NYT prudes attack Thompson

Well, the prudes at the New York Times have now warned us of the evils of securing a sexually attractive partner in life:

Will her face determine his fortune?

Here's the money quote:

But what they don't tell you is that his wife is 40 years old. Granted, she's a very attractive 40 years old, but I would hardly claim that a 40 year old woman is a "trophy wife."

Also, what the fuck does this have to do with his politics?

Personally I feel that having an attractive sexual partner is positive indicator of a person's successes not a negative one.

There are several reasons to dislike Fred Thompson. His wife is not one of them...or at least should not be.

Didn't actually read it, did you?

Especially not where the deragatory comments were coming from other Republicans...

There are also positive coments from other people, too. Overall, it is a serious article addressing a serious issue.... and, as usual, you distort and misrepresent the story.

Way to be predictable, Lou!

It lives!

And reappears to do the only thing it seems to be good at!

They do show their EXTREME LIBERAL BIAS by not including any discussion about the red-hot controversy over Democrat Dennis Kucinich's wife.


Well hello there.

Personally, I don't find anything wrong with it. It's a classic love story: Mannequin meets scarecrow, mannequin falls in love with scarecrow, mannequin and scarecrow eat villagers' souls...

Yeah really, everybody knows you find the most serious journalism and analysis in the FASHION AND STYLE section.

ha ha !

Frankly, that's just as dumb as what you're alleging the New York Times was positing.

As President, I promise to make Necia wear as low-cut blouses as humanly possible to all of her appearances. For if one man goes without cleavage, the nation goes without cleavage.

Well, in that case, there is absolutely no question that I'm going for Hillary in 2008.

Here.

And she'll thank you for her support.

[/badoom crash!]

Damn the NY Times for reporting on what Republicans are arguing about!

Psh! No. Jeez.

Not that creepy little dude. Eww.

That will never play in Peoria.

I think the First Lady's titties need a bit more support than that.

Plus, OMG! The pasties are $70 on their own? That would undoubtedly reflect badly on the administration.

It would be worse than Condi hitting up Ferragamo whenever it was that she was hitting up Ferragamo and got everyone all in a tizzy over it.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

God, I love Agent Provocateur.

I should think you'd have no shortage of supporters volunteering to do just that.

I know, but some dude in a suit following me around holding up my boobs might detract from the outfit, you know?

You're so selfish. I'm pretty sure there's more than enough to go around, anyway. And from what I hear I doubt they'd fit in your portfolio.

I should think that would depend on the suit. It could be accessorized accordingly.

That a successful politician has a wife 25 years younger than he is a "serious issue"

ROTFLOL

Get a grip prude.

We're talking tits now, jerk.

Way to spoil the fun.

Have we taken it off ignore? You know what that will lead to. Pharmacists and lunch counters and polished bridges and Marxists and slavery and how school integration was a bad thing.

Are you sure you to want go back to that?