Why did the chicken cross the road?
Thomas Edison: She thought it would be an illuminating experience.
William J. Broad: The crux is that the vast majority of the poultry in the
universe seems to be missing.
Richard Feynman: It didn't cross the road to the other side. It actually
came back to where it started but was momentarily moving backward in time.
.emit ni drawkcab gnivom yliratnemom saw tub detrats ti erehw to kcab emac
yllautca tI .edis rehot eht to daor eht ssorc t'ndid tI :namnyeF drahciR
Bucky Fuller: Because we have not yet designed and implemented true,
constantly forwardly/backwardly evolving, energy-transforming living
machines which will enable us to perform all functions from the informedly
turbining hub of a single autonomous in-spiralling/out-radiating network of
space-connected information vector transforms. Had the chicken been
supplied with my Dymaxion Tensegrity Coop, it would have remained at home,
un-tempted by such risky spatial-temporal translations.
And my FAVORITE!
Why did the chicken cross the road?
Erwin Schroedinger: Since the wording of the question implies the absence of an observer (else the fowl's motivation might easily be deduced), it is evident that
the chicken simultaneously did _and_ did not cross the road. In the face of
this, any speculation as to the bird's purpose must be viewed as mere
sophistry -- and as such is beyond the bounds of this discussion, and until the actual act or non-act of crossing the road is observed, the act shall remain a cloud of probabilities.
I've been losing myself in some fucking great books lately.
Feeling generally content, would like to be affectionate and doting.
Care for some affection? Care to be doted upon?
This is what I want to give to you.
AND... My email wasn't working. If you tried to send me an email, I didn't get it. Please resend it, huh?
Thomas Edison: She thought it would be an illuminating experience.
William J. Broad: The crux is that the vast majority of the poultry in the
universe seems to be missing.
Richard Feynman: It didn't cross the road to the other side. It actually
came back to where it started but was momentarily moving backward in time.
.emit ni drawkcab gnivom yliratnemom saw tub detrats ti erehw to kcab emac
yllautca tI .edis rehot eht to daor eht ssorc t'ndid tI :namnyeF drahciR
Bucky Fuller: Because we have not yet designed and implemented true,
constantly forwardly/backwardly evolving, energy-transforming living
machines which will enable us to perform all functions from the informedly
turbining hub of a single autonomous in-spiralling/out-radiating network of
space-connected information vector transforms. Had the chicken been
supplied with my Dymaxion Tensegrity Coop, it would have remained at home,
un-tempted by such risky spatial-temporal translations.
And my FAVORITE!
Why did the chicken cross the road?
Erwin Schroedinger: Since the wording of the question implies the absence of an observer (else the fowl's motivation might easily be deduced), it is evident that
the chicken simultaneously did _and_ did not cross the road. In the face of
this, any speculation as to the bird's purpose must be viewed as mere
sophistry -- and as such is beyond the bounds of this discussion, and until the actual act or non-act of crossing the road is observed, the act shall remain a cloud of probabilities.
I've been losing myself in some fucking great books lately.
Feeling generally content, would like to be affectionate and doting.
Care for some affection? Care to be doted upon?
This is what I want to give to you.
AND... My email wasn't working. If you tried to send me an email, I didn't get it. Please resend it, huh?
VIEW 18 of 18 COMMENTS
Cherry xox