Why must all books on novel writing be total gloom, doom, and nay saying? I understand, really. I know all too well how much life sucks and that I will never be published. Why on earth must they club me about the head and eyes with it? I read them for advice and encouragement, not endless pages of depression; I can get that from my own mind, and I wouldn't have to pay twenty bucks for it.
More Blogs
-
1
Saturday Nov 05, 2011
Remember, remember... -
1
Thursday Jun 30, 2011
Dear Deutsch, Please stop being a horrible, bitch of a language to… -
0
Wednesday Mar 23, 2011
There's a woman at work whos little girl has declared me her boyfrien… -
0
Wednesday Feb 16, 2011
Read More -
2
Monday Jan 10, 2011
Let's hear it for greatly defered action. I'm in to frittering. -
1
Wednesday May 19, 2010
Do you suppose one must major in his or her native tongue to be a wri… -
3
Monday May 03, 2010
Have you heard about the lonesome loser? -
2
Sunday Apr 25, 2010
It's my grandfather's birthday today. He passed away less than a yea… -
1
Thursday Apr 08, 2010
How does one go about rewriting a manuscript when one can't even stan… -
2
Tuesday Mar 30, 2010
Why must all books on novel writing be total gloom, doom, and nay say…
I know the only thing I'll most likely ever have published were high school paper articles and the town hall meeting summaries for my small town news paper. But I still write stuff. And if someday I make it more than 50 pages into something and actually figure out how to wrap up an ending maybe I'll have someone look at it if I get a chance. Otherwise I think it is good to write for the sake of writing.
So take the constructive advice from those books and let the rest go in one ear and out the other
I have a question. Do you think an ending should be already sort of established in your mind early on or it should come as you are getting toward the end? I have always wondered what is the better way to go about it. Sometimes I try to make it like a debate case and outline everything first.