im totally going to sleep after i master this whole coagulation cascade. seriously, after this, im getting some fucking sleep.
More Blogs
-
1
Wednesday Jun 22, 2005
im started to really enjoy reading cookbooks on the shitter. its a go… -
3
Monday May 23, 2005
today was a good day. i woke up late, got laid, got a burrito, and th… -
1
Friday May 20, 2005
im done and drunk on champagne! -
1
Friday May 13, 2005
have my physical diagnosis final with a standardized patient in about… -
0
Saturday May 07, 2005
gave tours to alumni today. old people (and old docs) fucking rock. i… -
1
Monday May 02, 2005
the art in bloom exhibit at the mfa was rad. basically, various flowe… -
1
Wednesday Apr 27, 2005
damn, erin is fucking hot. we get to play with the brains more to… -
1
Sunday Apr 24, 2005
the weather is pretty sweet here today. its fairly warm, and just off… -
2
Monday Apr 18, 2005
i am back. thank fucking god. emotional drama is amazing. -
0
Thursday Apr 14, 2005
off to md for a wedding. back monday with much physiology studied (or…
So are you saying that, for instance, if I were able to correlate Eliot's environment with the imagery of his poems, it would not work? (An obvious example of environment affecting would could be Blake and 'London'.)
I think that it is very difficult to disassorciate seminal experiences from one's life from one's creations. It would be difficult to aruge that the affects of drugs, positive or not, does not affect the user.
I have read essays which attempt to correlate themes in Virigina Woolf's work with experiences she had 20 years prior to the work's creation. Is that an illegitimate claim?
A very obvious example would be Coleridge's 'Kubla Khan', his attempt to capture the experience of the opium dream. Can we say that this poem is uninfluenced by the affects of drugs on the poem's creator? (A very cursory google search turns up this link as the first result).
anyways, yeah, i feel you on the sleep deprivation deal pal. oh boy do i ever.