Wow. It would seem SG is regressing to the 80's. Lately I've been seeing a lot of sets reminiscent of fucking Bob Guccione from Penthouse with the soft focus. I'm sorry, but retro should be employed by models, not the photographers. The arty progressive shot that's at least partially focused is fine, but a full frame shot out of focus doesn't wash. WTF ? Maybe it was novel in the 80's, but it just looks lazy and annoying today. I have to wonder if some of these beautiful models' sets are being passed over on the Front Page because of this "flaw". Maybe, but nobody's talking. I say if photogs wanna go retro, there's a host of way cooler ploys to use, and have been used on this site. Step it up.
End of rant.
There have been some great sets by veteran models, and new models, that don't seem to get enough positive response lately. At least not enough to get purchased for the Front Page. Is SG losing that many subscribers? Do they only respond to their short list of favs ? Is the bandwidth of approved beauty becoming narrower? I wonder.
End of rant.
There have been some great sets by veteran models, and new models, that don't seem to get enough positive response lately. At least not enough to get purchased for the Front Page. Is SG losing that many subscribers? Do they only respond to their short list of favs ? Is the bandwidth of approved beauty becoming narrower? I wonder.
VIEW 18 of 18 COMMENTS
lyona:
i'm happy u liked my set thanks for your support! i hope to become an sg soon
mylene:
Your last comment put the widest smile on my face, thank you!