It's funny, but since I started writing about an adolescent boy and an older woman getting the hots for one another, I been noticing an unusual amount of news stories on the subject of such relationships.
First a teacher who had sex with a 15 year old is found Not Guilty of statuary rape.
Now here's a man here who is, like, a hero to me. Imagine being a Chief Constable, and having the courage to say that someone who engages in sexual activity with a teenager below 16 should not neccessarily be classed as a peodophile! But the guy's simply making the wildly obvious point that to say that there is one age at which children, suddenly and overnight, just 'become' sexual beings is absurd, and that if a person had undergone, or is undergoing puberty, it is reasonable to say that they have a sexual identity.
First a teacher who had sex with a 15 year old is found Not Guilty of statuary rape.
Now here's a man here who is, like, a hero to me. Imagine being a Chief Constable, and having the courage to say that someone who engages in sexual activity with a teenager below 16 should not neccessarily be classed as a peodophile! But the guy's simply making the wildly obvious point that to say that there is one age at which children, suddenly and overnight, just 'become' sexual beings is absurd, and that if a person had undergone, or is undergoing puberty, it is reasonable to say that they have a sexual identity.
I think the closer they get to 16, the more it becomes a grey area and I think everyone in the field of dealing with sexual health and sexual activity acknowledges that.
VIEW 5 of 5 COMMENTS
Smart, sexy, redheaded (
doh! there is something wrong with you... other side of the world!!