Officers carried out a controlled explosion after reports of a suspicious vehicle parked in Haymarket shortly before 0200 BST (0100 GMT).
According to some witnesses, the light metallic green Mercedes saloon was driven erratically and crashed into bins near a nightclub. The driver was then seen running away.
During an initial investigation of the vehicle, officers found a potentially viable device. It was made safe three hours later.
Police are now frantically searching landmark sites across the capital for further explosive devices. They were not sure whether the bomb was a lone device or one of several deployed across London.
I don't think that it's as simple as 'In light of last week's bombing, we're going to give you all I.D. cards and start monitoring your thoughts and put telescreens in your homes'.
I know that clumsy legistlation to try and help Governement agencies combat terrorism take a worryingly cavailleer attitude towards civil liberties, but I think you're over-simplifying the issue somewhat.
You're also pre-empting an issue that has yet to show it's significance in this particular case. I think more worrying is the attempted car-bombing that happened earlier.
Glassmachine said:
I don't think that it's as simple as 'In light of last week's bombing, we're going to give you all I.D. cards and start monitoring your thoughts and put telescreens in your homes'.
I know that clumsy legistlation to try and help Governement agencies combat terrorism take a worryingly cavailleer attitude towards civil liberties, but I think you're over-simplifying the issue somewhat.
You're also pre-empting an issue that has yet to show it's significance in this particular case. I think more worrying is the attempted car-bombing that happened earlier.
Glassmachine said:
I'm not totally convinced it's as simple as that.
So nothing to do with deranged terrorists trying to kill a bunch of people at a nightclub?
Of course not. When in doubt blame our society.
Let's hope none of the civil liberties eroding cctv cams picked him up - he might get arrested and that would totally curtail his freedom to express his beliefs through the medium of explosions.
Glassmachine said:
I'm not totally convinced it's as simple as that.
So nothing to do with deranged terrorists trying to kill a bunch of people at a nightclub?
Of course not. When in doubt blame our society.
Let's hope none of the civil liberties eroding cctv cams picked him up - he might get arrested and that would totally curtail his freedom to express his beliefs through the medium of explosions.
I think you may have got the wrong end of the stick there.
Glassmachine said:
I don't think that it's as simple as 'In light of last week's bombing, we're going to give you all I.D. cards and start monitoring your thoughts and put telescreens in your homes'.
I know that clumsy legistlation to try and help Governement agencies combat terrorism take a worryingly cavailleer attitude towards civil liberties, but I think you're over-simplifying the issue somewhat.
You're also pre-empting an issue that has yet to show it's significance in this particular case. I think more worrying is the attempted car-bombing that happened earlier.
how far would you let the government go (any government) to make sure you didn't have to be worried again?
At what time do we go, actually I know I might get blown to shit, but we need to keep some sense of freedom in our liveas
Does anyone else think the news coverage of this story has been excessive? It's an interesting story that deserves alot of coverage, but there has been pretty much no other news shown in Britain all day.
It's more relevant how we've just had a new cabinet put in place (not the kind from Ikea), and flooding has turned Sheffield into Atlantis, and yet it's 'Sound the bells of England! A car in Fleet Street hasn't exploded!'.
It would be different if this was significant threat, or if something had actually exploded, but I live in London and I don't know anyone who's the least bit worried.
Glassmachine said:
I don't think that it's as simple as 'In light of last week's bombing, we're going to give you all I.D. cards and start monitoring your thoughts and put telescreens in your homes'.
I know that clumsy legistlation to try and help Governement agencies combat terrorism take a worryingly cavailleer attitude towards civil liberties, but I think you're over-simplifying the issue somewhat.
You're also pre-empting an issue that has yet to show it's significance in this particular case. I think more worrying is the attempted car-bombing that happened earlier.
how far would you let the government go (any government) to make sure you didn't have to be worried again?
At what time do we go, actually I know I might get blown to shit, but we need to keep some sense of freedom in our liveas
Dude. You're preaching to the choir. And you're not listening, either.
Jenni said:
Does anyone else think the news coverage of this story has been excessive? It's an interesting story that deserves alot of coverage, but there has been pretty much no other news shown in Britain all day.
