im totally going to sleep after i master this whole coagulation cascade. seriously, after this, im getting some fucking sleep.
More Blogs
-
1
Sunday Feb 27, 2005
anyone know how i can compress jpg's down to <100 kb? -
1
Friday Feb 25, 2005
i am not in a good mood today, and i dont know why. well, i kind of k… -
4
Friday Feb 18, 2005
off to nyc with n, which should be interesting. the fung wah bus awai… -
1
Tuesday Feb 15, 2005
fuck you, comcast, and your inept and unfriendly service/tech people. -
2
Monday Feb 07, 2005
rip ernst mayr. i wonder if he say this one coming... those of … -
1
Saturday Feb 05, 2005
at some point im really going to have something to say, and the time … -
1
Thursday Feb 03, 2005
god damn i make good fajitas. -
2
Thursday Jan 27, 2005
rip philip johnson. -
1
Tuesday Jan 25, 2005
mice have really fucking small spinal cords. really really fucking sm… -
2
Sunday Jan 23, 2005
no school tomorrow!
So are you saying that, for instance, if I were able to correlate Eliot's environment with the imagery of his poems, it would not work? (An obvious example of environment affecting would could be Blake and 'London'.)
I think that it is very difficult to disassorciate seminal experiences from one's life from one's creations. It would be difficult to aruge that the affects of drugs, positive or not, does not affect the user.
I have read essays which attempt to correlate themes in Virigina Woolf's work with experiences she had 20 years prior to the work's creation. Is that an illegitimate claim?
A very obvious example would be Coleridge's 'Kubla Khan', his attempt to capture the experience of the opium dream. Can we say that this poem is uninfluenced by the affects of drugs on the poem's creator? (A very cursory google search turns up this link as the first result).
anyways, yeah, i feel you on the sleep deprivation deal pal. oh boy do i ever.