photography lens question
I shoot with a Canon Rebel XT
I like lowlight photography...no flash...no tripod
so i was recommended the 85mm f/ 1.8
but then I noticed the 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS (Image Stabilizer)
I'm not really good with all of these technical terms for the lenses...i don't really understand the difference between the 2 apart from IS..
is the IS worth the extra money? does it work well? or should I just go with the 85mm f/ 1.8?
can anyone help?
(I did post this in the photography group as well, but no one has replied yet)
I shoot with a Canon Rebel XT
I like lowlight photography...no flash...no tripod
so i was recommended the 85mm f/ 1.8
but then I noticed the 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS (Image Stabilizer)
I'm not really good with all of these technical terms for the lenses...i don't really understand the difference between the 2 apart from IS..
is the IS worth the extra money? does it work well? or should I just go with the 85mm f/ 1.8?
can anyone help?
(I did post this in the photography group as well, but no one has replied yet)
VIEW 5 of 5 COMMENTS
IS is not really neccessary for what you want. At F4.5 (the maximum size apeture on the IS lens), you're still going to have slower shutter speeds than the 85mm at F1.8 (and so blurrier pictures). It doesn't stop the image from bluring if people are moving, just helps prevent camera shake (your hand moving slightly while the shutter is open). If they did an F1.8 lens with IS and you had the money to spend I'd say go for it, but the F4.5 IS lens really isn't suitable for what you want.
I'd recomend you find a decent canon lens with F1.4. You'll be taking better pictures in lower light conditions than both of the above, and I think it'll still be cheaper than the IS lens. I don't know what the maximum ISO setting is for a Rebel XT but I'm sure you'd be fine in most night time indoor locations at about 1600 ISO with an F1.4, particularly if you're not printing your pictures and so can take very big pictures and reduce them in size.
Hope that helps a bit