Current Events

TOPICS:

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69

 ... 487

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 13, 2006 02:27 PM

Tomorrow Valerie Plame Wilson, Ambassador Joseph Wilson and their lawyer will hold a news conference where they will announce the filing of a civil lawsuit against I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice-President Richard Cheney and Karl Rove.

Now Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and Scooter Libby will be forced to sit through a deposition just as Bill Clinton did when he was president. Many other White House employees, like President George W. Bush, may also have to endure hours of questioning at the hands of lawyers. Just think of all the questions they will be asked.

Just as with those who were employed by the White House during the Clinton years, the financial burden will be heavy. Clinton’s bill alone was over six million dollars. Maggie Williams, who served as the first lady's chief of staff, ran up fees in excess of six figures. Other aides were forced to pay attorneys over one hundred thousand dollars. The Secret Service members who were called in to testify racked up bills of thirty thousand dollars.

Secretaries, drivers, assistants, every single person working on Air Force One the day the Wilson memo was passed around, every person who worked for the president, Karl Rove, or the vice president will be brought in for depositions. All will have an attorney by their side and that lawyer will cost them money. It’s a bad day to be an intern in the Vice President’s office.

ThisIsWhoWeAre

ThisIsWhoWeAre

Oakland, CA
July 2004

JUL 13, 2006 04:15 PM

I'm no lawyer, but just because they file a suit doesn't mean that it will be taken up by the court does it? Folks are suing the govt for the release of information all the time, and they just get ignored. Or do civil suits work differently? Some lawyer please come explain this to me! frown

Loiosh

loiosh

Charleston, WV
November 2004

JUL 13, 2006 04:34 PM

Wow.... it is almost sad to watch the completely insignificant get to 14 minutes and 59 seconds... almost... what are they trying to get on the cover of VF again?

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUL 13, 2006 04:56 PM

Loiosh said:
Wow.... it is almost sad to watch the completely insignificant get to 14 minutes and 59 seconds... almost... what are they trying to get on the cover of VF again?



Well, there it is.

A private citizen - previously employed in national defence - sues the government for trashing her career, and a "conservative" describes her as "completely insignificant".

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUL 13, 2006 05:02 PM

orpiment said:

Loiosh said:
Wow.... it is almost sad to watch the completely insignificant get to 14 minutes and 59 seconds... almost... what are they trying to get on the cover of VF again?



Well, there it is.

A private citizen - previously employed in national defence - sues the government for trashing her career, and a "conservative" describes her as "completely insignificant".


well, maybe if shed registered republican she would have more significance. GOSH.

bairdduvessa

bairdduvessa

Centerville, MA
April 2005

JUL 13, 2006 05:02 PM

what is the suit about

Moneyshot29

Moneyshot29

Toledo, OH
May 2004

JUL 13, 2006 05:06 PM

bairdduvessa said:
what is the suit about



If i had to guess.. i'd say its about them leaking her identity to the press while she was a CIA agent smile

GramNegative

GramNegative

I'm lost
October 2004

JUL 13, 2006 05:10 PM

Don't they know that Cheney shoots lawyers? In teh face!?

Loiosh

loiosh

Charleston, WV
November 2004

JUL 13, 2006 05:17 PM

No, her subsequent actions and media whoring that make her insignificant...

EvanX

EvanX

Grand Rapids, MI
June 2003

JUL 13, 2006 05:28 PM

Loiosh said:
Wow.... it is almost sad to watch the completely insignificant get to 14 minutes and 59 seconds... almost... what are they trying to get on the cover of VF again?



Are you talking about Cheney and Rove?

mamet

mamet

Charleston, SC
March 2005

JUL 13, 2006 05:31 PM

Loiosh said:
No, her subsequent actions and media whoring that make her insignificant...



For SERIOUS!

I mean, how dare she be upset about that? It's not like they did anything wrong. Get over yourself, lady!

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 13, 2006 05:42 PM

ThisIsWhoWeAre said:
I'm no lawyer, but just because they file a suit doesn't mean that it will be taken up by the court does it? Folks are suing the govt for the release of information all the time, and they just get ignored. Or do civil suits work differently? Some lawyer please come explain this to me! frown



Civil suits work very differently. From E&P

Valerie Plame Wilson, her husband Ambassador Joseph Wilson and their counsel, Christopher Wolf of Proskauer Rose LLP, will hold a news conference at 10 a.m. EDT on Friday at the National Press Club in Washington, DC 20045 to explain the filing of a civil lawsuit today against I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice-President Dick Cheney and Karl Rove, according to a statement by the lawyers.

The complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, obrtained by E&P, charges (as its heading puts it) "First and Fifth Amendment Violations, Civil Rights Conspiracy, Failure to Prevent Civil Rights Violations, Public Disclosure of Private Facts, and Civil Conspiracy."

The suit accuses the defendants of violating the Wilsons' constitutional and other legal rights as a result of "a conspiracy among current and former high-level officials in the White House" to "discredit, punish and seek revenge against" Joseph Wilson for publicly disputing statements made by President Bush in his 2003 State of the Union address justifying the war in Iraq.

As a result of Cheney, Libby and Rove's conduct, the suit claims that the Wilsons have suffered violations of their rights guaranteed under the United States Constitution and by laws of the District of Columbia.

The complaint specifies that each of the Wilsons has been deprived of their First and Fifth Amendment rights; each has suffered a gross invasion of their privacy; each has been impaired in pursuing professional opportunities; and that they fear for their safety and the safety of their children as a result of the wrongful public disclosures.

