Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85

 ... 484

Next

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 19, 2007 07:22 AM

Investigators gain necessary security clearances days into tenure of new AG

WASHINGTON - The Justice Department has reopened a long-dormant inquiry into the government's warrantless wiretapping program, a major policy shift only days into the tenure of new Attorney General Michael Mukasey.

The investigation by the department's Office of Professional Responsibility was shut down last year, after the investigators were denied security clearances. Gonzales told Congress that President Bush, not he, denied the clearances.

"We recently received the necessary security clearances and are now able to proceed with our investigation," H. Marshall Jarrett, counsel for the OPR, wrote to Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y. A copy of the letter, dated Tuesday, was obtained by The Associated Press.

Hinchey and other Democrats have long sought an investigation into the spying program to see if it complies with the law. Efforts to investigate the program have been rebuffed by the Bush administration.

"I am happily surprised," Hinchey said. "It now seems because we have a new attorney general the situation has changed. Maybe this attorney general understands that his obligation is not to be the private counsel to the president but the chief law enforcement officer for the entire country."



Full Story

Mukasey may have some balls after all.

Kindle

Kindle

Houston, TX
March 2006

NOV 19, 2007 07:27 AM

Huh, whoda thunk it.

Toku666

Toku666

Columbus, OH
May 2004

NOV 19, 2007 08:36 AM

What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG, allow the investigation, then (shockingly) find no evidence of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

NOV 19, 2007 08:40 AM

Toku666 said:
What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG, allow the investigation, then (shockingly) find no evidence of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?


You live to crush hope, don't you?

Kindle

Kindle

Houston, TX
March 2006

NOV 19, 2007 08:58 AM

Toku666 said:
What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG, allow the investigation, then (shockingly) find no evidence of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?


Please, like our government would sink that low *scoffs*
surreal

soulcompromise

soulcompromise

I'm lost
November 2006

NOV 20, 2007 10:30 PM



Hinchey and other Democrats have long sought an investigation into the spying program to see if it complies with the law. Efforts to investigate the program have been rebuffed by the Bush administration.



that's good news... at least they're talking about it.

Kindle

Kindle

Houston, TX
March 2006

NOV 20, 2007 10:58 PM

bald_eagle said:

Kindle said:

Toku666 said:
What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG, allow the investigation, then (shockingly) find no evidence of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?


Please, like our government would sink that low *scoffs*
surreal



I don't think it would have to sink to be that low.


I was hoping the surreal emoticon would denote the sarcasm dripping from that statement. Sadly, I agree with you.

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

USA
OLD SKOOL

NOV 20, 2007 11:01 PM

zoom image

Kindle

Kindle

Houston, TX
March 2006

NOV 21, 2007 12:03 PM

bald_eagle said:

Kindle said:

bald_eagle said:

Kindle said:

Toku666 said:
What if they only stonewalled long enough to figure out they could switch to a new AG, allow the investigation, then (shockingly) find no evidence of wrongdoing after being given nearly a year to hide evidence?


Please, like our government would sink that low *scoffs*
surreal



I don't think it would have to sink to be that low.


I was hoping the surreal emoticon would denote the sarcasm dripping from that statement. Sadly, I agree with you.


I understood. I was just adding to it.


I had a feeling you did. Just wanted to be sure.