Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90

 ... 484

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 27, 2007 03:18 AM



The young kids today love to text message. This has caused political action groups to start text-messaging programs to get their message out. For the most part, the politicians and advocacy groups that use texts are liberal. The reason for that is because conservatives are usually too stupid to understand modern technology and they are poor, often only possessing an AM radio.

The National Right to Life Committee, an anti-abortion group, does not have anything to do with text messages. But their counterpart, Naral Pro-Choice America has a very active text-messaging program. Except on Verizon, because the company has rejected Naral’s request to set up a text-messaging program. Turns out that Verizon doesn't allow “controversial or unsavory” text messages.


In turning down the program, Verizon, one of the nation’s two largest wireless carriers, told Naral that it does not accept programs from any group “that seeks to promote an agenda or distribute content that, in its discretion, may be seen as controversial or unsavory to any of our users.”



    PLZ keep ABortIN LEGZ. 4EAE KEWL


Wow, I kind of get what Verizon is saying. That may be the most controversial and unsavory thing I have ever typed. My fingers need a bleach bath. If I had actually texted that, Verizon may have gotten AIDS.

Yet, Verizon has no obligation to accept every political action group that comes along. The First Amendment limits governments but private companies can do whatever the hell they want. What would stop Verizon from restricting text messages, is a threat by all their customers to drop the company if they did not change their policy. But that will never happen, because we live in America, home of the lazy complainer.

This is a very odd decision for a company to make, however. Verizon has decided to forgo profits for…what? So that people won’t communicate “controversial” messages? What the fuck is that? They are a communications company, whose sole purpose is to provide people ways to communicate and to make boat loads of cash. They shouldn’t give a shit what those communications are. And yet they do. This is the scary side of our massive corporate controlled world. This is why so many people are concerned about Net Neutrality.


“This is right at the heart of the problem,” said Susan Crawford, a visiting professor at the University of Michigan law school, referring to the treatment of text messages. “The fact that wireless companies can choose to discriminate is very troubling.”


Just a bit. Fortunately other wireless companies have accepted the Naral text program. Their customers can get messages from Naral, like this one.


End Bush’s global gag rule against birth control for world’s poorest women! Call Congress. (202) 224-3121. Thnx! Naral Text4Choice.


But Verizon customers, who are paying the company to provide them with wireless service, will not get any text messages. Even if they want them. Thankfully, we live in a free market world. All they have to do is break their contract, pay the massive fee and then sign up with another company. That way they can punish Verizon by giving them a big check. It’s the free market!

drjones23

drjones23

Colorado Springs, CO
August 2007

SEP 27, 2007 09:19 AM

For the record, Verizon has already backed down on this:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21011328/

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

SEP 27, 2007 09:20 AM

I would not appreciate spam texts of anything but at least we know where they stand on the issue.

Could explain some of my "problems" with my internet (Verizon) shocked

Dr_Pwnage

Dr_Pwnage

Gainesville, FL
February 2005

SEP 27, 2007 09:42 AM

I personally do not think that my phone number should be given to anybody anywhere for advertising purposes or to spread any sort of message at all. It is an assault on the senses every minute of every day. It's the reason I don't watch TV. Now even my video games have advertising IN GAME. Fuck this; I don't want anybody pushing me to subscribe to their agenda.

Next thing you know, the administration is going to get a record of Naral's message logs, track down all the customers that opened the messages, and blackmail them into writing their congressman about their righteous and quiet anger over Roe vs. Wade.

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

SEP 27, 2007 10:16 AM

buzzsaw71 said:
I personally do not think that my phone number should be given to anybody anywhere for advertising purposes or to spread any sort of message at all. It is an assault on the senses every minute of every day. It's the reason I don't watch TV. Now even my video games have advertising IN GAME. Fuck this; I don't want anybody pushing me to subscribe to their agenda.

Next thing you know, the administration is going to get a record of Naral's message logs, track down all the customers that opened the messages, and blackmail them into writing their congressman about their righteous and quiet anger over Roe vs. Wade.



You sign up for updates.

freshprncebelair

freshprncebelair

Ellicott City, MD
June 2004

SEP 27, 2007 10:25 AM

Verizon decides it would rather reap the profits of text messaging than police its users

LostLucy

LostLucy

USA
December 2006

SEP 27, 2007 10:35 AM

First, this must violate freedom of speech from some angle, no?? not without NET NEUTRALITY being secured?

Second -- this is a DAMN GOOD REASON not to buy an iphone
APPLE should speak out against Verizon, and use this to negate their deal for exclusive rights to their phones!

[yeah, not a legal scholar but pretty pissed!]

mad mad

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 27, 2007 10:38 AM

magpieboy said:

buzzsaw71 said:
I personally do not think that my phone number should be given to anybody anywhere for advertising purposes or to spread any sort of message at all. It is an assault on the senses every minute of every day. It's the reason I don't watch TV. Now even my video games have advertising IN GAME. Fuck this; I don't want anybody pushing me to subscribe to their agenda.

Next thing you know, the administration is going to get a record of Naral's message logs, track down all the customers that opened the messages, and blackmail them into writing their congressman about their righteous and quiet anger over Roe vs. Wade.



You sign up for updates.



Was it really that hard to understand? LIke I'm going to write a pro cell phone spam article. Get a grip people...

freckle

freckle

Seattle, WA
January 2003

SEP 27, 2007 11:02 AM

LostLucy said:
First, this must violate freedom of speech from some angle, no?? not without NET NEUTRALITY being secured?

Second -- this is a DAMN GOOD REASON not to buy an iphone
APPLE should speak out against Verizon, and use this to negate their deal for exclusive rights to their phones!

