Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

125 | 126 | 127

 ... 495

Next

legionnaire

legionnaire

Belgium
November 2003

JAN 09, 2007 11:09 AM

Now that the Union of Islamic Courts is out of the way, with a Western-friendly transitional government retaking control of Somalia, the US is apparently free to pursue and attack al-Qaeda there.

In its first official comment on the air strikes, the Pentagon said a raid was carried out on Sunday but declined to say if it had hit its target.

The US has long said al-Qaeda suspects linked to the 1998 US embassy bombings in East Africa took refuge in Somalia.

At least 19 people were killed in US air raids, local Somali elders say.

Fresh air raids have been carried out near the town of Afmadow, 250km further north of Sunday's raid, but it is not clear if these were carried out by the US, or by Ethiopian forces which back the transitional Somali government.

The air strikes are taking place days after the Union of Islamic Courts, which had taken control of much of central and southern Somalia during the past six months, was routed by soldiers from Ethiopia and Somalia's government.

Latest reports from the capital, Mogadishu, say unknown assailants have fired rocket propelled grenades at a building housing Ethiopian troops and Somali government forces. Two explosions were heard, followed by a brief but heavy exchange of automatic gunfire.


The connection between al-Qaeda and Somalian Islamist groups has long been suspected, and the US has been chomping at the bit to get a chance to go in there and try to find the people thought to be responsible for the US embassy bombings in 1998 in Kenya and Tanzania. But with the country in the midst of a civil war it made any military operations difficult to pursue without becoming directly involved in the conflict. With what appears to be a complete rout of the ICU by the Somali transitional government forces, the road was paved for the US to get back in and have another look.

This is the first overt military action by the US in Somalia since 1994, the year after 18 US troops were killed in Mogadishu.

Somalia's interim President, Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed, said the US had the right to bomb those who had attacked its embassies.


Apparently the new government is OK with it as well. With any luck it will be a quick operation with no collateral damage, and catching the planners of the embassy bombings could lead to more useful intelligence information about al-Qaeda, which has been supposedly difficult to obtain so far.

StopSnitchin

StopSnitchin

Hudson, NH
February 2004

JAN 09, 2007 04:47 PM

In the words of Borat...

Pekuhh! Pekuhhhhhh! shocked

TheRealTexaSGuy

TheRealTexaSGuy

Tacoma, WA
December 2003

JAN 09, 2007 04:58 PM

Jesus Fing Christ!

No!, we yell at Ethiopia (spl?), Don't go in there and help those Somalis! It's a bad idea! You're going to destabilize the whole region!

Then, soon as they do, and do it in 4 days mind you, we say, "Oh, OK, they did it and they like us, so let's start bombing shit there because it's fine now, they won't mind at all. They have a government, of sorts, in place that is friendly to us."

So, instead of going there, a region where a war on terror is justified, we go to Iraq so my friends can die for fucking OIL and some stupid sense of revenge! Mind you, that while we were at the negotiation tables with Saddam the first time, he was committing war crimes that we were FULLY aware of, and could have stopped, but we were in such a hurry to get out of the country while we were still "victorious" that we turned a blind eye and lets thousands more die because of their religion and beliefs.

Yet, here's a country where human rights violations have existed on a scale that is almost unbelieveable, but we looked the other way because we got our asses handed to us here once before (due to, gasp! surprise!, a lack of commitment).

hadees

hadees

Austin, TX
December 2003

JAN 09, 2007 05:09 PM

TexaSGuy said:
Jesus Fing Christ!

No!, we yell at Ethiopia (spl?), Don't go in there and help those Somalis! It's a bad idea! You're going to destabilize the whole region!



Where did you hear that? I had heard we didn't say anything either way.

Frankly I am glad we are finally seeing us go after al-Qaeda.

crzyboy

crzyboy

Pitman, NJ
May 2006

JAN 09, 2007 05:24 PM

hadees said:

TexaSGuy said:
Jesus Fing Christ!

No!, we yell at Ethiopia (spl?), Don't go in there and help those Somalis! It's a bad idea! You're going to destabilize the whole region!



Where did you hear that? I had heard we didn't say anything either way.

Frankly I am glad we are finally seeing us go after al-Qaeda.



Right, cuz the justification for going into Afghanistan was that they were cutting their heroin way, WAAY too weak?