In addition, the complaint alleges that Valerie Wilson was impaired in her ability to carry out her duties at the CIA, and to pursue her career at the agency in further service to her country, as she had planned. While no specific dollar amount is requested, the suit seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorneys' fees and costs.

Ecto_Cooler

Ecto_Cooler

Bronx, NY
April 2004

JUL 13, 2006 05:44 PM

orpiment said:

Loiosh said:
Wow.... it is almost sad to watch the completely insignificant get to 14 minutes and 59 seconds... almost... what are they trying to get on the cover of VF again?



Well, there it is.

A private citizen - previously employed in national defence - sues the government for trashing her career, and a "conservative" describes her as "completely insignificant".



She had no significant career. She was not a secret agent. There weren't any laws broken. There were no secrets exposed or people put at risk.

And 99 percent of the public doesn't give a shit about this case.

For fuck's sake, let it die. "Fitzmas" is not coming, and if you're looking to get back at Dubya Bush, Rove and co., there are million better ways to go about it than riding on the backs of two attention whores who posed for a Vanity Fair spread.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 13, 2006 05:50 PM

Totally insignificant. Unless you know how to use the internets

MSNBC confirms: Outed CIA agent was working on Iran.


According to current and former intelligence officials, Plame Wilson, who worked on the clandestine side of the CIA in the Directorate of Operations as a non-official cover (NOC) officer, was part of an operation tracking distribution and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction technology to and from Iran.

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

JUL 13, 2006 05:50 PM

Ecto_Cooler said:
For fuck's sake, let it die. "Fitzmas" is not coming, and if you're looking to get back at Dubya Bush, Rove and co., there are million better ways to go about it than riding on the backs of two attention whores who posed for a Vanity Fair spread.



Please explain the million better ways?
I'm having difficulty with that statement.

formerviking

formerviking

Denver, PA
May 2006

JUL 13, 2006 05:51 PM

I hope this finally drags out into the open for everyone to see ( including those who would rather believe it didn't matter ) just how this bunch of fuckwads operate . The simple fact is by releasing her identity , they not only endangered Wilson's life , but everyone who may have been working undercover around her . If you can't see that , then I hope you enjoy the rest of your life with those rose colored glasses .

Damn , too slow on the draw with that post I see ...

SirPsychoSexy

SirPsychoSexy

Ridgewood, NJ
January 2004

JUL 13, 2006 05:57 PM

Ecto_Cooler said:

orpiment said:

Loiosh said:
Wow.... it is almost sad to watch the completely insignificant get to 14 minutes and 59 seconds... almost... what are they trying to get on the cover of VF again?



Well, there it is.

A private citizen - previously employed in national defence - sues the government for trashing her career, and a "conservative" describes her as "completely insignificant".



She had no significant career.


Wrong.

She was not a secret agent.


Wrong.

There weren't any laws broken.


Wrong.

There were no secrets exposed or people put at risk.


Wrong.

And 99 percent of the public doesn't give a shit about
this ...


Annnnd... Wrong.

OctEgon

OctEgon

Tustin, CA
July 2005

JUL 13, 2006 05:59 PM

I'll go on record and say that these fuckwads deserve whatever Wilson/Plame can throw at them. (Brave of me, I know)

thefreak

thefreak

NEWSWIRE

Gardner, MA

JUL 13, 2006 08:12 PM

Loiosh said:
No, her subsequent actions and media whoring that make her insignificant...



...says a professed fan of Ann Coulter.

Pot, meet kettle.

-TM

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUL 13, 2006 08:39 PM

SirPsychoSexy said:

Ecto_Cooler said:

orpiment said:

Loiosh said:
Wow.... it is almost sad to watch the completely insignificant get to 14 minutes and 59 seconds... almost... what are they trying to get on the cover of VF again?



Well, there it is.

A private citizen - previously employed in national defence - sues the government for trashing her career, and a "conservative" describes her as "completely insignificant".



She had no significant career.


Wrong.

She was not a secret agent.


Wrong.

There weren't any laws broken.


Wrong.

There were no secrets exposed or people put at risk.


Wrong.

And 99 percent of the public doesn't give a shit about
this ...


Annnnd... Wrong.



but maybe if we repeat it one more time, the lie will be the truth!

bones_708

bones_708

Houston, TX
December 2004

JUL 13, 2006 09:41 PM

bones_708

bones_708

Houston, TX
December 2004

JUL 13, 2006 09:52 PM

I think they are just doing this to try and get press. Val has her book and good know they love the attention. Probably only about a 1 in 5 chance it ever gets to a court.

I also wonder if it does go to court it may very well backfire on them when discovery is available to the defendants?

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUL 13, 2006 09:57 PM

bones_708 said:
I think they are just doing this to try and get press. Val has her book and good know they love the attention. Probably only about a 1 in 5 chance it ever gets to a court.



just think of it as an employee sueing for unemployment wages after wrongful termination. i mean its not like she can ever be a secret operative again. they screwed her career, let em pay some damages.

bones_708

bones_708

Houston, TX
December 2004

JUL 13, 2006 09:59 PM

attn_ho said:

bones_708 said:
I think they are just doing this to try and get press. Val has her book and good know they love the attention. Probably only about a 1 in 5 chance it ever gets to a court.



just think of it as an employee sueing for unemployment wages after wrongful termination. i mean its not like she can ever be a secret operative again. they screwed her career, let em pay some damages.



Yes but when they both get million dollar book deals somehow I don't think they were "damaged" in any real degree.

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

JUL 13, 2006 10:07 PM

bones_708 said:

Yes but when they both get million dollar book deals somehow I don't think they were "damaged" in any real degree.


syhucks, bones, i guess thats for the courts to decide.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next