil fuels," observed Dr Turley.

"Add CO2 to seawater and you get carbonic acid; it's simple chemistry, and therefore certain.

"This means that the only way of reducing the future impact of ocean acidification is the urgent, substantial reduction in CO2 emissions."




The faster we cut carbon dioxide emissions, the better.

stockula

stockula

Anchorage, AK
May 2003

JUN 08, 2008 05:34 PM

How can atmospheric CO2 acidify water? Especially on a scale that would affect sealife?

You guys will fall for anything, won't you?

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

JUN 08, 2008 05:37 PM

stockula said:
How can CO2 acidify water? Especially on a scale that would affect sealife?

You guys will fall for anything, won't you?



It's called "seawater." It has a different chemical composition than H2O.

My bad. CO2 will create carbonic acid in freshwater too.

Varuka_Salt

Varuka_Salt

I'm lost
October 2006

JUN 08, 2008 05:38 PM

8th grade chemistry?

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

JUN 08, 2008 05:41 PM

Carbonic acid is the result of mixing carbon dioxide and seawater, resulting in H2CO3. It's a weak acid. I would wager a guess and say that fish don't like acid, even a weak one.

Varuka_Salt

Varuka_Salt

I'm lost
October 2006

JUN 08, 2008 05:41 PM


stockula said:



stockula

stockula

Anchorage, AK
May 2003

JUN 08, 2008 05:42 PM

Entire oceans?

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

JUN 08, 2008 05:47 PM

Here.

The reason involves some basic chemistry. When CO2 gas dissolves in seawater, it combines with water molecules (H2O) to form carbonic acid (H2CO3). The acid releases hydrogen ions into the water. The more hydrogen ions in a solution, the more acidic it becomes. Hydrogen ions in ocean surface waters are now 25 percent higher than in the pre-industrial era, with an additional 75-percent increase projected by 2100.



The problem is, acidic conditions are corrosive to already formed calcium carbonate, and they also make it harder for organisms to build such hard parts in the first place.



There are plenty of sea critters (not to mention coral reefs) that use calcium carbonate to build shells and other protective structures. You harm one group of creature, then any other creature that depends on it will suffer - it's called the circle of life. Watch the Lion King. wink

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

JUN 08, 2008 05:49 PM

Oh snap!

From corals to sea snails to microscopic plankton, the creatures affected underpin many ocean food chains, say the authors of the report, a document reflecting the views of 50 top experts in ocean chemistry. The research was sponsored by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other federal agencies.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUN 08, 2008 06:12 PM

stockula said:
How can atmospheric CO2 acidify water? Especially on a scale that would affect sealife?

You guys will fall for anything, won't you?



Always pleased to hit a nerve. What are you so worried about? If it's not happening, you need to find sources, don't you?

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUN 08, 2008 06:27 PM

bald_eagle said:

SockPuppet said:

stockula said:
How can atmospheric CO2 acidify water? Especially on a scale that would affect sealife?

You guys will fall for anything, won't you?



Always pleased to hit a nerve. What are you so worried about? If it's not happening, you need to find sources, don't you?


Oh, no. He only needs to make a snide comment, then scurry back to his troll hideaway.

stockula don't need no stinkin' sources.



Ah well. At least he's abandoned Stockulogic®.

LSlice

LSlice

Montclair, NJ
December 2007

JUN 08, 2008 10:16 PM

The Senate voted down the adoption of the Kyoto protocol goals.

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

USA
OLD SKOOL

JUN 08, 2008 11:39 PM

stockula said:
How can atmospheric CO2 acidify water? Especially on a scale that would affect sealife?

You guys will fall for anything, won't you?



Please provide a source not just disputing, but asserting with scientific proof that this isn't happening.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

JUN 09, 2008 09:10 AM


The spring 08 special edition of Discover magazine has an interesting article about using the oceans to pull carbon out of the atmosphere to alleviate global warming, though apparently recent studies are showing that not enough carbon is locked up and sunk into the deep waters to make a discernible effect and it may in fact exasperate the problem.