Everything the current admin has done militarily has been tied to Al-Qaeda, or 911, or WMD's, or....ummm.....help me out here....oil? Allowing Lone Star to be sold in Riyad? Fuck, now I'm confused and can't recall...

screw it, Pelosi's got it covered.


More martini's bar-person!!!

VaugelyChilly

VaugelyChilly

Ireland
October 2006

JAN 09, 2007 05:29 PM

To be honest this is a damn good development, at least the ICU have been scattered and by African forces.
Such a rout was never expected but it just shows how much they thought they were in control without physical presence and the support of the people. If you don't have their hearts you better have a big gun!
And it's been long documented that plenty of guilty extremists were hold up there, here's hoping they've got their comeuppance and no innocents have suffered.
Actually here's hoping this is another step towards Africa solving it's own problems. For their sake.

Dark_Templar

Dark_Templar

Auburn, CA
June 2004

JAN 09, 2007 06:37 PM

To cut down on the number of bombing sorties........

I think we should just start making bigger bombs whatever confused

spinhouse247

spinhouse247

Punta Gorda, FL
December 2003

JAN 09, 2007 10:09 PM

Dark_Templar said:
To cut down on the number of bombing sorties........

I think we should just start making bigger bombs whatever confused



+1 for bombing shit

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JAN 09, 2007 10:12 PM

spinhouse247 said:

Dark_Templar said:
To cut down on the number of bombing sorties........

I think we should just start making bigger bombs whatever confused



+1 for bombing shit



Whooooooosh.

Andvari

Andvari

Calgary, AB
April 2005

JAN 09, 2007 10:37 PM

Way to destabalize an already unstable situation and make the locals of a region turn towards your enemies. Nothing like the USA for long term planning.

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

JAN 10, 2007 01:42 AM

Did I miss the declaration of war and Congress' approval of said declaration?!

quagmirething

quagmirething

I'm lost
June 2005

JAN 10, 2007 02:01 AM

legionnaire said:
Apparently the new government is OK with it as well.


And nothing says "you've a great future ahead of you" like a government which aproves of foreign powers bombing its own citizens.

With any luck it will be a quick operation with no collateral damage,


I'm hearing that luck wasn't with us, or more importantly with a number of Somali civilians. As to how many of the non-civilians were members of al Qaeda, we shall have to rely on the abilities and discretion of the same people who knew just where Saddam had WMDs before the Iraq war.

and catching the planners of the embassy bombings could lead to more useful intelligence information about al-Qaeda, which has been supposedly difficult to obtain so far.


Air strikes tend not to result in arrests, so avoiding those pesky trials too. How much information can there be to find? There were two bombs nearly a decade ago. Not really a relentless campaign of terror sweeping the continent.

quagmirething

quagmirething

I'm lost
June 2005

JAN 10, 2007 04:57 AM

Small update. I hear there have been about 40 prisoners taken by US forces, in addition to several more air assaults. Chances are they'll be enjoying the delights of a long flight, with bags on their heads, to a rights free zone. We shall see.

Quirky

Quirky

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

JAN 10, 2007 05:16 AM

wildswan said:
Did I miss the declaration of war and Congress' approval of said declaration?!



Yes. No true state of Somalia exists. It's totally cool to bomb an anarchichal no-man's land.

scorp17yh

scorp17yh

Brookings, OR
November 2004

JAN 10, 2007 07:24 AM

"Indiscriminate killing of civillians is surely the best way to win the hearts and minds of the people"
Insert Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rice or ony of the other insane neo-cons running this country.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

JAN 10, 2007 09:39 AM

scorp17yh said:
"Indiscriminate killing of civillians is surely the best way to win the hearts and minds of the people"
Insert Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rice or ony of the other insane neo-cons running this country.



Were not there to win their hearts and minds tho so who cares?

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JAN 10, 2007 03:54 PM

Colinism said:

scorp17yh said:
"Indiscriminate killing of civillians is surely the best way to win the hearts and minds of the people"
Insert Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rice or ony of the other insane neo-cons running this country.



Were not there to win their hearts and minds tho so who cares?



It still hasn't occurred to you that their brothers, sisters, cousins, other relatives, friends, neighbours, co-nationals and co-religionists might care?

And that those people - who outnumber the dead by a long, long way, since you need this explaining - might be a little pissed off?

