If goofy old Marilyn Monroe movies ever taught me anything, it's that being a gentleman's illicit plaything can be a pretty sweet deal as long as there's some ice to back it up.
Wait. No.
If goofy old Marilyn Monroe movies ever taught me anything, it's that you can always rely on diamonds to stay true when nothing else in the world is left. I'd wager she wasn't referring to tectonic plates and the history of the earth when she shimmied down that red carpet all a-sparkle, but no one ever said those certain rocks were only ever good for emotional bartering and morale boosts. Just last week, for example, geologists in Australia discovered a real treasure amongst the mystic zircon crystals of Jack Hills -- four-billion year old diamonds, the oldest identified fragments of earth crust to date. This is quite awesome for a few reasons, listed below in no particular order of importance:
1.) Said geologists are now in the clear as far as Christmas presents for their girlfriends this year.
2.) Diamonds are unlikely to contain preserved insects and the like within their core, meaning no additional chances for prehistoric horrors and smug Jeff Goldblums, because Lord knows there's enough of that going around already.
3.) The presence and composite of these diamonds make them possible keys to understanding just how (and when) our planet came into existence.
The time between the creation of the Earth around 4.5 billion years ago and the formation of the oldest known rocks some 500 million years later is known as the Hadean period -- the "dark ages" of geology.
Many geologists have traditionally thought of it as a time when the surface of the planet was a mass of molten lava. But the discovery of the ancient diamonds, reported in the journal Nature, challenges that view.
See, since diamonds are created under extreme amounts of physical pressure or neurotic stress, the common train of thought was that no diamond could date back beyond a couple billion years tops, on account of the the general idea that the earth was chunky molten soup at that point, unsettled and ill-equipped to produce much more than pumice stone. Obviously, this newly-found old ice throws a wrench in that whole idea, suggesting instead that the Earth's crust was already fully-baked and golden as far back as 4.25 billion years ago.
"These latest findings indicate that the planet was already cooling and forming a crust much earlier than previously thought," Alexander Nemchin, an expert in geochemistry at Australia's Curtin University of Technology and one of Menneken's co-researchers, said in a statement.
I'm somewhat interested to see what the revisionist history set would have to say about all of this, on account of the continuing differences of opinion in the assumed age of our planet and all, but I'm sure it would just fall boringly along the same old lines of faulty carbon-dating and erroneous logic. Still, one can hope for something entertaining. Perhaps Adam bought Eve her engagement ring at De Beers, or something equally tre romantic. Regardless of that silliness, however, I know this much is true: from the time the ground formed beneath us -- well, I could go with the Monroe clip, but I think Ms. Bassey sums up the rest of our point most succintly. Take us home, Shirls.
_DictionaryGirl_ knows that we are living in a material world, and she is a material girl. Now: everybody, quick! Stare ominously at Margot_Dent. Then applaud her for the link, the boss title, and her killer sense of style.
I, for one, am not a huge fan of paying ridiculous amounts of money for a rock, whether it be a diamond or a ruby or whatever. Apparently, I'm easy and cheap. Must be why my husband married me.
Diamonds are crap. Unless they're a pretty natural color... Or four billion years old. I say fuck'em.
They are the baseball cards of the jewelery world.
CherryCoke said:
Come on.
We all know God put those diamonds there to test us.
Just like he did with dinosaur bones.
I agree. Those diamonds can't possibly be more than 5000 years old or so. Buncha frickin' liars them satantists are.
Cool article. Whoda thought. Seriously, I wonder if there's going to be a report coming out that the dating was wrong. I wouldn't be surprised at all, because up to this point EVERYTHING we know says that those rocks can't be THAT old. I mean, the oldest moon rocks are what? 3.5 billion years old or something like that (not that we'd know, because we've never been to the moon either)? Crazy shit man, crazy shit. Yesterday scientists announced that they've spotted water vapor around a young star system (in the age that planets start forming), which also upsets everything we know about planet formation - we think that water was delivered here by comets and the like, but what if it was just here at formation? Wierd. Keep the geek!
There is, of course, a slim possibility that said diamonds weren't formed on Earth, but could instead be leftovers from a chunk of space-rock; it's not like the early solar system was short of such things and since we're all made from the leftovers of a supernova anyhow (any element above iron on the periodic table is only formed in any significant amounts during a supernova, therefore since we have stuff like gold and uranium we're all, as Moby rather cheesily put it, made of stars) there's a possibility they could be extraterrestrial (should that be one word or two?).
What interests me even more than ancient diamonds that may or may not be from space is quite how the hell they dated them. Carbon dating only works when you've got C14 getting formed in the upper atmosphere and being absorbed as CO2 during photosynthesis. For that matter, where the hell did this carbon come from if not from space? Diamonds are normally the end-result of squashing a bunch of trees through the stage where they're coal, till you get diamond right? If we're talking about very very early earth then there just wasn't the flora around, unless it's not just geological history but biological history that's in need of revision in light of these findings.
Actually, given all this I'm leaning toward the "God's testing us, the big prankster" argument
CherryCoke said:
Come on.
We all know God put those diamonds there to test us.
Just like he did with dinosaur bones.
Jesus buried those dinosaur bones. Get it right next time.
Actually, according tot he Chick tracts, it was satan, so how about YOU get it right!
And say what you will about the Jurassic Park series, but number 3 was good clean fun, no philosophy for literary rejects and no Jeff Goldblum saw to that...it was like watching a good old classic dinosaur picture like your grandpa used to watch.
As far as diamonds go, I'd like to know when the future prophesied by Dr. Claw will come true, I want my diamond CPU!
_DictionaryGirl_
NEWSWIRE
San Diego, CA
AUG 30, 2007 06:14 AM