Given that it's on the banks of the Mississippi, im going to make an almost completely unfounded guess and say that there were issues with the base the bridge was rooted in.
I bet there is a really smart engineer running around somewhere screaming "I TOLD you this was going to happen!"
Given that it's on the banks of the Mississippi, im going to make an almost completely unfounded guess and say that there were issues with the base the bridge was rooted in.
I bet there is a really smart engineer running around somewhere screaming "I TOLD you this was going to happen!"
The last time that happened, a volcano erupted in LA.
In all seriousness, the foundation could be it. Looking at the second picture from the bottom, I'm curious if it was the span on the north side there that collapsed and pulled the supports back, severing the span over the water, or if it was vice-versa.
billybillybilly said:
Crazy stuff. Thankfully I don't know or at least haven't talked to anyone on the bridge. Biggest thing that's happened to us since Prince.
Given that it's on the banks of the Mississippi, im going to make an almost completely unfounded guess and say that there were issues with the base the bridge was rooted in.
I bet there is a really smart engineer running around somewhere screaming "I TOLD you this was going to happen!"
Actually, an anchor on Fox asked that question of some engineer guy they had on. He said that wasn't it; I think his theory was "fatigue fractures" or something--stress cracks over time. At any rate, that guy said that it had nothing to do with the stability of the banks of the river themselves (and from what I've seen, the photos seem to show the supports on at least one side of the river still standing, with the bridge itself draped over it).
billybillybilly said:
Crazy stuff. Thankfully I don't know or at least haven't talked to anyone on the bridge. Biggest thing that's happened to us since Prince.
are you saying assless pant did it in cube?
All I'm saying is I'm not ruling out the possibility.
Given that it's on the banks of the Mississippi, im going to make an almost completely unfounded guess and say that there were issues with the base the bridge was rooted in.
I bet there is a really smart engineer running around somewhere screaming "I TOLD you this was going to happen!"
Actually, an anchor on Fox asked that question of some engineer guy they had on. He said that wasn't it; I think his theory was "fatigue fractures" or something--stress cracks over time. At any rate, that guy said that it had nothing to do with the stability of the banks of the river themselves (and from what I've seen, the photos seem to show the supports on at least one side of the river still standing, with the bridge itself draped over it).
Actually, it didn't have any supports in the river.
The bridge was built in 1967 and is 1,900 feet long. The bridge hangs 64 feet above the Missisippi River.
It was designed to span the river without any supports in the river.
The goal was to avoid having the big cement piers in the water which would get in the way of river traffic.
That means the bridge spans 458 feet between supports.
billybillybilly said:
Crazy stuff. Thankfully I don't know or at least haven't talked to anyone on the bridge. Biggest thing that's happened to us since Prince.
I wouldn't be so sure of that. When Johan Santana leaves the Twins, fans will be in droves falling into the river because they were trying to jump off a bridge that no longer is there.
Bush is already denying any resposibility blaming it all on the state. However since this is an INTERSTATE TOLL-FREE HIGHWAY which depends at least in part on FEDERAL funds and since BUSH has cut these same funds..........................................
"The White House said Thursday that an inspection two years ago found structural deficiencies in the highway bridge that buckled during evening rush hour in Minneapolis.
White House press secretary Tony Snow said the Interstate 35W span rated 50 on a scale of 120 for structural stability.
"This doesn't mean there was a risk of failure, but if an inspection report identifies deficiencies, the state is responsible for taking corrective actions," he said. The bridge was 40 years old."
Colinism
Atlanta, GA
July 2005
AUG 01, 2007 04:54 PM