Indiana's Democratic primary was open to all voters. About one in five said they were independents and one in 10 identified themselves as Republican.
I don't understand what possible logic is in play there.
What do you mean?
Why they would let registered Republicans vote in the Democratic primary.
That just makes no sense to me.
People registered as Independent, sure ... but Republicans?
Because they want to race to continue. They are mostly voting for Hillary, because she has basically already lost and is doing the job of the right wing on Obama. They don't have to spend any money on attack ads, they get tons of clips to pick from when they do make their ads.
It's all about extending the race and keeping doddering old man McCain out of the spotlight longer.
That doesn't explain why they're doing it, though, as I'm sure this decision was made long before they even knew who the candidates would be or how the road to the nomination(s) would be going.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the whole point of a Primary election is to allow that party's voters to select the candidate for the General Election.
Why would whoever makes the rules in Indiana allow Republicans to vote in the Democratic primary or vice versa? It goes against the whole concept of primary elections.
FearTheReaper said:
Because they want to race to continue. They are mostly voting for Hillary, because she has basically already lost and is doing the job of the right wing on Obama. They don't have to spend any money on attack ads, they get tons of clips to pick from when they do make their ads.
It's all about extending the race and keeping doddering old man McCain out of the spotlight longer
That doesn't explain why they're doing it, though, as I'm sure this decision was made long before they even knew who the candidates would be or how the road to the nomination(s) would be going.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the whole point of a Primary election is to allow that party's voters to select the candidate for the General Election.
Why would whoever makes the rules in Indiana allow Republicans to vote in the Democratic primary or vice versa? It goes against the whole concept of primary elections.
.
Well, a lot of states allow this. The idea being they want the candidate who can best win the general election and appeals to more people.
It makes sense to want Independents to vote, but I' don't get allowing Republicans to vote.
crispy said:
That doesn't explain why they're doing it, though, as I'm sure this decision was made long before they even knew who the candidates would be or how the road to the nomination(s) would be going.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the whole point of a Primary election is to allow that party's voters to select the candidate for the General Election.
Why would whoever makes the rules in Indiana allow Republicans to vote in the Democratic primary or vice versa? It goes against the whole concept of primary elections.
Read my comment immediately below the one you quoted.
Then, if you're a Republican and you want your guy to ultimately win, wouldn't you then vote for whoever you feel has the best chance to lose to your guy?
I dunno. Makes no sense to me.
[edit]
I read your comment, bean ... I still don't get it, though.
Just another in the long list of things I don't understand.
crispy said:
Then, if you're a Republican and you want your guy to ultimately win, wouldn't you then vote for whoever you feel has the best chance to lose to your guy?
I dunno. Makes no sense to me.
[edit]
I read your comment, bean ... I still don't get it, though.
Just another in the long list of things I don't understand.
The idea is that if someone cares enough about a candidate to totally cross party lines in an open election, than their vote should be taken into account. Because most of the time, both parties figure out a candidate around the same time. It's unusual for a contest to go this long on one side while having been decided for months on the other side, so this year is an anomaly.
In short, yes, it allows for exactly that sort of gaming, but it's not usually a concern since Republicans are usually too busy picking their own candidate, if there's still a race going on.
crispy said:
Then, if you're a Republican and you want your guy to ultimately win, wouldn't you then vote for whoever you feel has the best chance to lose to your guy?
.
Indeed. That's why they are voting for Clinton. Obama has massive crossover appeal and carries more independent voters.
McCain won from cross over voters so its not just evil Republicans with their vast right wing consperacy to all vote for Hillary. Both partys allow this but it just depeneds on the states party so its not like Republicans forced Democrats to have a open primary and last i heard Obama and Hillary are splitting the Republican vote.
Obama's doing better than expected in most of the counties that have reported results so far. If that trend continues, we may actually have a close race in IN.
A close race in IN and a blowout in NC means Obama gets the favorable headlines tomorrow morning, regardless of how IN ends up going.
Indiana's Democratic primary was open to all voters. About one in five said they were independents and one in 10 identified themselves as Republican.
What do you mean?
Why they would let registered Republicans vote in the Democratic primary.
That just makes no sense to me.
People registered as Independent, sure ... but Republicans?
Because they want to race to continue. They are mostly voting for Hillary, because she has basically already lost and is doing the job of the right wing on Obama. They don't have to spend any money on attack ads, they get tons of clips to pick from when they do make their ads.
It's all about extending the race and keeping doddering old man McCain out of the spotlight longer.
That doesn't explain why they're doing it, though, as I'm sure this decision was made long before they even knew who the candidates would be or how the road to the nomination(s) would be going.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the whole point of a Primary election is to allow that party's voters to select the candidate for the General Election.
Why would whoever makes the rules in Indiana allow Republicans to vote in the Democratic primary or vice versa? It goes against the whole concept of primary elections.
------------------------------------------------------
the source that was quoted said that 1 in 10 IDENTIFIED themselves as Republicans. that doesnt mean they are officially registered as republicans. Here in this state, we dont register affiliation with one party or another. While I IDENTIFY myself as a Dem, as far as voter registration goes, on election day, no one knows except me, G-d and my bank account that back and donate to the democratic party.
My thinking is that they don't have any sort of official affiliation either
bluevalentine said:
the source that was quoted said that 1 in 10 IDENTIFIED themselves as Republicans. that doesnt mean they are officially registered as republicans. Here in this state, we dont register affiliation with one party or another. While I IDENTIFY myself as a Dem, as far as voter registration goes, on election day, no one knows except me, G-d and my bank account that back and donate to the democratic party.
My thinking is that they don't have any sort of official affiliation either
Well, they could have identified as an independent. I lean Democrat, but if asked would identify as an independent, so I don't really buy your argument.
bluevalentine said:
the source that was quoted said that 1 in 10 IDENTIFIED themselves as Republicans. that doesnt mean they are officially registered as republicans. Here in this state, we dont register affiliation with one party or another. While I IDENTIFY myself as a Dem, as far as voter registration goes, on election day, no one knows except me, G-d and my bank account that back and donate to the democratic party.
My thinking is that they don't have any sort of official affiliation either
Well, they could have identified as an independent. I lean Democrat, but if asked would identify as an independent, so I don't really buy your argument.
isn't it open so anyone can vote for anyone in indiana?
bald_eagle said:
Clinton's lead in Indiana has reduced to 10 points. The northwest counties will probably come in last, and heavily favor Obama. CBS may be premature.
*Crosses fingers*
I was wondering about Gary, Michigan City etc. This is good news. Other Obama territory seems to include Indianapolis and, of course, the University in Bloomington.
bluevalentine said:
the source that was quoted said that 1 in 10 IDENTIFIED themselves as Republicans. that doesnt mean they are officially registered as republicans. Here in this state, we dont register affiliation with one party or another. While I IDENTIFY myself as a Dem, as far as voter registration goes, on election day, no one knows except me, G-d and my bank account that back and donate to the democratic party.
My thinking is that they don't have any sort of official affiliation either
Well, they could have identified as an independent. I lean Democrat, but if asked would identify as an independent, so I don't really buy your argument.
isn't it open so anyone can vote for anyone in indiana?
ckdexterhaven
USA
December 2005
MAY 06, 2008 04:33 PM