It's more relevant how we've just had a new cabinet put in place (not the kind from Ikea), and flooding has turned Sheffield into Atlantis, and yet it's 'Sound the bells of England! A car in Fleet Street hasn't exploded!'.
It would be different if this was significant threat, or if something had actually exploded, but I live in London and I don't know anyone who's the least bit worried.
I think technically it's three incidents so far (Haymarket, Park Lane and Fleet Street).
Still, I just can't bring myself to be overly worried about this. Maybe I'm just not terrified enough of the Evildoers, but it was supposed to be a very amateurish operation that didn't even use real explosives. It sucks, and certainly should be reported, but I literally haven't managed to see any other news on television, which is irritating. Especially as there isn't even that much to report on it at this stage.
I think the significance for those living in London is pretty huge - the only difference if they had've gone off would be the added tragedy. The fact that someone intended to do this and got this far remains the most important thing. If this wasn't the first time it had happened then I'd see your point, but nah... this is pretty worrying.
Television news is always going to have a 'lead' story and I admit it can get annoying. That's why I read the Internet more. But being annoyed about there being too much coverage on this? I dunno, it's pretty darn significant. Be annoyed about Paris Hilton in the news, be annoyed about selective reporting of violent crimes to perpetuate negative stereotypes about certain areas and certain groups. This? No.
Glassmachine said:
I think the significance for those living in London is pretty huge
As a London dweller, er ... I'm not convinced.
Television news is always going to have a 'lead' story and I admit it can get annoying. That's why I read the Internet more. But being annoyed about there being too much coverage on this? I dunno, it's pretty darn significant.
I wouldn't mind if it was just a 'lead' story, but it's the only story.
Glassmachine said:
I think the significance for those living in London is pretty huge
As a London dweller, er ... I'm not convinced.
Dude, what more do you want? Someone tried to blow up a car bomb outside of Tiger Tiger. That's pretty extreme. Are you not a little bit bothered that this shows that things like that are possible? Does it not strike you as a bit of a let-off that hundreds of clubbers weren't reduced to lumps of charred meat?
As someone who lives and will soon be working in central London - Well I'm not pissing my pants in terror. But I think it's quite an important development.
Are you saying that if the bombs on the 7th of July hadn't gone off, you wouldn't want to hear about it?
Glassmachine said:
I think the significance for those living in London is pretty huge
As a London dweller, er ... I'm not convinced.
Dude, what more do you want? Someone tried to blow up a car bomb outside of Tiger Tiger. That's pretty extreme. Are you not a little bit bothered that this shows that things like that are possible?
the IRA have already proved its possible as did July 7th and 21st I think thats part of the reason a lot of Londoners are a bit *shrug shoulders* about it, as its happened before and will probably happen again.
The opinion is, its not going to happen to me so why worry about it
Glassmachine said:
Are you saying that if the bombs on the 7th of July hadn't gone off, you wouldn't want to hear about it?
If they hadn't gone off, and there was nothing the journalists could find to say about the story other than 'backpack didn't explode', I'd want to hear about it - but I'd like a bit of other news mixed in, not just the same thing being said over and over 24 hours a day without a single break.
rabidrabbit said:
the IRA have already proved its possible as did July 7th and 21st I think thats part of the reason a lot of Londoners are a bit *shrug shoulders* about it, as its happened before and will probably happen again.
The opinion is, its not going to happen to me so why worry about it
Well I suppose that is quite a reasoned and thoughtful approach.
I suppose those things that don't directly affect me are pretty unimportant. I'm off to cancel my standing order to Oxfam now.
Jenni said:
I'd want to hear about it - but I'd like a bit of other news mixed in, not just the same thing being said over and over 24 hours a day without a single break.
And Sky News. Know you of any other good British news television channel? Apart from ITV, just because ... no.
Ugh IT-fucking-V. No, I was just suggesting that if you'd rather not hear the same story over and over again a carousel news service might be something to avoid. Just tune in at 7 for John Snow and his side kick Krishnan Guru-Murty and the awesome Channel 4 programme. Mmmm liberal bias..
Glassmachine
United Kingdom
November 2004
JUN 29, 2007 03:26 AM