This economic crisis is getting bad... we only get one SG set a day now? Deja v, really. I remember a time when they had three sets a day. It didn't last long. I marked the loss of a third set up to updating issues, be it code or programmer error. But now we must consider... is it lack of new sets?!
The front page would suggest not. Then why the fuck can't the SG-Powers-That-Be can't follow through with giving us two sets a day? Have they not noticed they're screwing us? Once I remember seeing a tag on the front page saying how there were two sets a day; that tag is no longer there. So even though there's a huge influx of new girls and new sets from established SGs we are losing a set a day? I ask again, have they not noticed sets aren't going live every 12 hours like they once declared or are they cutting back for no apparent reason. I guess it's time to consider ending the subscription again.
Since I'm bitching about the site, let me pose another quandry of things around here: why is it on the front page the link to the set says 115 photos and there turns out to be 45? I'm not complaining about less photos, I'm just wondering why the site can't do simple addition and post the correct number in the set. Again, poor programming or lack of care?
Get it straight SG.
The front page would suggest not. Then why the fuck can't the SG-Powers-That-Be can't follow through with giving us two sets a day? Have they not noticed they're screwing us? Once I remember seeing a tag on the front page saying how there were two sets a day; that tag is no longer there. So even though there's a huge influx of new girls and new sets from established SGs we are losing a set a day? I ask again, have they not noticed sets aren't going live every 12 hours like they once declared or are they cutting back for no apparent reason. I guess it's time to consider ending the subscription again.
Since I'm bitching about the site, let me pose another quandry of things around here: why is it on the front page the link to the set says 115 photos and there turns out to be 45? I'm not complaining about less photos, I'm just wondering why the site can't do simple addition and post the correct number in the set. Again, poor programming or lack of care?
Get it straight SG.
So what'd you think of the Bond flick?
Manko is definitely an amazing beauty, and she seems crazy as fuck too ( I mean in this a good way of course). Another one of my favs from a little while ago was a bit too out there apparently. I know she had "fantasies" about being raped and I think that somehow made it into one of her sets finally. And you probably remember she was booted. Did you ever see that Nana set? I think I actually saw it and like didn't really pay close attention to it while I was doing stuff around here, and then there was the removal and whole brew-ha-ha. She had an eye fetish too, something about losing an eyeball. Actually I think the set may have involved her in an operating room (not unfamiliar on this site) and at the end she had an eye-patch on. Frankly I don't see what the fuck is wrong with that. I mean people have weird shit they're into. If it was a set with her getting raped (presumably by a woman since girl on girl is the only multi set allowed), that I could understand. That was a bummer, Nana was one of the few sgs that commented on my page regularly.
Anyhow, best wishes for the holidays as well.