By now, bitching about the current remake trend in the film industry is like mocking President Bush: it may feel good, but it's, like, so five years ago. Still, indulge your humble Geek Editrix:
Keanu fucking Reeves, the man partially responsible for what may be the worst text-to-film adaptation in the history of science fiction, Johnny Mnemonic, is set to murder another SF classic. 20th Century Fox is "re-imagining" The Day the Earth Stood Still, the Cold War-era tale of an alien come to admonish a warlike Earth, with Theodore Logan as Klaatu.
Most heinous, to borrow a phrase.
I know we're supposed to consider the Matrix cycle as some sort of redemptive crucificative act (I, for one, was not too impressed with the series, but I am kind of an asshole about, well, everything), but can't Science Fiction personified (I like to imagine Ursula K. Le Guin in a toga for this) serve him with a restraining order against the genre?
Klaatu barada nikt-whoa.
Still, I suppose there is something in the stilted, spacey acting of Keanu that suggests extraterrestrial origins, and he does kind of look like something David Icke dreamed up on a three-day bender. The best we can hope for is that Fox keeps to the original storyline. The progressive, pacifist themes of The Day... might be muddled if Klaatu, clad in a black trenchcoat, started dodging bullets aided by some sort of space kung-fu.
Costas Efthimiou, a physicist at the University of Central Florida, says that movie scenes blatantly in violation of the laws of physics have "a dumbing effect on viewers" and contribute to a "culture that fears science." In protest, he has decided to teach a course examining science in cinema. The worst offender? Efthimiou calls out the 2003 film, The Core, which is fucking awesome. Seriously, y'all. "Unobtanium." You can't make this shit up.
In response:
Bob Jones, an associate professor of film at UCF, responded to Efthimiou's concerns in a short e-mail: "These are fiction films. Not documentaries. Tell these guys to get a life."
Thanks, Bob. Yeah, nerds! Get a life!
Flux likes to get hammered and laugh at movies with improbable physics. Sometimes in just her underpants!
2
zarth
Seattle, WA
December 2004
AUG 28, 2007 12:09 PM
Flux said:
. . . but can't Science Fiction personified (I like to imagine Ursula K. Le Guin in a toga for this) serve him with a restraining order against the genre?
Excellent.
Honestly, I might have liked to see an updated version of the film (basically just with a cooler Gort - like, one that moved occasionally), but I can't imagine Keanu Reeves being the right man for the task.
Flux said:
but can't Science Fiction personified (I like to imagine Ursula K. Le Guin in a toga for this) serve him with a restraining order against the genre?
I agree that his spaced-out, aloofness, the only thing he really does, could serve him well here. In certain roles he does manage to somehow pull it off. Sometimes.
Keanu Reeves has to be stopped; that's all there is to it. I'm only mildly annoyed by the idea of remakes, no deathly opposed to it, but this crosses a line....
I know we're supposed to consider the Matrix cycle as some sort of redemptive crucificative act
I must have missed that memo, since "Reloaded" and "Revolutions" were so shitty. Every other scene was an attempt at being super-emotional (contrary to the first movie), despite the fact that the actors were playing it deadpan (in line with the first movie). The only other time I cringed as much in a theater was when Kiera Knightley tried to make a rousing speech in "At World's End."
I know I'm generalizing here, but on a whole, "Matrix" fans are the fucking worst. A friend of mine made the unpardonable sin of saying he didn't like the movie, because (his words) "it's a dumb movie pretending to be smart." He said in a room full of "Matrix" fans, who proceeded to insult his intelligence and say he didn't "understand" the movie. I like the first one, but most of the philosphy mumbo-jumbo that was in it was seen elsewhere, but it's treated as if it's ground-breaking. In short, it was a dumb action movie, but with intelligent window dressing.
Efthimiou calls out the 2003 film, The Core, which is fucking awesome.
The guys at the INSULTINGLY STUPID MOVIE PHYSICS site called that one years ago. It was so bad they had to give up analyzing it half way through.
But the worst thing about it.... It was written by man named John Rogers. This is the same bastard responsible for Catwoman and for fucking up Transformers. And he has a degree in physics!
Forget about Reeves. Somebody needs to keep that guy away from the science-fiction genre!
Science-Fiction is no more written for scientists, that ghost stories are written for ghosts.
Still, I suppose there is something in the stilted, spacey acting of Keanu that suggests extraterrestrial origins, and he does kind of look like something David Icke dreamed up on a three-day bender.
Okay, that was funny (sort of)...
Costas Efthimiou, a physicist at the University of Central Florida, says that movie scenes blatantly in violation of the laws of physics have "a dumbing effect on viewers" and contribute to a "culture that fears science."
Hmmm, interesting point (if over-intellectualized, maybe). But on a purely aesthetic level, I've found that the type of flashy CGI acrobatic effects of movies like The Matrix seem to my eye to be tawdry and vapid, in the same way laptop digital electronic music can be. There's just a brittle, hollow quality to the imagery (or sound). Give me the good old-fashioned trick photography and live animation of vintage Ray Harryhausen monster movies or George Melies silent shorts or early Hong Kong martial arts flicks over today's spiffy high-tech sci-fi/horror/fantasy cinema anyday...
One amusing thing....if I recall Michael Reinie (or however you spell his name) was chosen specifically because he was an unknown in the US and would add to the whole being an alien idea. Why couldn't they stick with that theory and get some new person that none of us know?
NoPantsDave said:
One amusing thing....if I recall Michael Reinie (or however you spell his name) was chosen specifically because he was an unknown in the US and would add to the whole being an alien idea. Why couldn't they stick with that theory and get some new person that none of us know?
You know, "Keanu Reeves was ill the Day The Earth Stood Still" so doesn't have the same zing to it.
I still think the upcoming Escape From New York remake is an even worse idea, since while the concept of an alien dude (and to digress, they so should have gotten David Bowie instead of Keanu, which is I think now the official casting rule for all Keanu Reeves movies) coming down from outer space to bring about world peace with the help of his pet robot still has some appeal in today's world, Manhattan isn't even fucking scary anymore, in the slightest.
And since Donald Pleasance is dead, I doubt they'll get a guy with a British accent (Ian McKellan? Bob Hoskins?) to play the President of the United States in the remake.
Dammit. Out of all the bad science fiction movies of that era, they had to choose one of the few actually good ones?
Cant they "ruin" Voyage to the Planet of Prehistoric Women instead?
Keanu can play the leader of the blond viking women of Venus.
Costas Efthimiou, a physicist at the University of Central Florida, says that movie scenes blatantly in violation of the laws of physics have "a dumbing effect on viewers" and contribute to a "culture that fears science." In protest, he has decided to teach a course examining science in cinema.
I've heard about this idea before, but I mean honestly- I don't know why people can be so f*cking stupid sometimes, but I'm pretty sure this in not the path wherein we may find those answers.
I had Costas For Freshman Year physics at UCF..this guy is the worst professor on the face of the earth, if you can get past the horrible Greek Accent, lets give this guy a few english lessons and maybe a free SG account and im sure he'll re think his free time
Flux
SUICIDEGIRL
Georgia, USA
AUG 28, 2007 12:01 PM