The theory involves seeding the oceans with iron. The iron is an essential nutrient for phytoplankton and algae. The basics have been realized for nearly 20 years or more.
Large blooms use the carbon from the air through photosynthesis and release oxygen, like a tree. They use the carbon, lock it up in their body structure, die and sink to the bottom.
Trouble seems to be they have proved to be remarkably efficient recyclers and as much as 95% sinks only 1000 feet or less then resurfaces, is eaten by predators who then respire carbon dioxide, or is otherwise released back into the atmosphere.
It also turns out to be incredibly difficult to measure exactly how much carbon is actually sinking down into the deep ocean.

I wonder though, if this process would also lock up CO2 that is dissolved in the water and causing the excessive acidity ? The net loss of CO2 in the environment may be negligible but it might at least balance the ph of ocean surface waters long enough to figure out a legitimate solution ?

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 09, 2008 10:16 AM

stockula said:
Entire oceans?



at least the ones with water in them.

Quirky

Quirky

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

JUN 09, 2008 10:19 AM

Chainlink said:

The spring 08 special edition of Discover magazine has an interesting article about using the oceans to pull carbon out of the atmosphere to alleviate global warming, though apparently recent studies are showing that not enough carbon is locked up and sunk into the deep waters to make a discernible effect and it may in fact exasperate the problem.

The theory involves seeding the oceans with iron. The iron is an essential nutrient for phytoplankton and algae. The basics have been realized for nearly 20 years or more.
Large blooms use the carbon from the air through photosynthesis and release oxygen, like a tree. They use the carbon, lock it up in their body structure, die and sink to the bottom.
Trouble seems to be they have proved to be remarkably efficient recyclers and as much as 95% sinks only 1000 feet or less then resurfaces, is eaten by predators who then respire carbon dioxide, or is otherwise released back into the atmosphere.
It also turns out to be incredibly difficult to measure exactly how much carbon is actually sinking down into the deep ocean.

I wonder though, if this process would also lock up CO2 that is dissolved in the water and causing the excessive acidity ? The net loss of CO2 in the environment may be negligible but it might at least balance the ph of ocean surface waters long enough to figure out a legitimate solution ?



It would create such a dead zone that trillions of underwater sea life will be lost.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

JUN 09, 2008 10:26 AM

Big_McLargehuge said:

Chainlink said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)


The spring 08 special edition of Discover magazine has an interesting article about using the oceans to pull carbon out of the atmosphere to alleviate global warming, though apparently recent studies are showing that not enough carbon is locked up and sunk into the deep waters to make a discernible effect and it may in fact exasperate the problem.

The theory involves seeding the oceans with iron. The iron is an essential nutrient for phytoplankton and algae. The basics have been realized for nearly 20 years or more.
Large blooms use the carbon from the air through photosynthesis and release oxygen, like a tree. They use the carbon, lock it up in their body structure, die and sink to the bottom.
Trouble seems to be they have proved to be remarkably efficient recyclers and as much as 95% sinks only 1000 feet or less then resurfaces, is eaten by predators who then respire carbon dioxide, or is otherwise released back into the atmosphere.
It also turns out to be incredibly difficult to measure exactly how much carbon is actually sinking down into the deep ocean.

I wonder though, if this process would also lock up CO2 that is dissolved in the water and causing the excessive acidity ? The net loss of CO2 in the environment may be negligible but it might at least balance the ph of ocean surface waters long enough to figure out a legitimate solution ?



It would create such a dead zone that trillions of underwater sea life will be lost.



I'm afraid you mis-understand. It provides nourishment to dead zones and causes massive plankton blooms which in turn are eaten by a huge number of sea creatures.
Thats a big part of the problem with the theory as a carbon sink, too much of the plankton gets eaten and CO2 then released back into the environment instead of sinking all the way to the bottom and staying there, as I understand it.

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

JUN 09, 2008 04:00 PM

Oh man, stockula made me laugh and laugh.

"Entire oceans?"

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUN 09, 2008 04:29 PM

stockula said:
Entire oceans?



zoom image

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

USA
OLD SKOOL

JUN 09, 2008 05:22 PM

FearTheReaper said:

stockula said:
Entire oceans?



zoom image



zoom image

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

JUN 09, 2008 05:32 PM

Evapotranspiration. I learned a new word.