Bringing Democracy to Iraq has been a difficult task. As much as we want the country to follow in our footsteps, it seems it may never happen. At the very least, we can lead by example and show the Iraqis what made America so successful during our early years: Slavery. And what better time and place to introduce the glory of slavery than during the construction of the US Embassy in Baghdad?
Yesterday, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held hearings on the waste, fraud and abuse that occurred during construction of our new, $600 million, kick-ass Embassy.
Two American civilian contractors who worked on a massive U.S. Embassy construction project in Baghdad told Congress yesterday that foreign laborers were deceptively recruited and trafficked to Iraq to toil at the site, where they experienced physical abuse and substandard working conditions.
It just warms the heart to hear that human beings were...
"Kidnapped by First Kuwaiti to work on the U.S. Embassy." Their passports had been confiscated, and they were driven away on buses after landing in Baghdad, then were "smuggled into the Green Zone.
First Kuwaiti is a contracting firm that was handed the job because no American company could meet the terms. We can only assume the terms meant they needed to kidnap slaves. Most of the slaves were from India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, the Philippines and Sierra Leone, which means they could have easily called mom or dad and asked for money for a ticket home. But they didnt because they were lazy and First Kuwaiti had taken their passports.
At least they were treated well when they got there.
Foreign workers lived in tightly packed trailers and had "insufficient equipment and basic needs -- stuff like shoes and gloves," Owens said.
Only the weak need shoes. I think Jesus said that.
The right-wing excuse machine will surely say that it is not the United States' fault because it was a contracted, foreign company that built our Embassy with slaves. I think the appropriate response to that is, Eat my balls. It was the State Departments job to oversee the construction of the US Embassy because its a fucking US Embassy. They actually have a division that oversees the construction of Embassies, called the State Department's Overseas Buildings Operations. If you dont think we watch the construction of an Embassy closely, you are an idiot.
The best thing about slaves is that they do quality work. We only know about one building on the compound and its a useless pile of shit.
In May, the new $22 million dollar Embassy guard base opened. Workers quickly realized the kitchen was a disaster. Appliances did not work, staff were receiving electrical shocks and then the wiring actually began to melt. It was estimated that the electrical problems would take two weeks to fix, but in that time it became apparent the base was a disaster.
The wiring in the dining hall was in such bad shape that officials decided to send all the guards back to their old base. They were concerned that the same wiring was prevalent throughout the guard base and they didnt want the guards to die in a fire.
Every generator on the base developed leaks.
The fuel tanks were installed without corrosion protection or leak detectors, and fuel had begun to saturate the soil around the tanks. Teflon tape designed for water pipes had been used on the fuel tanks, and that such tape "will dissolve on contact with diesel fuel."
The residential trailers filled with formaldehyde fumes. Thankfully, there was a simple solution.
The trailer manufacturer, a Saudi company called Red Sea Housing Services Co., confirmed to the embassy it had used the toxic chemical in preparing the housing. Red Sea told the embassy to keep the windows open and use charcoal in the rooms to absorb the odor.
Strangely, the open the windows/charcoal fix did not work and the trailers continued to reek of toxic fumes. Since this is the only building on the $600 million dollar Embassy that we know about, the assumption is that the problems exist throughout the compound.
The State Department's Overseas Buildings Operations has kept a "close hold" on the project, making it difficult for anyone else in the government to gauge progress. "We are suspecting we will find the same issues in the new embassy," resulting in months of delays, the official said.
No shit. Who would have thought that no bid contracts and slave labor would lead to poor quality?
Hey...wait a minute...I thought we were liberators...I thought we were turning over leadership of Iraq to, well, the Iraqi people. Why would we need the largest US embassy in the entire world (10 times over) in a country that we are not occupying? And why would the US need slave labor from other countries? We've never done that before or anything in the 19th century, or before that. Hmm. Why wouldn't the Iraqis LOVE to have jobs building a permanent panopticon-like fortress where their American corporatist overlords could watch over them? Ingrates. Maybe we're still looking for those WMD's or something...Fox News says they may STILL find them and they are fair and balanced.
I just don't get it...unless, of course, the whole war is A TOTAL FARCE. A RUSE. But Jesuschief George would never do that, so I just don't get it...wonder what the Democratic "opposition" in congress will not do next? At least we can blame the slaves, I mean kidnapped "immigrants" looking for opportunity to serve empire.
We're more and more like Bizarro world every day...
If this isn't symbolic of the progress we've made in Iraq as a whole, I don't know what is.
Everyone (read: the President and his administration [read: entourage]) keeps touting our progress in Iraq as amazing, world changing, and on track. And it might look that way, to the casual, uninformed onlooker. But as soon as we have to actually get something done, we move in and it all falls apart. And there are a lot of people who think the project was doomed and misguided in the first place.
By the way, building a $600 million embassy in a country that we just wanted to fix and then get out of is sending a mixed signal, don't you think?
The relationship between First Kuwait and Haliiburton is an interesting one, especially when you consider the fact that Halliburton is now locating its international headquarters in Dubai. First Kuwait's entire busines is built around its role as a subcontractor for Halliburton. I wouldn't bat an eyelash of surprise if it came out that Halliburton is getting its palm greased by First Kuwait over this contract. Also a great way for a U.S. Corp. to use slave labor through a back channel sub-contractor. Any whining about the contract going to a foreign company is probably just a diversion. It smells bad because it is bad. Makes me wanna puke.
IDGAS said:
Slave labor = low cost = less taxes = happy people
QED
Slave labor = happy people
So STFU and be happy [s]slaves[/s] people
Slave labor=clearly higher status of paid contractors=more money in their pockets versus those dirty brown people's filthy paws=a healthier domestic economy for a happier and safer america?
I was going to link human trafficking and dog fighting into there somewhere but couldn't find the proper wikipedia articles.
So glad to see tyranny hard at work keeping the world safe for American Supeiority. I mean democracy...I totally said democracy.
And from what I understand, the UAE cares even less about the use of slave labor than we do.
Though, interestingly enough, these workers would rather be in Dubai than Baghdad.
First Kuwaiti's labor practices are already under investigation by the Justice Department amid allegations that foreign employees were brought into Iraq under false pretenses -- such as being told that they were to work in Dubai -- and then forbidden to leave because the company had confiscated their passports.
You know things are pretty bad if slave laborers would rather slave for the UAE than for the U.S.A.
FearTheReaper
NEWSWIRE
I'm lost
JUL 27, 2007 02:12 AM