love, the idiosyncratic i
love, can the term be used too often? what does it connote? what does it denote? love just is. if you are my mate, what attachments are associated with this love? how does it differentiate or compete, if need be? when we speak of god's love what do we mean? if we were made in his image, can we then not love as he?
yes! so my love for you, who ever you are should not cause jealousy no more than god's love for another. or is the concept of an all pervading love, even of mine enemy though she hate me, i hate her not. Surely i hate her ways yet love her still. though she malign and slander does that make her unworthy of my unconditional love? does that love connote by its very existence the condition of reciprocation, reciprocity? nay. for it is unconditional.
webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary
1agape: 1love feast: 2 love 4a
1love: 4 a: unselfish loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another (1) the fatherly concern of god for man (2) the brotherly concern for others
so should the "other" be another woman, are you accusing paternal or fraternal incest? am i no less than my father?
in and out of context is my love, for it is so rare, so pure a gift that it is often trounced, shunned questioned as unrealistic or a betoken of lust, infidelity, suspect.
for my brother does it portend "brotherly concern" or does this too denote a tryst? then why so my sister? or can there be no filial love between the male and female, except along bloodlines?
my love, it's connotations it's denotations will not be perverted by petty self centered insecurities or doubts about my masculinity or my idiosyncratic i!
to quote my favorite woman poet laureate june jordan
" i am not wrong: wrong is not my name
my name is my own my own my own"
know me by it: love
love, can the term be used too often? what does it connote? what does it denote? love just is. if you are my mate, what attachments are associated with this love? how does it differentiate or compete, if need be? when we speak of god's love what do we mean? if we were made in his image, can we then not love as he?
yes! so my love for you, who ever you are should not cause jealousy no more than god's love for another. or is the concept of an all pervading love, even of mine enemy though she hate me, i hate her not. Surely i hate her ways yet love her still. though she malign and slander does that make her unworthy of my unconditional love? does that love connote by its very existence the condition of reciprocation, reciprocity? nay. for it is unconditional.
webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary
1agape: 1love feast: 2 love 4a
1love: 4 a: unselfish loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another (1) the fatherly concern of god for man (2) the brotherly concern for others
so should the "other" be another woman, are you accusing paternal or fraternal incest? am i no less than my father?
in and out of context is my love, for it is so rare, so pure a gift that it is often trounced, shunned questioned as unrealistic or a betoken of lust, infidelity, suspect.
for my brother does it portend "brotherly concern" or does this too denote a tryst? then why so my sister? or can there be no filial love between the male and female, except along bloodlines?
my love, it's connotations it's denotations will not be perverted by petty self centered insecurities or doubts about my masculinity or my idiosyncratic i!
to quote my favorite woman poet laureate june jordan
" i am not wrong: wrong is not my name
my name is my own my own my own"
know me by it: love