Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55

 ... 441

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Bitch_PhD

Bitch_PhD

I'm lost
February 2007

JUN 13, 2007 12:08 PM





If only politicians would practice what they preach:

The House Appropriations Committee subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services and Education shocked many progressives in early June when it approved a $32 million increase for the discredited Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) program.

....

This apparent change of heart from the Democrats on abstinence-only education is an attempt to build a veto-proof majority for Labor-H. According to the June 7 Congressional Quarterly Today, President Bush has vowed to veto any Labor-H (Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education) bill that exceeds the amount that he set aside in his budget. Bush put forward a $698 billion budget. The Labor-H markup exceeds that figure by more than $10 billion. So Democrats must attract enough votes to pass the bill with a veto-proof majority if they are to prevail.



The Dems want to pass the bill because, as the second largest discretionary spending bill (behind defense), it contains money for things like Medicare, the National Institutes of Health and Center for Disease Control, job training programs, unemployment benefits, Head Start, Global HIV/AIDS funding, k-12 school counselors, Pell Grants, Public Broadcasting, and Social Security. (You can download a .pdf of the subcommittee's proposed spending markups here.)



There are two problems with this approach (assuming it works). First, absintence "education" requires that kids be taught

the social, psychological, and health gains to be realized by abstaining from sexual activity

--whether or not such gains actually exist. So abstinence programs "teach" stuff like, absintence until marriage makes marriages last longer (not true) and improves self-esteem (not true). Stuff like birth control's only addressed in terms of failure rates, and

presented only as it supports the abstinence message being presented.

Moreover, studies have found that abstinence education

    Doesn't work: kids who get absintence training are as likely as anyone else to fuck around before marriage.

    Contain "significant errors or distortions" of fact.

    Blur the line between science and religion.

    Promote gender stereotypes as fact.

    Effectively deny sex education to gay and lesbian students, since gay marriage is illegal.



What's worse, though, is that the people who have the most to gain from that extra $32 million are . . . the political/religious right, who are just going to funnel that money right back into the pockets of politicians who, if the intended compromise here succeeds, care more about lying to kids about sex than they do about things like properly funding proven education, health, and human services programs.



And round and round it goes.



Of course, the truth is that just like teenagers, telling politicians to just say no won't work, because that's not how the world works. People are going to have sex, and politicians are going to make unsavory compromises. Still, you can't help but wish that the shitheads of the world would fuck over someone other than kids.



Bitch_PhD really could have gone her whole life without doing that Google Image search, thereby learning that chastity belts are a kind of modern fetish gear.



Cross-posted, more or less, over at Bitch PhD.

Skywisdom

Skywisdom

Portland, OR
December 2005

JUN 13, 2007 05:51 PM

I'm gonna go have pre-martial sex to protest this.
Who is with me??
Eh?

CherryCoke

CherryCoke

Derry, NH
May 2007

JUN 13, 2007 05:54 PM

Skywisdom said:
I'm gonna go have pre-martial sex to protest this.
Who is with me??
Eh?



I'm ten steps ahead of you. biggrin

geo35

geo35

Minneapolis, MN
January 2003

JUN 13, 2007 05:54 PM

It never fails to fascinate me that anyone could actually try to make an argument against THE most natural thing in the world.

Gillionaire

Gillionaire

Manchester, NH
February 2007

JUN 13, 2007 06:03 PM

It saddens me when good, healthy, helpful information about sex is totally thrown out in favor of "NO NEVER HAVE IT EVER" bullshit. Teenagers want to have sex, it's only natural growing up as a part of humanity. The only thing abstinence only education does is deny them the information they need to know in order to protect themselves and their health.

How many times does it have to fail miserably before people get the hint?

briannalee39

briannalee39

Stoughton, WI
June 2007

JUN 13, 2007 06:22 PM

I stayed a virgin til 17 1/2 and I probably am happier and have more self esteem now than ever. I've still only had sex with that one guy, but damn I feel sexy and proud of who I am as a woman.

sexybeast

sexybeast

Metairie, LA
July 2004

JUN 13, 2007 06:22 PM

Skywisdom said:
I'm gonna go have pre-martial sex to protest this.
Who is with me??
Eh?



Alright, let's do it... Actually, I'm married, so I don't know if it'll count, but I'll still have sex with you!


Abstinence only education is worse than teaching kids creationism, but for some reason people don't seem to notice as much.

redconsensus

redconsensus

Baltimore, MD
August 2004

JUN 13, 2007 06:31 PM

The consistent rejection of reason and rationality by a significant portion of Americans and American politicians never ceases to disturb and disgust me.

ninetysevencents

ninetysevencents

Rochester, NY
August 2003

JUN 13, 2007 06:31 PM

Incidentally, "Just say NO!" was the anti-drug slogan while "not me, not now" was the rally cry for the abstinence campaign.

Bitch_PhD

Bitch_PhD

I'm lost
February 2007

JUN 13, 2007 06:35 PM

Just say no is snappier, though.