Let me turn it around a little. How would you feel if some strange bunch of Islamist weirdo nutjobs decided to ram a couple of guided missiles into the middle of New York?

Getting it yet?

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

JAN 10, 2007 04:40 PM

Well I would be pissed off, however the Somalis are probably still plenty pissed at us for the last time we were there so I don't think they will get so much more pissed that they build a fleet of rafts and row across the Atlantic ocean to kill us all with machete in our sleep. So since the risk is minimal and there is really nothing they can do to us, so again I say........ Who cares, I think they will be a littl more pissed about the countries in africa fighting and using somalia as a proxy battlefield our meddling is minimal compared to that.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JAN 10, 2007 04:45 PM

Colinism said:
Well I would be pissed off, however the Somalis are probably still plenty pissed at us for the last time we were there so I don't think they will get so much more pissed that they build a fleet of rafts and row across the Atlantic ocean to kill us all with machete in our sleep. So since the risk is minimal and there is really nothing they can do to us, so again I say........ Who cares, I think they will be a littl more pissed about the countries in africa fighting and using somalia as a proxy battlefield our meddling is minimal compared to that.



Damn. You actually do hate America. surreal

Hunkpapa

Hunkpapa

United Kingdom
June 2004

JAN 10, 2007 04:56 PM

Colinism said:
Well I would be pissed off, however the Somalis are probably still plenty pissed at us for the last time we were there so I don't think they will get so much more pissed that they build a fleet of rafts and row across the Atlantic ocean to kill us all with machete in our sleep. So since the risk is minimal and there is really nothing they can do to us, so again I say........ Who cares, I think they will be a littl more pissed about the countries in africa fighting and using somalia as a proxy battlefield our meddling is minimal compared to that.



Yeah, they hate the US already so what does more bombing and shooting matter? Who cares? Ah, what the hell, kill everybody!

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

JAN 10, 2007 04:58 PM

See thats the spirit. smile

Terminal_

Terminal_

USA
September 2006

JAN 10, 2007 05:00 PM

scorp17yh said:
"Indiscriminate killing of civillians is surely the best way to win the hearts and minds of the people"
Insert Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rice or ony of the other insane neo-cons running this country.



Because only conservatives are hawks.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

JAN 10, 2007 05:43 PM

SockPuppet said:

Colinism said:
Well I would be pissed off, however the Somalis are probably still plenty pissed at us for the last time we were there so I don't think they will get so much more pissed that they build a fleet of rafts and row across the Atlantic ocean to kill us all with machete in our sleep. So since the risk is minimal and there is really nothing they can do to us, so again I say........ Who cares, I think they will be a littl more pissed about the countries in africa fighting and using somalia as a proxy battlefield our meddling is minimal compared to that.



Damn. You actually do hate America. surreal



Ok in all seriousness tho, considering the conditions already existing in Somalia even if there is some short term anger over american caused civilian deaths they have way too many problems and their civil war is not going to end any time soon. Those deaths tho tragic, are not going to influence things there.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JAN 11, 2007 02:32 PM

Colinism said:

SockPuppet said:

Colinism said:
Well I would be pissed off, however the Somalis are probably still plenty pissed at us for the last time we were there so I don't think they will get so much more pissed that they build a fleet of rafts and row across the Atlantic ocean to kill us all with machete in our sleep. So since the risk is minimal and there is really nothing they can do to us, so again I say........ Who cares, I think they will be a littl more pissed about the countries in africa fighting and using somalia as a proxy battlefield our meddling is minimal compared to that.



Damn. You actually do hate America. surreal



Ok in all seriousness tho, considering the conditions already existing in Somalia even if there is some short term anger over american caused civilian deaths they have way too many problems and their civil war is not going to end any time soon. Those deaths tho tragic, are not going to influence things there.



You might remember that

(a) the US has intervened in Somalia before - an intervention which led to the deaths of many Somali elders for no good reason. That sort of thing tends to stay in the minds of people. I'll give you an example that's a little closer to home, at least for me: British troops fired on a demonstration in 1972 and killed fourteen unarmed people, and that event acted to catalyse twenty years of Troubles.

(b) it's not a small world any more. There are many Somalis living outside Somalia, mostly because of the dismal state of affairs there. One thing to learn from September 2001: a small number of people can have a big effect.