Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUN 09, 2007 09:18 PM



I need to warn you that this article is about a gay bomb. But don’t be scared, the gay bomb is not a bomb that will kill only gay people. That would be wrong. The gay bomb is a hormone bomb that would turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and drive them to drop their weapons and pick up their follow soldier's cocks. Sadly, the gay bomb will not happen anytime soon but military leaders did consider trying to create one in 1994.


Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed that military leaders had considered, and then subsequently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."


But now we have an idea for the greatest gay porn movie that will ever be made and we owe it all to a hippy from Berkeley. Edward Hammond used the Freedom of Information Act to get his hands on the proposal that was being kept at an Air Force laboratory in Ohio.

In 1994, the lab asked for a miniscule $7.5 million to create a bomb that would make dudes fuck and blow each other on the battlefield.


"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units breakdown because all their soldiers became irresistibly attractive to one another.”

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soldiers would become gay.”


The Department of Defense claims they quickly dismissed the plan – after they rubbed one out in the bathroom. But Hammond says the DOD mulled it over for a while.


"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."


Today military officials say there is no such bomb being developed today. But we can dream. Oh, sweet Jesus can we dream....

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:05 AM

LET'S START A WAR!

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:08 AM

Subrosa said:
LET'S START A WAR!


WITH THE GAY BOMB! GAY BOMB! GAY BOMB!

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:23 AM

i heard the rooskies have had a gay bomb for two years.

they tested it on Zarth

Kleio

Kleio

Winona, MN
January 2006

JUN 10, 2007 09:24 AM

Wait, guys, wait! They need to know if it works first, right? They'd better test it here in SD, for maximum positive results.

Untimely

Untimely

Chicago, IL
January 2007

JUN 10, 2007 09:26 AM

I guess they forget that many of the fiercest armies in history practiced homosexuality.

"It is not only the most warlike peoples, the Boeotians, Spartans, and Cretans, who are the most susceptible to this kind of love but also the greatest heroes of old: Meleager, Achilles, Aristomenes, Cimon, and Epaminondas."
--Plutarch

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:28 AM

attn_ho said:
i heard the rooskies have had a gay bomb for two years.

they tested it on Zarth



attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:28 AM

Kleio said:
Wait, guys, wait! They need to know if it works first, right? They'd better test it here in SD, for maximum positive results.



aww, you just want there to open up a

GAY BAR! GAY BAR! GAY BAR!

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:30 AM

Untimely said:
I guess they forget that many of the fiercest armies in history practiced homosexuality.



yeah, but this bomb would make them into the limp wristed hair obsessed gays, not the muscle bound gays.

Pom_felo

Pom_felo

San Antonio, TX
February 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:31 AM


"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."



Okay, that has to be a misunderstanding. There was probably some DoD guy forced to work on a proposal for non-lethal weapons who was either trying to fill out some space our just not keen weapons that leave people alive. I have to believe that.

It's either that or facing the realization that some DoD guy thought the ensuing satellite intel reports would be cheaper to him than gay porn.

Kleio

Kleio

Winona, MN
January 2006

JUN 10, 2007 09:31 AM

attn_ho said:

Kleio said:
Wait, guys, wait! They need to know if it works first, right? They'd better test it here in SD, for maximum positive results.



aww, you just want there to open up a

GAY BAR! GAY BAR! GAY BAR!



What? You don't?

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:35 AM

Kleio said:

attn_ho said:

Kleio said:
Wait, guys, wait! They need to know if it works first, right? They'd better test it here in SD, for maximum positive results.



aww, you just want there to open up a

GAY BAR! GAY BAR! GAY BAR!



What? You don't?



naw. i only go to the gay bar to score chicks.





... with dicks.

Untimely

Untimely

Chicago, IL
January 2007

JUN 10, 2007 09:38 AM

attn_ho said:

Untimely said:
I guess they forget that many of the fiercest armies in history practiced homosexuality.



yeah, but this bomb would make them into the limp wristed hair obsessed gays, not the muscle bound gays.



