ranstarr

this account runs out today.
ill be using a different account from today on.
yeah its a bit strange but its hard to explain why.
if you want to add me there go ahead, if not its coo. reamazing

my head hurts.
last night sucked.
have a good day.

VIEW 3 of 3 COMMENTS

linoleum:

Apr 8, 2006

livingdeadkirst:

hey which one are you going to be using...this one or the other one...?

Apr 8, 2006

i am sorry for the pain i have caused others.
i shouldnt of said anything. it was wrong of me.

be good people. ranstarr has left the building.

click here

VIEW 6 of 6 COMMENTS

slithers:

oh god not the badgers pleasssssse i watched it ages ago so much that i cant bare to watch it any more haha.

Apr 6, 2006

livingdeadkirst:

badger badger badger badger badger...YAY!!!

oooohhhh a snake.... LMAO

Apr 7, 2006

blah

VIEW 7 of 7 COMMENTS

linoleum:

BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!

Apr 5, 2006

linoleum:

Apr 5, 2006

blah

VIEW 3 of 3 COMMENTS

linoleum:

you are liking interiors this week noodle - you should come to uni with me

xx

love you

Apr 4, 2006

damnation_game:

good lord i take it back i aint going to shoot me... ill shoot him

Apr 4, 2006

blah

relentless_hate:

coincidentally, i just (re)read a interesting book by one of my favourite authors entitled The Dragons of Eden: Speculations on the Evolution of Human Intelligence...it covers quite a lot of the functions in the brain, mainly relating to the neocortex and the limbic system tho, but it had some interesting things to say about patients that had suffered lesions (severe in some cases, war casualties etc.) on the frontal lobe and how it affected their lives. ie..not much at all... "have almost no obvious effects on behaviour at all" (obviously complete frontal lobe removal results in vegetables). It also has a very interesting chapter relating to the capacity of apes, when taught american sign language, to engage in abstract thought (now that we could understand their thoughts with signing.). which *was* thought to separate man from beast, obviously it goes into a lot more detail..it was written in the late seventies i think...but i read something recently that remarked how accurate a lot of the concepts were....umm..anyways..its a good read...lol..umm..if your into that sort of thing....oooobviously only for dorks..which i am not...ok then..sorry for the long comment.