Huge Pussy Talk Good

It said when you have prepared talking points for "You're a coward."

He looks like a kid dressed up in his daddy's suit and tie.

I wonder how old he is.

You know, I didn't listen to any of the audio. I don't like him simply because his facial expressions make him seem like a pompous shit-head.

Yeah, it's the same thing if you listen.

That was (obviously) my favorite part. It's unconstitutional to use your constitutional rights to challenge other people's opinions by suggesting they sack up and defend them!

He's that kid who sat front and center in the 300 person history lecture and never shut the fuck up.

We all knew him.

*cough*

While this *was* awesome, I liked the part where he argued for a good, rational discussion about the war. Just like the rational, fact-based debate we had about *getting into* the war, ya know?

Law school is also unconstitutional.

times sure have changed havent they

Yeah, it's funny how that happens over the course of a decade. It's also really funny that people like you think that a bunch of Democrats who believed what turned out to be abject lies on the part of the administration are evidence for anything other than impeachment.

i know clinton lied that why he was impeached

lol,

I'm not even gonna respond. I'm going to make popcorn.

What happened to "I'm gonna stop digging a hole?"

I am on solid ground with this thread. Do you think Bush when he was the Governor of Texas told President Clinton to lie about WMD so when he became president he could go to war or did he sneak into CIA headquarters and plant the intel. Do you dispute the fact that the whole world thought Saddam had WMD.

You know, I'm sure there's a recruiting office in Scottsdale.

Ummm, at the end of 2002 the whole world thought Hussein had WMDs because the Bush administration insisted that we had conclusive evidence that we did. They lied.

What we believed almost five years before, especially given that your claims are beyond exaggerated, is a bit irrelevant.

The fact is that Iraq had no WMDs, were no threat to the US and we are now four and a half years into an unwinnable asymmetrical war. Good job.

scary fact: they already gave this guy a gun.

Seem anything that comes out of you is wrong. It's just your nature.

And you are not on solid ground with this thread, because this thread is about pussies who are of fighting age, how talk the talk but are too cowardly to join up and fight.

You are talking about the reasons for the war, which everyone knows at this point was a load of shit. Sorry, almost everyone. There is apparently a guy in Scottsdale...

I hate to use Wiki to make what you're talking about even more wrong, but it is convenient.

Note that Iraq did at one point have WMDs, Clinton was not lying in 1998.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

Since, you do seem to have some bias when reading, I'll explain a little more of the article to you.

The UN managed to locate and destroy the WMDs, and the "crisis" was over when inspectors left in 1998.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Between_the_Inspections:_1998-2002

Of course, running up to the war, what do we have?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Runup_to_the_2003_Iraq_War

Now, there are various theories as to why Saddam was a bastard when it got round to complying with inspections, but the reality is, there weren't any WMDs.

There wasn't any evidence that he had any outside of the right wing nuts deliberately lying to you and everyone else.

The whole world did not think that Iraq was stockpiling WMDs, unless you've forgotten that the majority of the UN was opposed to this "war". They did support continuing inspections to make sure no more weapons were being developed, but did not seriously believe Iraq was a current threat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_UN_Security_Council_and_the_Iraq_war#Positions_of_Security_Council_members