Why must all books on novel writing be total gloom, doom, and nay saying? I understand, really. I know all too well how much life sucks and that I will never be published. Why on earth must they club me about the head and eyes with it? I read them for advice and encouragement, not endless pages of depression; I can get that from my own mind, and I wouldn't have to pay twenty bucks for it.
More Blogs
-
3
Thursday Jun 18, 2009
Read More -
2
Thursday Jun 04, 2009
Read More -
7
Friday May 15, 2009
Why is it that I find peace and comfort in the rain? Thunderstorms a… -
2
Saturday May 02, 2009
Taken was pretty fucking awesome. Just so you know. -
4
Monday Apr 13, 2009
Why on earth do I post blogs at ass-o-clock in the morning? -
2
Friday Mar 27, 2009
My kitty cat disappeared outside for a couple hours. He finally came… -
2
Sunday Mar 22, 2009
I guess you have to be really attractive to get a sugar momma huh? -
5
Wednesday Mar 04, 2009
It's not my birthday, it's not today. -
4
Monday Jan 05, 2009
A belated Happy New Year to all! And fuck Michigan. -
6
Monday Dec 15, 2008
Shoe attack on the President = Greatest thing ever!
I know the only thing I'll most likely ever have published were high school paper articles and the town hall meeting summaries for my small town news paper. But I still write stuff. And if someday I make it more than 50 pages into something and actually figure out how to wrap up an ending maybe I'll have someone look at it if I get a chance. Otherwise I think it is good to write for the sake of writing.
So take the constructive advice from those books and let the rest go in one ear and out the other
I have a question. Do you think an ending should be already sort of established in your mind early on or it should come as you are getting toward the end? I have always wondered what is the better way to go about it. Sometimes I try to make it like a debate case and outline everything first.