A Serious Discussion of Political Tit-tays

There are few people as obsessed with my tits (and their socio-political meaning) as I am, other than my exes and a few of my readers, so perhaps it stands to reason that I have become intrigued by the range of boobs among the potential First Ladies _ and what they could mean for their husbands' candidacies. To put that in to context, I spent much of yesterday examining the breasts of their predecessors to see what America really wants out of the knockers of the wife of the Commander-in-Chief. My findings, with an accompanying photo gallery (!), after the jump.

The ta-tas of modern first ladies (which you may view at your leisure in this gallery) mostly come in 4 varieties: feminine-but-petite boobies (Jackie Kennedy, Rosalynn Carter); don't-look-at-them-I'm-not-a
-sexual-being breasts (Lady Bird Johnson, Pat Nixon, Hillary Clinton); motherly-but-possibly-sexual bazooms (Barbara Bush and Laura Bush _ oh, no, I'm not kidding); and missing-in-action (Betty Ford, Nancy Reagan). With the exception of the Johnson to Nixon transition, however, American has not elected the same kind of boobs twice in a row.

NoPantsDave said:
Dude, you have way too much time on your hands.

That said, based on this, I think I may pull for Kucinch.

crispy said:
Elizabeth Kucinich is a babe.