Lovelace was an almost good movie. Amanda Seyfried did stellar work in an under-written role. It's one of those movies with lots of famous actors in small roles, which is distracting and takes you out of the movie. Also, if your movie is 87 minutes (before credits) and has two separate "Six years later" jumps it is probably not structured properly. Also, per the credits, Linda Lovelace's story is a work of fiction, with fictional characters with only unintentional similarities to actual events (?) Skip it.
More Blogs
-
1
Wednesday Aug 29, 2012
I went and saw Alanis Morissette tonight (last night, I guess). She'… -
0
Sunday Aug 12, 2012
My instinct toward women, in general, is flawed to the point that I n… -
1
Saturday Aug 04, 2012
If you're a history buff check out "Hatfields & McCoys" the History C… -
0
Tuesday Jul 24, 2012
Just watched on Blu Ray the movie "Margaret" starring Anna Paquin. A… -
1
Friday Jul 20, 2012
The Dark Knight Rises was good and satisfying. I am not going to lie… -
2
Saturday Jul 14, 2012
I like to think I am a exceedingly polite person. I don't brag about… -
0
Tuesday Jun 19, 2012
Just finished the first season of The Wire. Man, good show. I have … -
0
Saturday Jun 09, 2012
I have decided I need to see Kiss and Motley Crue this September at t… -
0
Friday Jun 08, 2012
Prometheus was terrific. A true science fiction movie that actually r… -
0
Wednesday May 30, 2012
Ween have (has?) broken up. One of my favorite current bands now has…