Or maybe they realized it might not actually make them gay, but could instead cause the enemy such severe mental anguish about their sexuality that they would actually become more aggressive, in a desperate attempt to prove themselves to be hetero?

Nobody wants to deal with a combatant who's sublimating their insecurities into bouts of random violence.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:41 AM

Untimely said:

attn_ho said:

Untimely said:
I guess they forget that many of the fiercest armies in history practiced homosexuality.


yeah, but this bomb would make them into the limp wristed hair obsessed gays, not the muscle bound gays.


Or maybe they realized it might not actually make them gay, but could instead cause the enemy such severe mental anguish about their sexuality that they would actually become more aggressive, in a desperate attempt to prove themselves to be hetero?


Maybe they were more concerned about the weapon's "blowback" potential.

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:51 AM

Zarth said:

Untimely said:

attn_ho said:

Untimely said:
I guess they forget that many of the fiercest armies in history practiced homosexuality.


yeah, but this bomb would make them into the limp wristed hair obsessed gays, not the muscle bound gays.


Or maybe they realized it might not actually make them gay, but could instead cause the enemy such severe mental anguish about their sexuality that they would actually become more aggressive, in a desperate attempt to prove themselves to be hetero?


Maybe they were more concerned about the weapon's "blowback" potential.



i wouldnt touch that comment with a ten inch dick.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:54 AM

attn_ho said:

Zarth said:

Untimely said:

attn_ho said:

Untimely said:
I guess they forget that many of the fiercest armies in history practiced homosexuality.


yeah, but this bomb would make them into the limp wristed hair obsessed gays, not the muscle bound gays.


Or maybe they realized it might not actually make them gay, but could instead cause the enemy such severe mental anguish about their sexuality that they would actually become more aggressive, in a desperate attempt to prove themselves to be hetero?


Maybe they were more concerned about the weapon's "blowback" potential.


i wouldnt touch that comment with a ten inch dick.


Oh, honey, we all know what you'd be doing with a ten-inch dick if you got ahold of one.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:54 AM

Zarth said:

Untimely said:

attn_ho said:

Untimely said:
I guess they forget that many of the fiercest armies in history practiced homosexuality.


yeah, but this bomb would make them into the limp wristed hair obsessed gays, not the muscle bound gays.


Or maybe they realized it might not actually make them gay, but could instead cause the enemy such severe mental anguish about their sexuality that they would actually become more aggressive, in a desperate attempt to prove themselves to be hetero?


Maybe they were more concerned about the weapon's "blowback" potential.



i guess it depends on how well equipped the enemy is.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUN 10, 2007 09:56 AM

See, attn_ho? That's how it's done.

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

JUN 10, 2007 09:59 AM

We should develop this. Then we'd FINALLY have a way to shut the peaceniks up when they shout "Make Love! NOT WAR!!!" By responding with, "Hey, but we're doing BOTH!!!"

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 10, 2007 10:02 AM

talk about friendly fire! heyo!

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

JUN 10, 2007 10:12 AM

The United States has had the gay bomb since 1794.

We called it "The Navy".



wink

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUN 10, 2007 10:15 AM

ZING!

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUN 10, 2007 10:16 AM

chainlink said:
The United States has had the gay bomb since 1794.

We called it "The Navy".



wink



oh ha ha. blackeyed

TaoAndCoffee

TaoAndCoffee

Stoney Creek, ON
June 2007

JUN 10, 2007 10:18 AM

Despite being the column with perhaps the best comments ever, it's something I'd have expected to see via an e-mail forward, then subsequently in Snopes.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JUN 10, 2007 10:21 AM

SixBoxes said:
Despite being the column with perhaps the best comments ever, it's something I'd have expected to see via an e-mail forward, then subsequently in Snopes.


This was actually reported indepently in Harper's a few months back. It's presumably real.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next