[yeah, not a legal scholar but pretty pissed!]

mad mad



iphones are at&t.

LostLucy

LostLucy

USA
December 2006

SEP 27, 2007 11:14 AM

Freckle said

iphones are AT&T






NEVERMIND!!!

blush

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

SEP 27, 2007 11:16 AM

freckle said:

LostLucy said:
First, this must violate freedom of speech from some angle, no?? not without NET NEUTRALITY being secured?

Second -- this is a DAMN GOOD REASON not to buy an iphone
APPLE should speak out against Verizon, and use this to negate their deal for exclusive rights to their phones!

[yeah, not a legal scholar but pretty pissed!]

mad mad



iphones are at&t.



Go ahead and don't buy an iPhone if you want...

It's not going to change AT&T's position on Network Neutrality either way. There would have to be an outright, coordinated boycott of AT&T's services to make a serious impact. The best way to get Network Neutrality into law, right now, is too contribute a few bucks to lobbying groups like SaveTheInternet.com and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Apple's always been a bit of a more progressive corporation anyways, you'd be affecting their revenue more than AT&T's. (But they are still slaves to their corporate interests, so I doubt you'll see Apple taking on AT&T over Network Neutrality).

drexl

drexl

Detroit, MI
January 2003

SEP 27, 2007 11:54 AM

i love my iphone

Quirky

Quirky

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

SEP 27, 2007 12:33 PM

LostLucy said:
Freckle said

iphones are AT&T






NEVERMIND!!!

blush



That's not Emily Litella. That's Rozanne Rozannadanna.

SouGei

SouGei

Blackwood, NJ
January 2007

SEP 27, 2007 12:49 PM

If I start getting spam texts from anyone I'm burning everything I own and living in a cave.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 27, 2007 01:21 PM

jimhaku said:
If I start getting spam texts from anyone I'm burning everything I own and living in a cave.



Right. This is not about spamming. You would sign up for it. sigh.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

SEP 27, 2007 01:26 PM

FearTheReaper said:

jimhaku said:
If I start getting spam texts from anyone I'm burning everything I own and living in a cave.


Right. This is not about spamming. You would sign up for it. sigh.


Man, I hate spam. Verizon is totally right to prevent spam from making it onto my cellphone. I'm switching to Verizon right now.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 27, 2007 01:27 PM

Zarth said:

FearTheReaper said:

jimhaku said:
If I start getting spam texts from anyone I'm burning everything I own and living in a cave.


Right. This is not about spamming. You would sign up for it. sigh.


Man, I hate spam. Verizon is totally right to prevent spam from making it onto my cellphone. I'm switching to Verizon right now.



(cut to tear rolling down my cheek)

sarahg

sarahg

I'm lost
November 2004

SEP 27, 2007 01:28 PM

Verizon sent some shit out in the mail about changes to the way they share your information to outside companies and partners.

If you are a Verizon customer, you should have already received it. If not, contact them and ask. I cannot recall off the top of my head whether you have to opt-in or opt-out. But if it's opt-out, you will definitely have to look into doing so, or they will be sharing your info for spammy purposes.

Just sayin'.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

SEP 27, 2007 01:31 PM

FearTheReaper said:

Zarth said:

FearTheReaper said:

jimhaku said:
If I start getting spam texts from anyone I'm burning everything I own and living in a cave.


Right. This is not about spamming. You would sign up for it. sigh.


Man, I hate spam. Verizon is totally right to prevent spam from making it onto my cellphone. I'm switching to Verizon right now.


(cut to tear rolling down my cheek)


Nice to know my work is appreciated.

dingoes8

dingoes8

Milwaukee, WI
March 2004

SEP 27, 2007 01:33 PM

OMG, INBD

LostLucy

LostLucy

USA
December 2006

SEP 27, 2007 02:20 PM

That was hilarious Zarth!! biggrin

seriously,
savetheinternet.com is a good source and cites both AT&T and Verizon as violating consumer right to neutraility -- even if Verizon might be caving in now! thanks .KUNGFOO

OK so....

my bad blush


_poptard_ said

That's not EMily Litella









NEVERMIND!!



RIP Gilda.

Gylrek

Gylrek

Chula Vista, CA
August 2007

SEP 27, 2007 03:11 PM

i don't really care what the message is . what I don't need is spam messages on my phone, it's not like there isn't enough on the internet.

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

SEP 27, 2007 04:01 PM

Gylrek said:
i don't really care what the message is . what I don't need is spam messages on my phone, it's not like there isn't enough on the internet.



What part of "a service you sign up for" do you not understand?

Seriously, I'm curious as to how you could interpret this to be about spam messages.

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

SEP 27, 2007 04:13 PM

joker_ said:

Gylrek said:
i don't really care what the message is . what I don't need is spam messages on my phone, it's not like there isn't enough on the internet.



What part of "a service you sign up for" do you not understand?

Seriously, I'm curious as to how you could interpret this to be about spam messages.


^ ^ ^ ^
Fuck, I signed up for SG and now I'm seeing these spam messages from joker_.

makebelieve

makebelieve

Winston Salem, NC
February 2007

SEP 27, 2007 04:57 PM

FearTheReaper said:

jimhaku said:
If I start getting spam texts from anyone I'm burning everything I own and living in a cave.



Right. This is not about spamming. You would sign up for it. sigh.



Should have mentioned that fact in your article. Sigh. Besides, you would always get that initial "sign up by replying to this text message", uh, text message. And that would piss me off if I got that shit being an evil pro-lifer and all. I think there are other ways to get your information out. Thanks Verizon for working for me!

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next