SignalNoise

SignalNoise

Chicago, IL
February 2004

JUN 13, 2007 06:37 PM

While I think this is a bummer, I found it hard to muster a lot of outrage. It's like the headline should read: "Legislative process works at the way it is intended! People pissed off!" I mean, I dunno - sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, and sometimes you have to bite the bullet. And I'm willing to bet that Democrats are getting plenty of nice bang out of things like, you know, Medicare and unemployment - going over Bush's limit to do shit that needs to be done that has been neglected for far too long.

Also, I'm not clear how money for abstinence only education is being funneled directly back into electing Republicans? I mean, wouldn't the same process work for Democratic secular groups that are aided? That sounds like a funky stretch; it could be I suppose, but I guess I need it spelled out for me?

MrStitches

MrStitches

Sag Harbor, NY
November 2003

JUN 13, 2007 06:41 PM

Man, bush sure has gotten veto happy huh? I bet he gets a boner every time he makes the dems. do exactly what he wants just by threatening a veto. Good job democrats, you spineless pussies!

theconservative

theconservative

Antarctica
October 2004

JUN 13, 2007 07:05 PM


So abstinence programs "teach" stuff like, absintence until marriage makes marriages last longer (not true) and improves self-esteem (not true).

can you back that up?

RedVillain

RedVillain

Long Beach, CA
September 2005

JUN 13, 2007 08:11 PM

"Bitch_PhD really could have gone her whole life without doing that Google Image search, thereby learning that chastity belts are a kind of modern fetish gear."

HA HA HA

skeptik

skeptik

New Orleans, LA
February 2004

JUN 13, 2007 08:44 PM

theconservative said:

So abstinence programs "teach" stuff like, absintence until marriage makes marriages last longer (not true) and improves self-esteem (not true).

can you back that up?



Can they?

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

JUN 13, 2007 08:48 PM

theconservative said:

So abstinence programs "teach" stuff like, absintence until marriage makes marriages last longer (not true) and improves self-esteem (not true).

can you back that up?



This is what you focus on? Study after study after study shows that abstinence programs do nothing to change kids approach to having sex and increase risk by not offering information about methods to prevent STDs and you are out to prove that the claims about fidelity in marriage and self esteem are true?

Vanceowen

Vanceowen

Thousand Oaks, CA
September 2006

JUN 13, 2007 09:17 PM

I was one of those underinformed kids. Hell, I never had health class (my parents are nuttier than the govt.). Needless to say I was ill prepared for sex, but had the good fortune to meet partners who hadn't been left completely in the dark. It scares me to think how many teens are out there that are like I was.

tuba_man

tuba_man

Twentynine Palms, CA
March 2005

JUN 13, 2007 09:47 PM

I had access to all that information and was told abstinence was a good idea, but at the same time, "If you're gonna, play it safe!"

Am I the only one nerdy enough to have graduated high school before losing my virginity? Wow...I'm gonna go cry now.

luxmeaveritas

luxmeaveritas

Albuquerque, NM
December 2004

JUN 13, 2007 10:08 PM

I was never taught about contraceptives in school. Maybe in health in high school, but I think I was self-taught by that time, and then it was abstinence only.

In elementary when we had "the talk" at school, they told us only about the female reproductive system and how we were gonna bleed soon. Then they proceeded to tell us that tampons were very dangerous and to avoid them. They said if we HAD to, to use only the "junior" sized ones. It was pretty damn silly.

Hafu

Hafu

Charlottesville, VA
February 2005

JUN 14, 2007 03:20 AM

haha, i remember my dad asking me to have the talk with my littlest brother. i was self taught through asking questions with friends and the great and mighty media.

and no tuba_man. i graduated high school then a week later i lost my virginity.

yellowkid

yellowkid

Boise, ID
May 2007

JUN 14, 2007 11:40 AM

I wonder if the politician's supporting this are so delusional that they think that this works or do they think that teaching a broken program is worth having kids unknowledgable about protection. Our teen pregnancy rate is sometimes four times that of other industrialized nations.

Sigh, who wants to run away to the moon with me?

mamhth

mamhth

Placentia, CA
January 2004

JUN 14, 2007 11:45 AM

I just went on a date last night and she said "NO" frown

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

JUN 14, 2007 11:53 AM

NickFaust said:

theconservative said:

So abstinence programs "teach" stuff like, absintence until marriage makes marriages last longer (not true) and improves self-esteem (not true).

can you back that up?



This is what you focus on? Study after study after study shows that abstinence programs do nothing to change kids approach to having sex and increase risk by not offering information about methods to prevent STDs and you are out to prove that the claims about fidelity in marriage and self esteem are true?


There's also this.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)




Yes, that's right. I just cited myself as authority. Because I can.


Keri

Keri

SUICIDEGIRL

Virginia, USA

JUN 14, 2007 12:00 PM

i think that teaching abstinence only in schools is disasterous. too many people would be in the dark about their options and their own bodies. teaching safety should be the main goal- not making those who choose what they do with their own bodies feel bad about themselves for it. i was a pregnant teen, and it was only the result of not being safe. teenagers will always have sex no matter what. it's time for politicians/parents to wake up

Gillionaire

Gillionaire

Manchester, NH
February 2007

JUN 14, 2007 04:20 PM

tuba_man said:
Am I the only one nerdy enough to have graduated high school before losing my virginity? Wow...I'm gonna go cry now.



No, you're not. I'm a member of that club, too. So cry with me.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next